Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92003 |
Summary: | Valuing research deliverables implies the assessment of knowledge, skills, and solutions that can create benefits for a wide scope of stakeholders, including researchers, research units, universities, businesses, and the larger society. Investing in early-stage technology or technology that is novel and has an inventive step can imply a high-risk investment. High-quality information and advice are needed, and valuation methods are required, to support decision making regarding intellectual property rights protection, define a technology value proposition, devise a roadmap to bring technology into the market, and support negotiations with potential licensees. To provide information and evidence regarding the main technology valuation methods in use by Portuguese University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), qualitative and quantitative data have been collected by surveying and interviewing eight Portuguese University TTOs. From the data it was possible to conclude that pre-defined rating/ranking methods and models are the most frequently used valuation methods, followed by market valuation approaches. Previous agreements and discounted cash-flow projections are mainly used when a spin-off firm is under consideration or when there is a manifestation of interest from a potential investor. Royalty standards are used to prepare licensing negotiations, and Real Options, Monte Carlo simulation, rules of thumb, and Auctions are not being used. |
id |
RCAP_d3c574d7742c09ab4b96c643b3ca11aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/92003 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer officesTechnology transferTechnology valuation and licensingUniversity and industry relationCiências Sociais::Economia e GestãoIndústria, inovação e infraestruturasValuing research deliverables implies the assessment of knowledge, skills, and solutions that can create benefits for a wide scope of stakeholders, including researchers, research units, universities, businesses, and the larger society. Investing in early-stage technology or technology that is novel and has an inventive step can imply a high-risk investment. High-quality information and advice are needed, and valuation methods are required, to support decision making regarding intellectual property rights protection, define a technology value proposition, devise a roadmap to bring technology into the market, and support negotiations with potential licensees. To provide information and evidence regarding the main technology valuation methods in use by Portuguese University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), qualitative and quantitative data have been collected by surveying and interviewing eight Portuguese University TTOs. From the data it was possible to conclude that pre-defined rating/ranking methods and models are the most frequently used valuation methods, followed by market valuation approaches. Previous agreements and discounted cash-flow projections are mainly used when a spin-off firm is under consideration or when there is a manifestation of interest from a potential investor. Royalty standards are used to prepare licensing negotiations, and Real Options, Monte Carlo simulation, rules of thumb, and Auctions are not being used.FCT -Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia(UIDB/00319/2020)SpringerUniversidade do MinhoRocha, António Miguel SousaRomero, FernandoLima, Rui M.Amorim, M.Cruz-Cunha, M.20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zconference paperinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/92003engRocha, A., Romero, F., Lima, R. M., Amorim, M., & Cruz-Cunha, M. (2023). Technology Transfer and Valuation Methods in Use by University Technology Transfer Offices. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Nature Switzerland. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36840-0_3978-3-031-36839-41865-092910.1007/978-3-031-36840-0_3978-3-031-36840-0https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-36840-0_3info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-09-07T01:32:44Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/92003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:57:03.321708Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
title |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
spellingShingle |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices Rocha, António Miguel Sousa Technology transfer Technology valuation and licensing University and industry relation Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão Indústria, inovação e infraestruturas |
title_short |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
title_full |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
title_fullStr |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
title_sort |
Technology transfer and valuation methods in use by university technology transfer offices |
author |
Rocha, António Miguel Sousa |
author_facet |
Rocha, António Miguel Sousa Romero, Fernando Lima, Rui M. Amorim, M. Cruz-Cunha, M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Romero, Fernando Lima, Rui M. Amorim, M. Cruz-Cunha, M. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, António Miguel Sousa Romero, Fernando Lima, Rui M. Amorim, M. Cruz-Cunha, M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Technology transfer Technology valuation and licensing University and industry relation Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão Indústria, inovação e infraestruturas |
topic |
Technology transfer Technology valuation and licensing University and industry relation Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão Indústria, inovação e infraestruturas |
description |
Valuing research deliverables implies the assessment of knowledge, skills, and solutions that can create benefits for a wide scope of stakeholders, including researchers, research units, universities, businesses, and the larger society. Investing in early-stage technology or technology that is novel and has an inventive step can imply a high-risk investment. High-quality information and advice are needed, and valuation methods are required, to support decision making regarding intellectual property rights protection, define a technology value proposition, devise a roadmap to bring technology into the market, and support negotiations with potential licensees. To provide information and evidence regarding the main technology valuation methods in use by Portuguese University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), qualitative and quantitative data have been collected by surveying and interviewing eight Portuguese University TTOs. From the data it was possible to conclude that pre-defined rating/ranking methods and models are the most frequently used valuation methods, followed by market valuation approaches. Previous agreements and discounted cash-flow projections are mainly used when a spin-off firm is under consideration or when there is a manifestation of interest from a potential investor. Royalty standards are used to prepare licensing negotiations, and Real Options, Monte Carlo simulation, rules of thumb, and Auctions are not being used. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference paper |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92003 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, A., Romero, F., Lima, R. M., Amorim, M., & Cruz-Cunha, M. (2023). Technology Transfer and Valuation Methods in Use by University Technology Transfer Offices. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Nature Switzerland. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36840-0_3 978-3-031-36839-4 1865-0929 10.1007/978-3-031-36840-0_3 978-3-031-36840-0 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-36840-0_3 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597079789764608 |