Export Ready — 

Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abegão Pinto, L
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Vandewalle, E, Willekens, K, Marques-Neves, C, Stalmans, I
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2364
Summary: PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between ocular blood flow velocities and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in glaucoma patients using colour Doppler imaging (CDI) waveform analysis. METHOD: A prospective, observer-masked, case-control study was performed. OPA and blood flow variables from central retinal artery and vein (CRA, CRV), nasal and temporal short posterior ciliary arteries (NPCA, TPCA) and ophthalmic artery (OA) were obtained through dynamic contour tonometry and CDI, respectively. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to explore the correlations between OPA and retrobulbar CDI waveform and systemic cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, blood pressure amplitude, mean ocular perfusion pressure and peripheral pulse). RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients were included [healthy controls: 55; primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG): 74; normal-tension glaucoma (NTG): 63]. OPA was statistically different between groups (Healthy: 3.17 ± 1.2 mmHg; NTG: 2.58 ± 1.2 mmHg; POAG: 2.60 ± 1.1 mmHg; p < 0.01), but not between the glaucoma groups (p = 0.60). Multiple regression models to explain OPA variance were made for each cohort (healthy: p < 0.001, r = 0.605; NTG: p = 0.003, r = 0.372; POAG: p < 0.001, r = 0.412). OPA was independently associated with retrobulbar CDI parameters in the healthy subjects and POAG patients (healthy CRV resistance index: β = 3.37, CI: 0.16-6.59; healthy NPCA mean systolic/diastolic velocity ratio: β = 1.34, CI: 0.52-2.15; POAG TPCA mean systolic velocity: β = 0.14, CI 0.05-0.23). OPA in the NTG group was associated with diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate (β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.01; β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular-related models provide a better explanation to OPA variance in healthy individuals than in glaucoma patients. The variables that influence OPA seem to be different in healthy, POAG and NTG patients.
id RCAP_cf936f533d4511c74023dedf31cd18ad
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/2364
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma PatientsCHLC OFTAgedBlood Flow VelocityBlood Pressure/physiologyCase-Control StudiesCiliary Arteries/physiologyGlaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathologyIntraocular Pressure/physiologyLaser-Doppler FlowmetryLow Tension Glaucoma/physiopathologyProspective StudiesPulse Wave AnalysisRetinal Artery/physiologyRetinal Vein/physiologySingle-Blind MethodTonometry, OcularGlaucoma, Primary Open AnglePURPOSE: To determine the correlation between ocular blood flow velocities and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in glaucoma patients using colour Doppler imaging (CDI) waveform analysis. METHOD: A prospective, observer-masked, case-control study was performed. OPA and blood flow variables from central retinal artery and vein (CRA, CRV), nasal and temporal short posterior ciliary arteries (NPCA, TPCA) and ophthalmic artery (OA) were obtained through dynamic contour tonometry and CDI, respectively. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to explore the correlations between OPA and retrobulbar CDI waveform and systemic cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, blood pressure amplitude, mean ocular perfusion pressure and peripheral pulse). RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients were included [healthy controls: 55; primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG): 74; normal-tension glaucoma (NTG): 63]. OPA was statistically different between groups (Healthy: 3.17 ± 1.2 mmHg; NTG: 2.58 ± 1.2 mmHg; POAG: 2.60 ± 1.1 mmHg; p < 0.01), but not between the glaucoma groups (p = 0.60). Multiple regression models to explain OPA variance were made for each cohort (healthy: p < 0.001, r = 0.605; NTG: p = 0.003, r = 0.372; POAG: p < 0.001, r = 0.412). OPA was independently associated with retrobulbar CDI parameters in the healthy subjects and POAG patients (healthy CRV resistance index: β = 3.37, CI: 0.16-6.59; healthy NPCA mean systolic/diastolic velocity ratio: β = 1.34, CI: 0.52-2.15; POAG TPCA mean systolic velocity: β = 0.14, CI 0.05-0.23). OPA in the NTG group was associated with diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate (β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.01; β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular-related models provide a better explanation to OPA variance in healthy individuals than in glaucoma patients. The variables that influence OPA seem to be different in healthy, POAG and NTG patients.John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São JoséAbegão Pinto, LVandewalle, EWillekens, KMarques-Neves, CStalmans, I2016-01-20T12:56:39Z2014-062014-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2364eng10.1111/aos.12340info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-06T16:48:44Zoai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/2364Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:19:58.856838Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
title Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
spellingShingle Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
Abegão Pinto, L
CHLC OFT
Aged
Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Pressure/physiology
Case-Control Studies
Ciliary Arteries/physiology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology
Intraocular Pressure/physiology
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
Low Tension Glaucoma/physiopathology
Prospective Studies
Pulse Wave Analysis
Retinal Artery/physiology
Retinal Vein/physiology
Single-Blind Method
Tonometry, Ocular
Glaucoma, Primary Open Angle
title_short Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
title_full Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
title_fullStr Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
title_sort Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients
author Abegão Pinto, L
author_facet Abegão Pinto, L
Vandewalle, E
Willekens, K
Marques-Neves, C
Stalmans, I
author_role author
author2 Vandewalle, E
Willekens, K
Marques-Neves, C
Stalmans, I
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abegão Pinto, L
Vandewalle, E
Willekens, K
Marques-Neves, C
Stalmans, I
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CHLC OFT
Aged
Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Pressure/physiology
Case-Control Studies
Ciliary Arteries/physiology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology
Intraocular Pressure/physiology
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
Low Tension Glaucoma/physiopathology
Prospective Studies
Pulse Wave Analysis
Retinal Artery/physiology
Retinal Vein/physiology
Single-Blind Method
Tonometry, Ocular
Glaucoma, Primary Open Angle
topic CHLC OFT
Aged
Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Pressure/physiology
Case-Control Studies
Ciliary Arteries/physiology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology
Intraocular Pressure/physiology
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
Low Tension Glaucoma/physiopathology
Prospective Studies
Pulse Wave Analysis
Retinal Artery/physiology
Retinal Vein/physiology
Single-Blind Method
Tonometry, Ocular
Glaucoma, Primary Open Angle
description PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between ocular blood flow velocities and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in glaucoma patients using colour Doppler imaging (CDI) waveform analysis. METHOD: A prospective, observer-masked, case-control study was performed. OPA and blood flow variables from central retinal artery and vein (CRA, CRV), nasal and temporal short posterior ciliary arteries (NPCA, TPCA) and ophthalmic artery (OA) were obtained through dynamic contour tonometry and CDI, respectively. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to explore the correlations between OPA and retrobulbar CDI waveform and systemic cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, blood pressure amplitude, mean ocular perfusion pressure and peripheral pulse). RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients were included [healthy controls: 55; primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG): 74; normal-tension glaucoma (NTG): 63]. OPA was statistically different between groups (Healthy: 3.17 ± 1.2 mmHg; NTG: 2.58 ± 1.2 mmHg; POAG: 2.60 ± 1.1 mmHg; p < 0.01), but not between the glaucoma groups (p = 0.60). Multiple regression models to explain OPA variance were made for each cohort (healthy: p < 0.001, r = 0.605; NTG: p = 0.003, r = 0.372; POAG: p < 0.001, r = 0.412). OPA was independently associated with retrobulbar CDI parameters in the healthy subjects and POAG patients (healthy CRV resistance index: β = 3.37, CI: 0.16-6.59; healthy NPCA mean systolic/diastolic velocity ratio: β = 1.34, CI: 0.52-2.15; POAG TPCA mean systolic velocity: β = 0.14, CI 0.05-0.23). OPA in the NTG group was associated with diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate (β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.01; β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular-related models provide a better explanation to OPA variance in healthy individuals than in glaucoma patients. The variables that influence OPA seem to be different in healthy, POAG and NTG patients.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
2014-06-01T00:00:00Z
2016-01-20T12:56:39Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2364
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2364
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/aos.12340
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600489900474368