Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcelino, Gisela
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: Carvalho, Nuno, Oliveira, Gabriel, Marialva, Celso, Campanha, Rafaela, Albergaria, Diogo, Santos, Carlos, Lebre, Rui, Corte-Real, João
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
Summary: Background: Patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) and Hinchey<III may also need surgery. Therefore, as other markers are needed to help deciding which patients should be operated on, we tried to test the value of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and of blood cell count (and their ratios). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our surgical department between 2009 and 2011 with the diagnosis of AD. Only cases with a computed tomography confirmation were included in the study.Results: 174 patients (147 men, 27 women, age range 24-93 years) presented with AD. 161 patients had a modified Hinchey classification <III and 17 patients were submitted to surgery (7 had Hinchey III or IV and 10 had Hinchey<III). The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) had the best discriminant value in deciding for a surgical procedure in the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve. NER discriminated non-surgical and surgical treatment with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.92). The cut-off>244.25 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 44-98%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 79-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.85 (95% CI, 3.40-10.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.80). In fact, NER>244.25 successfully predicted 15 out of 17 cases that were operated on in our sample. Conclusions: NER is a good marker in discriminating those that should be operated on regardless of the Hinchey category. However, more studies are needed to confirm these data.
id RCAP_cec5c71a0c209096ffc6b5174c0c25bc
oai_identifier_str oai:revista.spcir.com:article/393
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitisAcute diverticulitisC-reactive proteinNeutrophil-to-eosinophil ratioSurgeryBackground: Patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) and Hinchey<III may also need surgery. Therefore, as other markers are needed to help deciding which patients should be operated on, we tried to test the value of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and of blood cell count (and their ratios). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our surgical department between 2009 and 2011 with the diagnosis of AD. Only cases with a computed tomography confirmation were included in the study.Results: 174 patients (147 men, 27 women, age range 24-93 years) presented with AD. 161 patients had a modified Hinchey classification <III and 17 patients were submitted to surgery (7 had Hinchey III or IV and 10 had Hinchey<III). The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) had the best discriminant value in deciding for a surgical procedure in the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve. NER discriminated non-surgical and surgical treatment with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.92). The cut-off>244.25 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 44-98%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 79-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.85 (95% CI, 3.40-10.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.80). In fact, NER>244.25 successfully predicted 15 out of 17 cases that were operated on in our sample. Conclusions: NER is a good marker in discriminating those that should be operated on regardless of the Hinchey category. However, more studies are needed to confirm these data.Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2015-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No. 33 (2015): Number 33 - June 2015; 11-19Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; N.º 33 (2015): Número 33 - Junho 2015; 11-192183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393/390Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarcelino, GiselaCarvalho, NunoOliveira, GabrielMarialva, CelsoCampanha, RafaelaAlbergaria, DiogoSantos, CarlosLebre, RuiCorte-Real, João2024-10-24T16:52:26Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/393Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:00:34.229083Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
spellingShingle Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
Marcelino, Gisela
Acute diverticulitis
C-reactive protein
Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio
Surgery
title_short Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_full Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_fullStr Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_full_unstemmed Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_sort Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
author Marcelino, Gisela
author_facet Marcelino, Gisela
Carvalho, Nuno
Oliveira, Gabriel
Marialva, Celso
Campanha, Rafaela
Albergaria, Diogo
Santos, Carlos
Lebre, Rui
Corte-Real, João
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Nuno
Oliveira, Gabriel
Marialva, Celso
Campanha, Rafaela
Albergaria, Diogo
Santos, Carlos
Lebre, Rui
Corte-Real, João
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcelino, Gisela
Carvalho, Nuno
Oliveira, Gabriel
Marialva, Celso
Campanha, Rafaela
Albergaria, Diogo
Santos, Carlos
Lebre, Rui
Corte-Real, João
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acute diverticulitis
C-reactive protein
Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio
Surgery
topic Acute diverticulitis
C-reactive protein
Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio
Surgery
description Background: Patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) and Hinchey<III may also need surgery. Therefore, as other markers are needed to help deciding which patients should be operated on, we tried to test the value of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and of blood cell count (and their ratios). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our surgical department between 2009 and 2011 with the diagnosis of AD. Only cases with a computed tomography confirmation were included in the study.Results: 174 patients (147 men, 27 women, age range 24-93 years) presented with AD. 161 patients had a modified Hinchey classification <III and 17 patients were submitted to surgery (7 had Hinchey III or IV and 10 had Hinchey<III). The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) had the best discriminant value in deciding for a surgical procedure in the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve. NER discriminated non-surgical and surgical treatment with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.92). The cut-off>244.25 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 44-98%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 79-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.85 (95% CI, 3.40-10.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.80). In fact, NER>244.25 successfully predicted 15 out of 17 cases that were operated on in our sample. Conclusions: NER is a good marker in discriminating those that should be operated on regardless of the Hinchey category. However, more studies are needed to confirm these data.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
url https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393/390
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No. 33 (2015): Number 33 - June 2015; 11-19
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; N.º 33 (2015): Número 33 - Junho 2015; 11-19
2183-1165
1646-6918
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597814470344704