Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Draper, David
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Laguna, Emilio, Marques, Isabel
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49259
Summary: Interspecific hybridization is one of the most controversial—and usually neglected— issues in conservation due to its multiple evolutionary consequences that might include the origin and transfer of adaptations, the blur of distinctive lineages or the formation of maladaptive hybrids. However, despite different outcomes, most conservation laws do not offer any possibility of hybrids being protected since they are perceived as a threat to the survival of pure species. We assessed how much hybridization has contributed to species extinction considering all IUCN Red Data assessments. However, we found that it has been scarcely reported as a threat contributing to extinction: only 11 extinct species out of 120,369 assessments mentioned hybridization. Although the causes that contribute to species extinctions should be controlled, the reasons for not conserving hybrids seem subjective rather than empirically supported. In a genomic era where hybridization is being more frequently detected, the debate involving the conservation of hybrids should be re-opened. Should we conserve hybrids despite the possibility of gene flow with parental species? Should we protect only natural hybrids? The resolution of this debate goes to the heart of what we mean to conserve and the time scale of conservation. But hybridization is part of the evolutionary process and might even increase in the future due to human-induced changes. As such, it becomes clear that we need to move beyond the causes and instead tackle the consequences of hybridization to create environmental policies for the management of hybrids, considering both positive and negative consequences.
id RCAP_cc821ed42a99e933b2949275d9bbb548
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/49259
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policieshybridsspecies extinctionconservationenvironmental policieshabitat threatsInterspecific hybridization is one of the most controversial—and usually neglected— issues in conservation due to its multiple evolutionary consequences that might include the origin and transfer of adaptations, the blur of distinctive lineages or the formation of maladaptive hybrids. However, despite different outcomes, most conservation laws do not offer any possibility of hybrids being protected since they are perceived as a threat to the survival of pure species. We assessed how much hybridization has contributed to species extinction considering all IUCN Red Data assessments. However, we found that it has been scarcely reported as a threat contributing to extinction: only 11 extinct species out of 120,369 assessments mentioned hybridization. Although the causes that contribute to species extinctions should be controlled, the reasons for not conserving hybrids seem subjective rather than empirically supported. In a genomic era where hybridization is being more frequently detected, the debate involving the conservation of hybrids should be re-opened. Should we conserve hybrids despite the possibility of gene flow with parental species? Should we protect only natural hybrids? The resolution of this debate goes to the heart of what we mean to conserve and the time scale of conservation. But hybridization is part of the evolutionary process and might even increase in the future due to human-induced changes. As such, it becomes clear that we need to move beyond the causes and instead tackle the consequences of hybridization to create environmental policies for the management of hybrids, considering both positive and negative consequences.FrontiersRepositório da Universidade de LisboaDraper, DavidLaguna, EmilioMarques, Isabel2021-08-05T15:13:45Z2021-052021-05-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/49259engDraper D, Laguna E and Marques I (2021) Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9:637100. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.6371002296-701X10.3389/fevo.2021.637100info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-17T14:36:27Zoai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/49259Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T03:16:52.379330Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
title Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
spellingShingle Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
Draper, David
hybrids
species extinction
conservation
environmental policies
habitat threats
title_short Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
title_full Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
title_fullStr Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
title_full_unstemmed Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
title_sort Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies
author Draper, David
author_facet Draper, David
Laguna, Emilio
Marques, Isabel
author_role author
author2 Laguna, Emilio
Marques, Isabel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Draper, David
Laguna, Emilio
Marques, Isabel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hybrids
species extinction
conservation
environmental policies
habitat threats
topic hybrids
species extinction
conservation
environmental policies
habitat threats
description Interspecific hybridization is one of the most controversial—and usually neglected— issues in conservation due to its multiple evolutionary consequences that might include the origin and transfer of adaptations, the blur of distinctive lineages or the formation of maladaptive hybrids. However, despite different outcomes, most conservation laws do not offer any possibility of hybrids being protected since they are perceived as a threat to the survival of pure species. We assessed how much hybridization has contributed to species extinction considering all IUCN Red Data assessments. However, we found that it has been scarcely reported as a threat contributing to extinction: only 11 extinct species out of 120,369 assessments mentioned hybridization. Although the causes that contribute to species extinctions should be controlled, the reasons for not conserving hybrids seem subjective rather than empirically supported. In a genomic era where hybridization is being more frequently detected, the debate involving the conservation of hybrids should be re-opened. Should we conserve hybrids despite the possibility of gene flow with parental species? Should we protect only natural hybrids? The resolution of this debate goes to the heart of what we mean to conserve and the time scale of conservation. But hybridization is part of the evolutionary process and might even increase in the future due to human-induced changes. As such, it becomes clear that we need to move beyond the causes and instead tackle the consequences of hybridization to create environmental policies for the management of hybrids, considering both positive and negative consequences.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-05T15:13:45Z
2021-05
2021-05-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49259
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49259
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Draper D, Laguna E and Marques I (2021) Demystifying Negative Connotations of Hybridization for Less Biased Conservation Policies. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9:637100. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.637100
2296-701X
10.3389/fevo.2021.637100
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833601650195955712