Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rita Mota de Miranda
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149949
Resumo: This Master's term paper aims to focus on Valmor Award's last twenty years (it was founded in 1902), period in which this merged with the Municipal Architecture Award and in which its regulation was redrawned - from 1982 to 2002. The award intended to recognize, every year, the "most beautiful building, or built house in Lisbon"*. A hundred and eight years after its institution, this award, besides it's seniority and unrivalled popularity between the common citizen (besides architects), even if only in the city of Lisbon, has resisted to the passage of time and several apparent abandons, contributing towards a general architecture panorama, in that city and a bit all over the country, throughout these years. Regarding this, and to contextualize eras and architectures, a brief analysis of the first eighty years is made, emphasizing the social-political climate of each moment, as well as its respective decisions and important marks. Justified by instability climates, uncertainty and/or oppression, some significant pieces that were put apart from the awarded list are also mentioned. Actually, this is another of the curious characteristics of the award: even if not all the nominations correspond, faithfully, to the best architecture developed in the city and even less in the country, they can't help show, for the good and not so good examples, what were the tendencies and predominant tastes corresponding to each era, allowing a critical analysis of the city's architecture throughout them. After this historical appreciation and revision of all the changes that occurred on the award's regulation, we entered in the main focus of this dissertation, wishing with it, not only to portrait what was Lisbon architecturally over the last years, through the approach and systematic analysis of the awarded pieces with the Valmor and Municipal Architecture Award, but also contextualizing political and socially. For that, I resorted to authors like José Manuel Pedreirinho, José Manuel Fernandes or Marina Tavares Dias, between others, for a global analysis; to sporadic publications of critics regarding each piece or the award itself, as well of the own architects authorship; and also to the research and collection of information at Lisbon Municipal Archives ("Arco do Cego" and "Intermédio"), as of minutes, regulation and construction site volumes. As a requiem, this test wishes to catch the attention not only for the negligence and lack of attention that architecture still suffers from in Portugal, but also for the lack of critic and political influences that fail to contribute to the communication of a clear and significant message, especially to classes unfamiliar to it.
id RCAP_c8a6dc00cdeccac16406f1d59e8a6c94
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/149949
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de ArquitecturaArtesArtsThis Master's term paper aims to focus on Valmor Award's last twenty years (it was founded in 1902), period in which this merged with the Municipal Architecture Award and in which its regulation was redrawned - from 1982 to 2002. The award intended to recognize, every year, the "most beautiful building, or built house in Lisbon"*. A hundred and eight years after its institution, this award, besides it's seniority and unrivalled popularity between the common citizen (besides architects), even if only in the city of Lisbon, has resisted to the passage of time and several apparent abandons, contributing towards a general architecture panorama, in that city and a bit all over the country, throughout these years. Regarding this, and to contextualize eras and architectures, a brief analysis of the first eighty years is made, emphasizing the social-political climate of each moment, as well as its respective decisions and important marks. Justified by instability climates, uncertainty and/or oppression, some significant pieces that were put apart from the awarded list are also mentioned. Actually, this is another of the curious characteristics of the award: even if not all the nominations correspond, faithfully, to the best architecture developed in the city and even less in the country, they can't help show, for the good and not so good examples, what were the tendencies and predominant tastes corresponding to each era, allowing a critical analysis of the city's architecture throughout them. After this historical appreciation and revision of all the changes that occurred on the award's regulation, we entered in the main focus of this dissertation, wishing with it, not only to portrait what was Lisbon architecturally over the last years, through the approach and systematic analysis of the awarded pieces with the Valmor and Municipal Architecture Award, but also contextualizing political and socially. For that, I resorted to authors like José Manuel Pedreirinho, José Manuel Fernandes or Marina Tavares Dias, between others, for a global analysis; to sporadic publications of critics regarding each piece or the award itself, as well of the own architects authorship; and also to the research and collection of information at Lisbon Municipal Archives ("Arco do Cego" and "Intermédio"), as of minutes, regulation and construction site volumes. As a requiem, this test wishes to catch the attention not only for the negligence and lack of attention that architecture still suffers from in Portugal, but also for the lack of critic and political influences that fail to contribute to the communication of a clear and significant message, especially to classes unfamiliar to it.2010-12-092010-12-09T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/149949porRita Mota de Mirandainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-27T19:46:27Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/149949Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T23:31:42.686701Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
title Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
spellingShingle Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
Rita Mota de Miranda
Artes
Arts
title_short Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
title_full Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
title_fullStr Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
title_full_unstemmed Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
title_sort Os Últimos Vinte Anos do Prémio Valmor e Municipal de Arquitectura
author Rita Mota de Miranda
author_facet Rita Mota de Miranda
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rita Mota de Miranda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artes
Arts
topic Artes
Arts
description This Master's term paper aims to focus on Valmor Award's last twenty years (it was founded in 1902), period in which this merged with the Municipal Architecture Award and in which its regulation was redrawned - from 1982 to 2002. The award intended to recognize, every year, the "most beautiful building, or built house in Lisbon"*. A hundred and eight years after its institution, this award, besides it's seniority and unrivalled popularity between the common citizen (besides architects), even if only in the city of Lisbon, has resisted to the passage of time and several apparent abandons, contributing towards a general architecture panorama, in that city and a bit all over the country, throughout these years. Regarding this, and to contextualize eras and architectures, a brief analysis of the first eighty years is made, emphasizing the social-political climate of each moment, as well as its respective decisions and important marks. Justified by instability climates, uncertainty and/or oppression, some significant pieces that were put apart from the awarded list are also mentioned. Actually, this is another of the curious characteristics of the award: even if not all the nominations correspond, faithfully, to the best architecture developed in the city and even less in the country, they can't help show, for the good and not so good examples, what were the tendencies and predominant tastes corresponding to each era, allowing a critical analysis of the city's architecture throughout them. After this historical appreciation and revision of all the changes that occurred on the award's regulation, we entered in the main focus of this dissertation, wishing with it, not only to portrait what was Lisbon architecturally over the last years, through the approach and systematic analysis of the awarded pieces with the Valmor and Municipal Architecture Award, but also contextualizing political and socially. For that, I resorted to authors like José Manuel Pedreirinho, José Manuel Fernandes or Marina Tavares Dias, between others, for a global analysis; to sporadic publications of critics regarding each piece or the award itself, as well of the own architects authorship; and also to the research and collection of information at Lisbon Municipal Archives ("Arco do Cego" and "Intermédio"), as of minutes, regulation and construction site volumes. As a requiem, this test wishes to catch the attention not only for the negligence and lack of attention that architecture still suffers from in Portugal, but also for the lack of critic and political influences that fail to contribute to the communication of a clear and significant message, especially to classes unfamiliar to it.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-09
2010-12-09T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149949
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149949
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600190266736641