Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cruz, Joana
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Marques, Alda, Souto-Miranda, Sara, Goldstein, Roger, Brooks, Dina
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4019
Summary: Caring for a relative with COPD influences multiple dimensions of carers' lives. Several instruments have been used to assess the caregiving experience in COPD,1 e.g. the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). This instrument was originally developed for use in carers of people with dementia, however, its applicability in COPD has not been tested. This study explored the content validity of the ZBI in carers of patients with COPD. Ten carers (68.2±6.9yrs, all female) of patients with COPD (74.7±5.3yrs, all male, FEV1=49.2±19.0%pred) participated in cognitive debriefing interviews. They were asked to complete the ZBI and verbalise their thinking process to assess the adequacy of its content and instructions. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for further analysis using the qualitative data analysis software (WebQDA). Responses to the ZBI were also analysed to explore floor/ceiling effects. From the 22 items of the ZBI, 6 items were relevant for all carers and 11 items were not relevant for at least one participant. Five of these 11 items were not relevant for ≥40% of the sample and were related to stress for providing care, embarrassment about patient’s behaviour and impacts on social/leisure time. The remaining 5 items were not consensual. Overall, the ZBI was well-understood although 8 items were less clear for some carers. They suggested: improving questions (n=1) and scoring (n=5); eliminating item 4 (n=2); including 2 questions about the caregiving context (n=1). Responses were mostly distributed in the option ‘Never/Not at all’. The ZBI in its current form should not be used to assess carer experience among those caring for patients with COPD. 1Cruz, J et al. Resp Med 2017;128:13-27
id RCAP_c85d94cfbcd1e0d0bee06e36c1988025
oai_identifier_str oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/4019
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden InterviewChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCaregiverCarerDistressCaring for a relative with COPD influences multiple dimensions of carers' lives. Several instruments have been used to assess the caregiving experience in COPD,1 e.g. the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). This instrument was originally developed for use in carers of people with dementia, however, its applicability in COPD has not been tested. This study explored the content validity of the ZBI in carers of patients with COPD. Ten carers (68.2±6.9yrs, all female) of patients with COPD (74.7±5.3yrs, all male, FEV1=49.2±19.0%pred) participated in cognitive debriefing interviews. They were asked to complete the ZBI and verbalise their thinking process to assess the adequacy of its content and instructions. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for further analysis using the qualitative data analysis software (WebQDA). Responses to the ZBI were also analysed to explore floor/ceiling effects. From the 22 items of the ZBI, 6 items were relevant for all carers and 11 items were not relevant for at least one participant. Five of these 11 items were not relevant for ≥40% of the sample and were related to stress for providing care, embarrassment about patient’s behaviour and impacts on social/leisure time. The remaining 5 items were not consensual. Overall, the ZBI was well-understood although 8 items were less clear for some carers. They suggested: improving questions (n=1) and scoring (n=5); eliminating item 4 (n=2); including 2 questions about the caregiving context (n=1). Responses were mostly distributed in the option ‘Never/Not at all’. The ZBI in its current form should not be used to assess carer experience among those caring for patients with COPD. 1Cruz, J et al. Resp Med 2017;128:13-27Repositório IC-OnlineCruz, JoanaMarques, AldaSouto-Miranda, SaraGoldstein, RogerBrooks, Dina2019-07-23T15:23:45Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4019eng10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.PA1495info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-25T15:09:40Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/4019Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T20:48:43.363876Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
title Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
spellingShingle Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
Cruz, Joana
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Caregiver
Carer
Distress
title_short Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
title_full Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
title_fullStr Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
title_full_unstemmed Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
title_sort Assessing caregiving experience in COPD: content validity of the Zarit Burden Interview
author Cruz, Joana
author_facet Cruz, Joana
Marques, Alda
Souto-Miranda, Sara
Goldstein, Roger
Brooks, Dina
author_role author
author2 Marques, Alda
Souto-Miranda, Sara
Goldstein, Roger
Brooks, Dina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório IC-Online
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Joana
Marques, Alda
Souto-Miranda, Sara
Goldstein, Roger
Brooks, Dina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Caregiver
Carer
Distress
topic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Caregiver
Carer
Distress
description Caring for a relative with COPD influences multiple dimensions of carers' lives. Several instruments have been used to assess the caregiving experience in COPD,1 e.g. the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). This instrument was originally developed for use in carers of people with dementia, however, its applicability in COPD has not been tested. This study explored the content validity of the ZBI in carers of patients with COPD. Ten carers (68.2±6.9yrs, all female) of patients with COPD (74.7±5.3yrs, all male, FEV1=49.2±19.0%pred) participated in cognitive debriefing interviews. They were asked to complete the ZBI and verbalise their thinking process to assess the adequacy of its content and instructions. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for further analysis using the qualitative data analysis software (WebQDA). Responses to the ZBI were also analysed to explore floor/ceiling effects. From the 22 items of the ZBI, 6 items were relevant for all carers and 11 items were not relevant for at least one participant. Five of these 11 items were not relevant for ≥40% of the sample and were related to stress for providing care, embarrassment about patient’s behaviour and impacts on social/leisure time. The remaining 5 items were not consensual. Overall, the ZBI was well-understood although 8 items were less clear for some carers. They suggested: improving questions (n=1) and scoring (n=5); eliminating item 4 (n=2); including 2 questions about the caregiving context (n=1). Responses were mostly distributed in the option ‘Never/Not at all’. The ZBI in its current form should not be used to assess carer experience among those caring for patients with COPD. 1Cruz, J et al. Resp Med 2017;128:13-27
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-07-23T15:23:45Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4019
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.PA1495
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598886681247744