Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2012 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5.10969 |
Summary: | Objectives: The objective of this review is to compare treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and low- molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for superficial thrombophlebitis (ST) of the lower limb. Data sources: We searched the PubMed database, evidence-based medicine websites, the General Directorate of Health websi- te, the Portuguese Association of General Practitioners website, MGFamiliar.net, and the Index of Portuguese Medical Magazines. Review methods: We selected clinical guidelines (CG), computerized decision support systems (CS), systematic reviews (SR) and original studies, published between January 2008 and May 2011, using the MeSH terms venous thrombosis, heparin, low molecular weight, and anti-inflammatory agents. American Family Physician's Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) was used to assess the level of evidence. Results: 215 articles were obtained. We selected one CG, one CS, one SR and one randomized clinical trial (RCT) for this review. The evidence found suggests that LMWH or NSAIDs are superior to placebo in the treatment of symptoms of ST, and in redu- cing the incidence of recurrences and complications, without differences in their safety profile in the short term (level of evi- dence 2). The evidence also confirms anticoagulation as the first line of therapy (level of evidence 2). The simultaneous use of LMWH and NSAID was found to be more effective for symptomatic relief than LMWH alone in one RCT (level of evidence 2). Conclusions: There is evidence for the use of LMWH and NSAID as first-line treatment for ST (SOR B). Anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks is indicated especially when the following criteria are present: anatomical proximity of the thrombus to the deep venous system and medical risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (SOR B). More randomized clinical trials are needed, comparing LMWH and NSAID, evaluating the simultaneous use of these drugs, and assessing the proper dose and duration of treatment. |
id |
RCAP_c705d0ffaa003b59570e79b8d2c23f2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/10969 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs?Tratamento médico da tromboflebite superficial do membro inferior: Heparina ou anti-inflamatórios?thrombophlebitisheparinanti-inflammatorytherapeuticsTromboflebiteHeparinaAnti-inflamatóriosTerapêuticaObjectives: The objective of this review is to compare treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and low- molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for superficial thrombophlebitis (ST) of the lower limb. Data sources: We searched the PubMed database, evidence-based medicine websites, the General Directorate of Health websi- te, the Portuguese Association of General Practitioners website, MGFamiliar.net, and the Index of Portuguese Medical Magazines. Review methods: We selected clinical guidelines (CG), computerized decision support systems (CS), systematic reviews (SR) and original studies, published between January 2008 and May 2011, using the MeSH terms venous thrombosis, heparin, low molecular weight, and anti-inflammatory agents. American Family Physician's Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) was used to assess the level of evidence. Results: 215 articles were obtained. We selected one CG, one CS, one SR and one randomized clinical trial (RCT) for this review. The evidence found suggests that LMWH or NSAIDs are superior to placebo in the treatment of symptoms of ST, and in redu- cing the incidence of recurrences and complications, without differences in their safety profile in the short term (level of evi- dence 2). The evidence also confirms anticoagulation as the first line of therapy (level of evidence 2). The simultaneous use of LMWH and NSAID was found to be more effective for symptomatic relief than LMWH alone in one RCT (level of evidence 2). Conclusions: There is evidence for the use of LMWH and NSAID as first-line treatment for ST (SOR B). Anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks is indicated especially when the following criteria are present: anatomical proximity of the thrombus to the deep venous system and medical risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (SOR B). More randomized clinical trials are needed, comparing LMWH and NSAID, evaluating the simultaneous use of these drugs, and assessing the proper dose and duration of treatment.Objectivos: Clarificar qual a melhor terapêutica da tromboflebite superficial (TS) do membro inferior, com principal enfoque na comparação entre anti-inflamatórios (AINE) e heparina de baixo peso molecular (HBPM). Fontes de dados: Base de dados Pubmed, sites de medicina baseada na evidência, Direcção-Geral de Saúde, Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar, MGFamiliar.net e Índex de Revistas Médicas Portuguesas. Métodos de revisão: Pesquisa de normas de orientação clínica (NOC), sistemas computorizados de apoio à decisão (SCAD), revisões sistemáticas (RS) e artigos originais, publicados entre Janeiro/2008 e Maio/2011, utilizando os termos MeSH: venous thrombosis; heparin, low-molecular-weight; anti-inflammatory agents. Para avaliar o nível de evidência, foi utilizada a escala Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) da American Family Physician. Resultados: Foram obtidos 215 artigos, seleccionando-se uma NOC, um SCAD, uma RS e um ensaio clínico aelatorizado (ECA). As evidências sugerem que existe melhoria dos sintomas dos doentes com TS tratados com HBPM ou AINE em comparação com placebo, reduzindo a incidência de recorrências e complicações, sem diferenças no perfil de segurança a curto prazo (nível de evidência 2). Também destacam a anticoagulação como terapêutica de primeira linha (nível de evidência 2). A utilização simultânea de HBPM e AINE revelou maior eficácia no alívio sintomático do que a HBPM isolada num ECA (nível de evidência 2). Conclusões: A HBPM e os AINE são duas opções terapêuticas com evidências que suportam a sua utilização como primeira linha de tratamento (SOR B). A anticoagulação durante pelo menos 4 semanas está indicada sobretudo quando se identificam critérios de gravidade: proximidade anatómica do trombo com o sistema venoso profundo e factores de risco médicos para trombose venosa profunda (SOR B). São necessários mais ECA, sobretudo no que se relaciona com a opção por AINE ou HBPM ou a sua utilização simultânea, doses e duração de tratamento.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2012-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5.10969https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5.10969Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 28 No. 5 (2012): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 351-6Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 28 Núm. 5 (2012): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 351-6Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 28 N.º 5 (2012): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 351-62182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v28i5reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10969https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10969/10704Botas, PhilippePimenta, JoséSantos, Pedro GonçaloSantiago, Luiz Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:34Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/10969Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:51:44.955401Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? Tratamento médico da tromboflebite superficial do membro inferior: Heparina ou anti-inflamatórios? |
title |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? |
spellingShingle |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? Botas, Philippe thrombophlebitis heparin anti-inflammatory therapeutics Tromboflebite Heparina Anti-inflamatórios Terapêutica |
title_short |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? |
title_full |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? |
title_fullStr |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? |
title_sort |
Medical treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limb: Heparin or anti-inflammatory drugs? |
author |
Botas, Philippe |
author_facet |
Botas, Philippe Pimenta, José Santos, Pedro Gonçalo Santiago, Luiz Miguel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pimenta, José Santos, Pedro Gonçalo Santiago, Luiz Miguel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Botas, Philippe Pimenta, José Santos, Pedro Gonçalo Santiago, Luiz Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
thrombophlebitis heparin anti-inflammatory therapeutics Tromboflebite Heparina Anti-inflamatórios Terapêutica |
topic |
thrombophlebitis heparin anti-inflammatory therapeutics Tromboflebite Heparina Anti-inflamatórios Terapêutica |
description |
Objectives: The objective of this review is to compare treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and low- molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for superficial thrombophlebitis (ST) of the lower limb. Data sources: We searched the PubMed database, evidence-based medicine websites, the General Directorate of Health websi- te, the Portuguese Association of General Practitioners website, MGFamiliar.net, and the Index of Portuguese Medical Magazines. Review methods: We selected clinical guidelines (CG), computerized decision support systems (CS), systematic reviews (SR) and original studies, published between January 2008 and May 2011, using the MeSH terms venous thrombosis, heparin, low molecular weight, and anti-inflammatory agents. American Family Physician's Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) was used to assess the level of evidence. Results: 215 articles were obtained. We selected one CG, one CS, one SR and one randomized clinical trial (RCT) for this review. The evidence found suggests that LMWH or NSAIDs are superior to placebo in the treatment of symptoms of ST, and in redu- cing the incidence of recurrences and complications, without differences in their safety profile in the short term (level of evi- dence 2). The evidence also confirms anticoagulation as the first line of therapy (level of evidence 2). The simultaneous use of LMWH and NSAID was found to be more effective for symptomatic relief than LMWH alone in one RCT (level of evidence 2). Conclusions: There is evidence for the use of LMWH and NSAID as first-line treatment for ST (SOR B). Anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks is indicated especially when the following criteria are present: anatomical proximity of the thrombus to the deep venous system and medical risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (SOR B). More randomized clinical trials are needed, comparing LMWH and NSAID, evaluating the simultaneous use of these drugs, and assessing the proper dose and duration of treatment. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5.10969 https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5.10969 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5.10969 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10969 https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10969/10704 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 28 No. 5 (2012): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 351-6 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 28 Núm. 5 (2012): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 351-6 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 28 N.º 5 (2012): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 351-6 2182-5181 2182-5173 10.32385/rpmgf.v28i5 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597713725259776 |