Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
| Outros Autores: | , |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/7785 |
Resumo: | Introduction - Significant improvements have been made in Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) to enhance the image quality, namely, the development of time-of-flight (TOF) technology. This technique is useful to localize the emission point of the beta plus-emitter (β+) radiopharmaceutical inside the body, allowing better lesion contrast, especially for large patients, improving structural details and leading to a short scan time. The main goal of this study is to verify the shortest acquisition time per bed position, in a TOF PET scanner, without compromising the image quality, in both phantom and clinical imaging. Methods - For that purpose, images of a torso NEMA phantom were acquired with different acquisition times per bed position (30, 45, 60, 80 and 120 s) in a TOF PET/CT scanner (GEMINI TF 16, Philips), using Gallium-68 (68Ga) citrate. Clinical images were also acquired of an aleatory patient (male, 64 y) with 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Image quality parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) and quantification in terms of standardized uptake value (SUV) were acquired. Results - The increased contrast and CRC in larger spheres and with longer acquisition times produces an increase on the noise, leading to a decrease in SNR and CNR. In phantom imaging, SUVmax varied between 1.1 and 1.6 for background (normal uptake) and between 2.1 and 8.0 for spheres (abnormal uptake). A strong correlation was found for both SUVmax and SUVmean between the different acquisition times (R>0.7). Inpatient imaging, spleen showed higher SNR, contrast, noise, and CNR than liver. Median SUVmax was 7.1 for liver, 9.8 for spleen and 1.8 for bone. Conclusions - A time between 45 and 60 s per bed position is proposed for future clinical practices, allowing schedule more scans per day, contributing to an optimization of protocols without compromising the image quality. |
| id |
RCAP_c6fe20d79595a09ce8a7e6b218580003 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipl.pt:10400.21/7785 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image qualityPET/CTTOF68GaAcquisition timeImage qualityIntroduction - Significant improvements have been made in Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) to enhance the image quality, namely, the development of time-of-flight (TOF) technology. This technique is useful to localize the emission point of the beta plus-emitter (β+) radiopharmaceutical inside the body, allowing better lesion contrast, especially for large patients, improving structural details and leading to a short scan time. The main goal of this study is to verify the shortest acquisition time per bed position, in a TOF PET scanner, without compromising the image quality, in both phantom and clinical imaging. Methods - For that purpose, images of a torso NEMA phantom were acquired with different acquisition times per bed position (30, 45, 60, 80 and 120 s) in a TOF PET/CT scanner (GEMINI TF 16, Philips), using Gallium-68 (68Ga) citrate. Clinical images were also acquired of an aleatory patient (male, 64 y) with 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Image quality parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) and quantification in terms of standardized uptake value (SUV) were acquired. Results - The increased contrast and CRC in larger spheres and with longer acquisition times produces an increase on the noise, leading to a decrease in SNR and CNR. In phantom imaging, SUVmax varied between 1.1 and 1.6 for background (normal uptake) and between 2.1 and 8.0 for spheres (abnormal uptake). A strong correlation was found for both SUVmax and SUVmean between the different acquisition times (R>0.7). Inpatient imaging, spleen showed higher SNR, contrast, noise, and CNR than liver. Median SUVmax was 7.1 for liver, 9.8 for spleen and 1.8 for bone. Conclusions - A time between 45 and 60 s per bed position is proposed for future clinical practices, allowing schedule more scans per day, contributing to an optimization of protocols without compromising the image quality.RCIPLOliveira, JoanaParafita, RuiBranco, Susana2017-12-23T22:03:04Z2017-092017-09-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/7785enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-12T11:05:12Zoai:repositorio.ipl.pt:10400.21/7785Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T20:10:11.231233Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| title |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| spellingShingle |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality Oliveira, Joana PET/CT TOF 68Ga Acquisition time Image quality |
| title_short |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| title_full |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| title_fullStr |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| title_sort |
Minimisation of acquisition time in a TOF PET/CT scanner without compromising image quality |
| author |
Oliveira, Joana |
| author_facet |
Oliveira, Joana Parafita, Rui Branco, Susana |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Parafita, Rui Branco, Susana |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
RCIPL |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Joana Parafita, Rui Branco, Susana |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
PET/CT TOF 68Ga Acquisition time Image quality |
| topic |
PET/CT TOF 68Ga Acquisition time Image quality |
| description |
Introduction - Significant improvements have been made in Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) to enhance the image quality, namely, the development of time-of-flight (TOF) technology. This technique is useful to localize the emission point of the beta plus-emitter (β+) radiopharmaceutical inside the body, allowing better lesion contrast, especially for large patients, improving structural details and leading to a short scan time. The main goal of this study is to verify the shortest acquisition time per bed position, in a TOF PET scanner, without compromising the image quality, in both phantom and clinical imaging. Methods - For that purpose, images of a torso NEMA phantom were acquired with different acquisition times per bed position (30, 45, 60, 80 and 120 s) in a TOF PET/CT scanner (GEMINI TF 16, Philips), using Gallium-68 (68Ga) citrate. Clinical images were also acquired of an aleatory patient (male, 64 y) with 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Image quality parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) and quantification in terms of standardized uptake value (SUV) were acquired. Results - The increased contrast and CRC in larger spheres and with longer acquisition times produces an increase on the noise, leading to a decrease in SNR and CNR. In phantom imaging, SUVmax varied between 1.1 and 1.6 for background (normal uptake) and between 2.1 and 8.0 for spheres (abnormal uptake). A strong correlation was found for both SUVmax and SUVmean between the different acquisition times (R>0.7). Inpatient imaging, spleen showed higher SNR, contrast, noise, and CNR than liver. Median SUVmax was 7.1 for liver, 9.8 for spleen and 1.8 for bone. Conclusions - A time between 45 and 60 s per bed position is proposed for future clinical practices, allowing schedule more scans per day, contributing to an optimization of protocols without compromising the image quality. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-23T22:03:04Z 2017-09 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/7785 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/7785 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833598525183623168 |