Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2025 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171 |
Summary: | Introduction: Research is crucial for building an efficient health system care. This reality is particularly evident in primary care, the cornerstone of healthcare services. However, research in primary care is not consistently implemented across Europe. With this study we aimed to: 1) identify the factors and strategies that healthcare professionals consider relevant for promoting research in primary care in Portugal; 2) analyze whether the prioritized strategies vary according to the geographical area, professional group, workplace, interest, and experience in research of the participants.Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study using an online survey applied in the first semester of 2023. We designed the survey based on strategies identified in a previous qualitative study. We included health professionals working in Primary Care in Portugal (continental and autonomous regions). We intended to obtain at least 200 answers for each professional category and geographical area. The survey was initially sent to a convenience sample to assess the acceptability and interpretation of the questions. We then disseminated the survey through all national Health Center Clusters and through professional associations. We conducted an analysis using a 5% significance level.Results: The sample consisted of 1027 participants: 507 doctors, 377 nurses, 106 diagnostic and therapeutic technicians, and 30 secretaries. The majority worked in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley region (51.9%), followed by the North (22.1%) and Centre (17.1%). Around half of the participants worked in a Family Health Unit, 16.5% worked in a Personalized Healthcare Unit, 11% in a Community Care Unit, and 8.7% in a Public Health Unit. The factors promoting research mentioned by a greater proportion of participants were research training (76%), access to mentors (71%) and grants (56%). As for strategies to promote research, most participants supported the existence of dedicated time for research (82%), public grants (65%), institutional support (51%), access to support services (58%) and research data (57%).Conclusion: There seems to be a consensus on which factors are currently promoting research and what future strategies might be useful for promoting research in primary care in Portugal. Nevertheless, there are some differences between certain sub-groups. This information might be useful to tailor initiatives directed at specific sub-groups. Our intention is to help form policies and strategies to promote research in primary care in Portugal, contributing to the national development on the subject. |
id |
RCAP_c6fd5af811f32d5874445db6bb0b027f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/22171 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional StudyEstratégias e Fatores Promotores da Investigação nos Cuidados Primários em Portugal: Um Estudo TransversalPrimary Health CareResearchResearch DesignCuidados de Saúde PrimáriosInvestigaçãoProjetos de InvestigaçãoIntroduction: Research is crucial for building an efficient health system care. This reality is particularly evident in primary care, the cornerstone of healthcare services. However, research in primary care is not consistently implemented across Europe. With this study we aimed to: 1) identify the factors and strategies that healthcare professionals consider relevant for promoting research in primary care in Portugal; 2) analyze whether the prioritized strategies vary according to the geographical area, professional group, workplace, interest, and experience in research of the participants.Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study using an online survey applied in the first semester of 2023. We designed the survey based on strategies identified in a previous qualitative study. We included health professionals working in Primary Care in Portugal (continental and autonomous regions). We intended to obtain at least 200 answers for each professional category and geographical area. The survey was initially sent to a convenience sample to assess the acceptability and interpretation of the questions. We then disseminated the survey through all national Health Center Clusters and through professional associations. We conducted an analysis using a 5% significance level.Results: The sample consisted of 1027 participants: 507 doctors, 377 nurses, 106 diagnostic and therapeutic technicians, and 30 secretaries. The majority worked in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley region (51.9%), followed by the North (22.1%) and Centre (17.1%). Around half of the participants worked in a Family Health Unit, 16.5% worked in a Personalized Healthcare Unit, 11% in a Community Care Unit, and 8.7% in a Public Health Unit. The factors promoting research mentioned by a greater proportion of participants were research training (76%), access to mentors (71%) and grants (56%). As for strategies to promote research, most participants supported the existence of dedicated time for research (82%), public grants (65%), institutional support (51%), access to support services (58%) and research data (57%).Conclusion: There seems to be a consensus on which factors are currently promoting research and what future strategies might be useful for promoting research in primary care in Portugal. Nevertheless, there are some differences between certain sub-groups. This information might be useful to tailor initiatives directed at specific sub-groups. Our intention is to help form policies and strategies to promote research in primary care in Portugal, contributing to the national development on the subject.Introdução: A investigação constitui uma pedra basilar de um sistema de saúde eficiente. Esta realidade é particularmente evidente nos cuidados de saúde primários, a base do sistema de saúde. Contudo, na Europa, a investigação nesta área não se encontra implementada de forma consistente nem homogénea. Com este estudo pretendemos: 1) identificar os fatores e as estratégias que os profissionais de saúde consideram mais relevantes para promover a investigação nos cuidados de saúde primários em Portugal; 2) analisar se as estratégias priorizadas variam de acordo com a área geográfica, o grupo profissional, o local de trabalho, o interesse e experiência em investigação dos participantes.Métodos: Conduzimos um estudo analítico transversal, utilizando um inquérito online aplicado no primeiro semestre de 2023. Desenhámos o inquérito com base no conhecimento e estratégias obtidas num estudo qualitativo prévio. Incluímos profissionais dos cuidados de saúde primários em Portugal (continental e regiões autónomas), visando um mínimo de 200 participantes por categoria profissional e região geográfica. Selecionámos uma amostra de conveniência para avaliar a aceitabilidade das questões. Posteriormente, divulgámos o inquérito pela totalidade dos Agrupamentos de Centros de Saúde e através de associações profissionais.Resultados: A amostra foi constituída por 1027 participantes: 507 médicos, 377 enfermeiros, 106 técnicos de diagnóstico e terapêutica e 30 assistentes técnicos. A maioria pertencia à região de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (51,9%), seguindo-se o Norte (22,1%) e o Centro (17,1%). Cerca de metade trabalhava numa Unidade de Saúde Familiar, 16,5% numa Unidade de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados, 11% numa Unidade de Cuidados na Comunidade e 8,7% numa Unidade de Saúde Pública. Os fatores promotores da investigação mais comummente referidos foram as oportunidades de formação em investigação (76%), o acesso a mentores (71%) e a bolsas (56%). Quanto às estratégias futuras, a maioria apoiou a existência de tempo dedicado à investigação (82%), bolsas públicas (65%), o apoio institucional (51%), o acesso a serviços de apoio (58%) e a dados para investigação (57%). Conclusão: Parece existir um consenso acerca dos fatores que promovem a investigação e quais as estratégias que poderão promover a investigação nos cuidados primários em Portugal. Verificam-se, contudo, algumas diferenças entre determinados subgrupos. Esta informação poderá ser útil para adaptar iniciativas dirigidas a subgrupos específicos. A nossa intenção é ajudar a formar políticas e estratégias para promover a investigação nos cuidados primários em Portugal, contribuindo para o desenvolvimento nacional nesta área.Ordem dos Médicos2025-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2025): March; 137-147Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 38 N.º 3 (2025): Março; 137-1471646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPengporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171/15614https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171/15609https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171/15610Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorgado, Maria BeatrizPenedo, CarolinaCorreia, RubinaAmaral, Sandra DinizNicola, Paulo JorgeGil Conde, Margarida2025-03-09T03:01:05Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/22171Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:14:03.948149Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study Estratégias e Fatores Promotores da Investigação nos Cuidados Primários em Portugal: Um Estudo Transversal |
title |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study |
spellingShingle |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study Morgado, Maria Beatriz Primary Health Care Research Research Design Cuidados de Saúde Primários Investigação Projetos de Investigação |
title_short |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort |
Strategies and Factors to Promote Research in Primary Care in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study |
author |
Morgado, Maria Beatriz |
author_facet |
Morgado, Maria Beatriz Penedo, Carolina Correia, Rubina Amaral, Sandra Diniz Nicola, Paulo Jorge Gil Conde, Margarida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Penedo, Carolina Correia, Rubina Amaral, Sandra Diniz Nicola, Paulo Jorge Gil Conde, Margarida |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morgado, Maria Beatriz Penedo, Carolina Correia, Rubina Amaral, Sandra Diniz Nicola, Paulo Jorge Gil Conde, Margarida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Primary Health Care Research Research Design Cuidados de Saúde Primários Investigação Projetos de Investigação |
topic |
Primary Health Care Research Research Design Cuidados de Saúde Primários Investigação Projetos de Investigação |
description |
Introduction: Research is crucial for building an efficient health system care. This reality is particularly evident in primary care, the cornerstone of healthcare services. However, research in primary care is not consistently implemented across Europe. With this study we aimed to: 1) identify the factors and strategies that healthcare professionals consider relevant for promoting research in primary care in Portugal; 2) analyze whether the prioritized strategies vary according to the geographical area, professional group, workplace, interest, and experience in research of the participants.Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study using an online survey applied in the first semester of 2023. We designed the survey based on strategies identified in a previous qualitative study. We included health professionals working in Primary Care in Portugal (continental and autonomous regions). We intended to obtain at least 200 answers for each professional category and geographical area. The survey was initially sent to a convenience sample to assess the acceptability and interpretation of the questions. We then disseminated the survey through all national Health Center Clusters and through professional associations. We conducted an analysis using a 5% significance level.Results: The sample consisted of 1027 participants: 507 doctors, 377 nurses, 106 diagnostic and therapeutic technicians, and 30 secretaries. The majority worked in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley region (51.9%), followed by the North (22.1%) and Centre (17.1%). Around half of the participants worked in a Family Health Unit, 16.5% worked in a Personalized Healthcare Unit, 11% in a Community Care Unit, and 8.7% in a Public Health Unit. The factors promoting research mentioned by a greater proportion of participants were research training (76%), access to mentors (71%) and grants (56%). As for strategies to promote research, most participants supported the existence of dedicated time for research (82%), public grants (65%), institutional support (51%), access to support services (58%) and research data (57%).Conclusion: There seems to be a consensus on which factors are currently promoting research and what future strategies might be useful for promoting research in primary care in Portugal. Nevertheless, there are some differences between certain sub-groups. This information might be useful to tailor initiatives directed at specific sub-groups. Our intention is to help form policies and strategies to promote research in primary care in Portugal, contributing to the national development on the subject. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-03-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171/15614 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171/15609 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/22171/15610 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2025): March; 137-147 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 38 N.º 3 (2025): Março; 137-147 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833600884199653376 |