Life cycle assessment of butanol production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brito, Marta
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Martins, Florinda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13538
Resumo: The goal of this work was to analyse and compare the environmental impacts of three production methods of butanol. The first one is based on the oxo synthesis and the others use ABE (acetone, butanol and ethanol) fermentation. A life cycle assessment for all alternatives under study was carried out. The ABE fermentation using corn as substrate presents the highest environmental impact and the ABE fermentation using wheat straw is the one that presents the lowest environmental impact, when the allocation method was based on mass. Considering an economic allocation method, the relative weight of butanol raised which increased considerably the environmental impact value in ABE processes due to the lower economic value of gases. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the production of butanol from the two ABE processes varying the data of lower quality to analyse how this would affect the environmental impacts. In the ABE process with wheat straw the variations performed within the scope of the sensibility analysis had no meaningful effect in the global impact (<4.0%) except when the production of gases was varied. In this case the reduction of 50% in the mass of gases produced could result in an increase of roughly 40% in the global impact. For the ABE process with the corn the variation of wastewater produced resulted in a decrease of global environmental impact lower than 1%.
id RCAP_bfbacccabda65deb2cfea7d84ddb11b1
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13538
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Life cycle assessment of butanol productionABEButanolLCABiofuelsSustainabilityThe goal of this work was to analyse and compare the environmental impacts of three production methods of butanol. The first one is based on the oxo synthesis and the others use ABE (acetone, butanol and ethanol) fermentation. A life cycle assessment for all alternatives under study was carried out. The ABE fermentation using corn as substrate presents the highest environmental impact and the ABE fermentation using wheat straw is the one that presents the lowest environmental impact, when the allocation method was based on mass. Considering an economic allocation method, the relative weight of butanol raised which increased considerably the environmental impact value in ABE processes due to the lower economic value of gases. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the production of butanol from the two ABE processes varying the data of lower quality to analyse how this would affect the environmental impacts. In the ABE process with wheat straw the variations performed within the scope of the sensibility analysis had no meaningful effect in the global impact (<4.0%) except when the production of gases was varied. In this case the reduction of 50% in the mass of gases produced could result in an increase of roughly 40% in the global impact. For the ABE process with the corn the variation of wastewater produced resulted in a decrease of global environmental impact lower than 1%.ElsevierREPOSITÓRIO P.PORTOBrito, MartaMartins, Florinda2019-04-12T13:09:47Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13538eng0016-236110.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.050info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-04-02T03:05:47Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13538Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:40:44.031146Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Life cycle assessment of butanol production
title Life cycle assessment of butanol production
spellingShingle Life cycle assessment of butanol production
Brito, Marta
ABE
Butanol
LCA
Biofuels
Sustainability
title_short Life cycle assessment of butanol production
title_full Life cycle assessment of butanol production
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment of butanol production
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment of butanol production
title_sort Life cycle assessment of butanol production
author Brito, Marta
author_facet Brito, Marta
Martins, Florinda
author_role author
author2 Martins, Florinda
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTO
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brito, Marta
Martins, Florinda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ABE
Butanol
LCA
Biofuels
Sustainability
topic ABE
Butanol
LCA
Biofuels
Sustainability
description The goal of this work was to analyse and compare the environmental impacts of three production methods of butanol. The first one is based on the oxo synthesis and the others use ABE (acetone, butanol and ethanol) fermentation. A life cycle assessment for all alternatives under study was carried out. The ABE fermentation using corn as substrate presents the highest environmental impact and the ABE fermentation using wheat straw is the one that presents the lowest environmental impact, when the allocation method was based on mass. Considering an economic allocation method, the relative weight of butanol raised which increased considerably the environmental impact value in ABE processes due to the lower economic value of gases. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the production of butanol from the two ABE processes varying the data of lower quality to analyse how this would affect the environmental impacts. In the ABE process with wheat straw the variations performed within the scope of the sensibility analysis had no meaningful effect in the global impact (<4.0%) except when the production of gases was varied. In this case the reduction of 50% in the mass of gases produced could result in an increase of roughly 40% in the global impact. For the ABE process with the corn the variation of wastewater produced resulted in a decrease of global environmental impact lower than 1%.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-04-12T13:09:47Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13538
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13538
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0016-2361
10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.050
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600646743326720