What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793 |
Summary: | We built upon a recent study by Rodrigues et al. (2018) by investigating potential mechanisms driving the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous (CNM) partners. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we asked 202 Portuguese individuals (158 women; Mage = 29.17, SD = 9.97) to read the description of two partners in either a monogamous, open, or polyamorous relationship, and to make a series of judgments about both partners. Results showed the expected dehumanization effect, such that both groups of CNM partners (open and polyamorous) were attributed more primary (vs. secondary) emotions, whereas the reverse was true for monogamous partners. Moreover, results showed that the dehumanization effect was driven by the perception of CNM partners as less moral and less committed to their relationship. However, these findings were observed only for individuals with unfavorable (vs. favorable) attitudes toward CNM relationship. Overall, this study replicated the original findings and extended our understanding of why people in CNM relationships are stigmatized. |
id |
RCAP_be90ace2e5f5ce50387f1af17d0cfe8f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22793 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?DehumanizationConsensual non-monogamy (CNM)MoralityCommitmentStigmatizationWe built upon a recent study by Rodrigues et al. (2018) by investigating potential mechanisms driving the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous (CNM) partners. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we asked 202 Portuguese individuals (158 women; Mage = 29.17, SD = 9.97) to read the description of two partners in either a monogamous, open, or polyamorous relationship, and to make a series of judgments about both partners. Results showed the expected dehumanization effect, such that both groups of CNM partners (open and polyamorous) were attributed more primary (vs. secondary) emotions, whereas the reverse was true for monogamous partners. Moreover, results showed that the dehumanization effect was driven by the perception of CNM partners as less moral and less committed to their relationship. However, these findings were observed only for individuals with unfavorable (vs. favorable) attitudes toward CNM relationship. Overall, this study replicated the original findings and extended our understanding of why people in CNM relationships are stigmatized.Springer2021-06-22T13:12:45Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-06-22T14:02:47Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793eng0004-000210.1007/s10508-020-01895-5Rodrigues, D. L.Lopes, D.Huic, A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:51:05Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22793Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:32:53.510114Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
title |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
spellingShingle |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? Rodrigues, D. L. Dehumanization Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) Morality Commitment Stigmatization |
title_short |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
title_full |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
title_fullStr |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
title_sort |
What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? |
author |
Rodrigues, D. L. |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, D. L. Lopes, D. Huic, A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes, D. Huic, A. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, D. L. Lopes, D. Huic, A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dehumanization Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) Morality Commitment Stigmatization |
topic |
Dehumanization Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) Morality Commitment Stigmatization |
description |
We built upon a recent study by Rodrigues et al. (2018) by investigating potential mechanisms driving the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous (CNM) partners. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we asked 202 Portuguese individuals (158 women; Mage = 29.17, SD = 9.97) to read the description of two partners in either a monogamous, open, or polyamorous relationship, and to make a series of judgments about both partners. Results showed the expected dehumanization effect, such that both groups of CNM partners (open and polyamorous) were attributed more primary (vs. secondary) emotions, whereas the reverse was true for monogamous partners. Moreover, results showed that the dehumanization effect was driven by the perception of CNM partners as less moral and less committed to their relationship. However, these findings were observed only for individuals with unfavorable (vs. favorable) attitudes toward CNM relationship. Overall, this study replicated the original findings and extended our understanding of why people in CNM relationships are stigmatized. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-22T13:12:45Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021 2021-06-22T14:02:47Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0004-0002 10.1007/s10508-020-01895-5 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597498398081024 |