Principlism in the daily practice of family medicine

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Ana Catarina Fortunato
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Caniço, Hernâni Pombas, Lopes, Susana Rosa, Silvestre, Margarida
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v37i3.12693
• topic: Bioethics; Principlism; Beneficence; Physician-patient relationship; General practice; Bioethics; Principlism; Beneficence; Physician Patient Relationship; General Practice

Introduction: Principlism, from Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, is the most widely accepted theory in biomedical ethics. It is based on four principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. These are part of a common moral serving general action guides to any clinician, including the family doctor. The main purposes of this review are to describe how Principlism can be applied to daily general practice and reflect on how bioethics’ principles can improve the physician-patient relationship.Methods: We developed an integrative literature review, including conventions, declarations, treaties, textbooks, and scientific research articles. Three medical databases were selected to search through the medical literature with specific inclusion criteria. From a total of 2,352 potential articles, 161 were read and 21 were included in this review. The results were grouped into four categories: family medicine and the physician-patient relationship; respect for autonomy; non-maleficence and beneficence; and justice.Results: Family doctors play their professional role by promoting health, preventing disease, and providing cure, care, or palliation. This area may be faced with ethical dilemmas including the moment of obtaining informed consent, medical confidentiality, disease prevention, and the choice of complementary diagnostic tests and therapeutics. All these moral dilemmas arise in the context of a single interpersonal relationship, which is possibly the most therapeutic aspect of medical consultation.Conclusions: Despite all the technological innovation, moral conduct, and principles governing the profession of family doctors remains faithful to the principles of the FM specialty. In a context of a dehumanization threat and global discontent, it is essential to foster a growing humanization of primary health care and recover ethical values, to achieve an optimization of the physician-patient relationship, to deepen the level of understanding of "patient's needs and values" and finally to meet their expectations.