Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360 |
Summary: | Introduction: The nasal septum perforation results from interruption of bilateral septal mucoperichondrium, with subsequent necrosis and destruction of the underlying cartilage. There are several possible causes, but it is most often iatrogenic (due to septoplasty). Although it is often assymptomatic, it can cause significant symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal crusting, bleeding and whistle. Its surgical repair, as an alternative to the septal button, requires a lot of experience and technique, with several methods described in the literature. In our department we use bridge flaps, preferably bilaterally, in order to ensure the closing of the perfuration.Material and Methods: We describe 3 cases operated in the service, using the same technique. First, a perforation with 3 mm of diameter caused by septoplasty; second, a perforation with 5 mm of diameter, caused after FESS for epistaxis control; the third, of unknown cause, with a perforation with 11 mm of diameter.Results: We achieved complete closure in the 2 patients with the smaller perforations. The third patient has a small residual perforation, at 4 months postoperatively. There was resolution of the symptoms in all patients.Conclusions: The septal perforation is responsible for important symptoms and its closure is a desirable option against the placing of a septal button. There are several techniques. In this study we describe the use of bipedicle flaps with good results. |
id |
RCAP_bd7ba50073140568070bccd5449b3e09 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journalsporl.com:article/2991 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases reportTécnica de reparação de perfuração septal com retalhos bipediculados: A propósito de 3 casosseptalperforationbrigeflapsperfuraçãoseptalretalhosbipediculadosIntroduction: The nasal septum perforation results from interruption of bilateral septal mucoperichondrium, with subsequent necrosis and destruction of the underlying cartilage. There are several possible causes, but it is most often iatrogenic (due to septoplasty). Although it is often assymptomatic, it can cause significant symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal crusting, bleeding and whistle. Its surgical repair, as an alternative to the septal button, requires a lot of experience and technique, with several methods described in the literature. In our department we use bridge flaps, preferably bilaterally, in order to ensure the closing of the perfuration.Material and Methods: We describe 3 cases operated in the service, using the same technique. First, a perforation with 3 mm of diameter caused by septoplasty; second, a perforation with 5 mm of diameter, caused after FESS for epistaxis control; the third, of unknown cause, with a perforation with 11 mm of diameter.Results: We achieved complete closure in the 2 patients with the smaller perforations. The third patient has a small residual perforation, at 4 months postoperatively. There was resolution of the symptoms in all patients.Conclusions: The septal perforation is responsible for important symptoms and its closure is a desirable option against the placing of a septal button. There are several techniques. In this study we describe the use of bipedicle flaps with good results.Introdução: A perfuração do septo nasal resulta da interrupção bilateral do mucopericôndrio septal, com subsequente necrose e destruição da cartilagem subjacente. Pode ter várias causas mas mais frequentemente é iatrogénica (por septoplastia). Apesar de ser muitas vezes desconhecida do próprio paciente, causa sintomas importantes como obstrução nasal, crostas, epistaxis e assobio. A sua reparação cirúrgica, como alternativa ao botão septal, requer experiência e muita técnica, estando vários métodos descritos na literatura. No serviço de ORL do Hospital Prof Dr Fernando Fonseca utilizou-se a confecção de retalhos bipediculados que, por deslizamento, encerram a perfuração, uni ou, preferencialmente, bilateralmente.Material e Métodos: Descrevem-se os 3 casos operados no serviço, recorrendo à mesma técnica. O primeiro, uma perfuração de 3 mm de diâmetro antero-posterior, causada por septoplastia; o segundo, uma perfuração de 5 mm de diâmetro, causada após CENS para controlo de epistáxis; o terceiro, de causa desconhecida, com uma perfuração de 11 mm de diâmetro.Resultados: Foi conseguido encerramento total nos 2 doentes com menores perfurações. O terceiro doente apresenta perfuração residual punctiforme aos 4 meses de pós-operatório. Houve resolução do quadro sintomático em todos os doentes.Conclusões: A perfuração septal é causa de sintomas importantes e o seu encerramento constitui uma opção desejável face à colocação de botão septal. Existem diversas técnicas. Neste estudo descreve-se a técnica do retalho bipediculado, com obtenção de bons resultados.Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço2017-12-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 55 No. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 Núm. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 N.º 1 (2017): Março; 21-262184-6499reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991/1012Decq Mota, SofiaMoura, Ivo MiguelGuimarães, AnaAdónis, CristinaFreire, Filipeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T13:01:07Zoai:journalsporl.com:article/2991Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:54:35.792062Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report Técnica de reparação de perfuração septal com retalhos bipediculados: A propósito de 3 casos |
title |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report |
spellingShingle |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report Decq Mota, Sofia septal perforation brige flaps perfuração septal retalhos bipediculados |
title_short |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report |
title_full |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report |
title_fullStr |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report |
title_full_unstemmed |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report |
title_sort |
Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report |
author |
Decq Mota, Sofia |
author_facet |
Decq Mota, Sofia Moura, Ivo Miguel Guimarães, Ana Adónis, Cristina Freire, Filipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moura, Ivo Miguel Guimarães, Ana Adónis, Cristina Freire, Filipe |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Decq Mota, Sofia Moura, Ivo Miguel Guimarães, Ana Adónis, Cristina Freire, Filipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
septal perforation brige flaps perfuração septal retalhos bipediculados |
topic |
septal perforation brige flaps perfuração septal retalhos bipediculados |
description |
Introduction: The nasal septum perforation results from interruption of bilateral septal mucoperichondrium, with subsequent necrosis and destruction of the underlying cartilage. There are several possible causes, but it is most often iatrogenic (due to septoplasty). Although it is often assymptomatic, it can cause significant symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal crusting, bleeding and whistle. Its surgical repair, as an alternative to the septal button, requires a lot of experience and technique, with several methods described in the literature. In our department we use bridge flaps, preferably bilaterally, in order to ensure the closing of the perfuration.Material and Methods: We describe 3 cases operated in the service, using the same technique. First, a perforation with 3 mm of diameter caused by septoplasty; second, a perforation with 5 mm of diameter, caused after FESS for epistaxis control; the third, of unknown cause, with a perforation with 11 mm of diameter.Results: We achieved complete closure in the 2 patients with the smaller perforations. The third patient has a small residual perforation, at 4 months postoperatively. There was resolution of the symptoms in all patients.Conclusions: The septal perforation is responsible for important symptoms and its closure is a desirable option against the placing of a septal button. There are several techniques. In this study we describe the use of bipedicle flaps with good results. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-24 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360 https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991 https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991/1012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 55 No. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26 Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 Núm. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26 Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 N.º 1 (2017): Março; 21-26 2184-6499 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597048962678784 |