Export Ready — 

Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Decq Mota, Sofia
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Moura, Ivo Miguel, Guimarães, Ana, Adónis, Cristina, Freire, Filipe
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360
Summary: Introduction: The nasal septum perforation results from interruption of bilateral septal mucoperichondrium, with subsequent necrosis and destruction of the underlying cartilage. There are several possible causes, but it is most often iatrogenic (due to septoplasty). Although it is often assymptomatic, it can cause significant symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal crusting, bleeding and whistle. Its surgical repair, as an alternative to the septal button, requires a lot of experience and technique, with several methods described in the literature. In our department we use bridge flaps, preferably bilaterally, in order to ensure the closing of the perfuration.Material and Methods: We describe 3 cases operated in the service, using the same technique. First, a perforation with 3 mm of diameter caused by septoplasty; second, a perforation with 5 mm of diameter, caused after FESS for epistaxis control; the third, of unknown cause, with a perforation with 11 mm of diameter.Results: We achieved complete closure in the 2 patients with the smaller perforations. The third patient has a small residual perforation, at 4 months postoperatively. There was resolution of the symptoms in all patients.Conclusions: The septal perforation is responsible for important symptoms and its closure is a desirable option against the placing of a septal button. There are several techniques. In this study we describe the use of bipedicle flaps with good results.
id RCAP_bd7ba50073140568070bccd5449b3e09
oai_identifier_str oai:journalsporl.com:article/2991
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases reportTécnica de reparação de perfuração septal com retalhos bipediculados: A propósito de 3 casosseptalperforationbrigeflapsperfuraçãoseptalretalhosbipediculadosIntroduction: The nasal septum perforation results from interruption of bilateral septal mucoperichondrium, with subsequent necrosis and destruction of the underlying cartilage. There are several possible causes, but it is most often iatrogenic (due to septoplasty). Although it is often assymptomatic, it can cause significant symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal crusting, bleeding and whistle. Its surgical repair, as an alternative to the septal button, requires a lot of experience and technique, with several methods described in the literature. In our department we use bridge flaps, preferably bilaterally, in order to ensure the closing of the perfuration.Material and Methods: We describe 3 cases operated in the service, using the same technique. First, a perforation with 3 mm of diameter caused by septoplasty; second, a perforation with 5 mm of diameter, caused after FESS for epistaxis control; the third, of unknown cause, with a perforation with 11 mm of diameter.Results: We achieved complete closure in the 2 patients with the smaller perforations. The third patient has a small residual perforation, at 4 months postoperatively. There was resolution of the symptoms in all patients.Conclusions: The septal perforation is responsible for important symptoms and its closure is a desirable option against the placing of a septal button. There are several techniques. In this study we describe the use of bipedicle flaps with good results.Introdução: A perfuração do septo nasal resulta da interrupção bilateral do mucopericôndrio septal, com subsequente necrose e destruição da cartilagem subjacente. Pode ter várias causas mas mais frequentemente é iatrogénica (por septoplastia). Apesar de ser muitas vezes desconhecida do próprio paciente, causa sintomas importantes como obstrução nasal, crostas, epistaxis e assobio. A sua reparação cirúrgica, como alternativa ao botão septal, requer experiência e muita técnica, estando vários métodos descritos na literatura. No serviço de ORL do Hospital Prof Dr Fernando Fonseca utilizou-se a confecção de retalhos bipediculados que, por deslizamento, encerram a perfuração, uni ou, preferencialmente, bilateralmente.Material e Métodos: Descrevem-se os 3 casos operados no serviço, recorrendo à mesma técnica. O primeiro, uma perfuração de 3 mm de diâmetro antero-posterior, causada por septoplastia; o segundo, uma perfuração de 5 mm de diâmetro, causada após CENS para controlo de epistáxis; o terceiro, de causa desconhecida, com uma perfuração de 11 mm de diâmetro.Resultados: Foi conseguido encerramento total nos 2 doentes com menores perfurações. O terceiro doente apresenta perfuração residual punctiforme aos 4 meses de pós-operatório. Houve resolução do quadro sintomático em todos os doentes.Conclusões: A perfuração septal é causa de sintomas importantes e o seu encerramento constitui uma opção desejável face à colocação de botão septal. Existem diversas técnicas. Neste estudo descreve-se a técnica do retalho bipediculado, com obtenção de bons resultados.Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço2017-12-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 55 No. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 Núm. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 N.º 1 (2017): Março; 21-262184-6499reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991/1012Decq Mota, SofiaMoura, Ivo MiguelGuimarães, AnaAdónis, CristinaFreire, Filipeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T13:01:07Zoai:journalsporl.com:article/2991Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:54:35.792062Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
Técnica de reparação de perfuração septal com retalhos bipediculados: A propósito de 3 casos
title Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
spellingShingle Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
Decq Mota, Sofia
septal
perforation
brige
flaps
perfuração
septal
retalhos
bipediculados
title_short Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
title_full Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
title_fullStr Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
title_full_unstemmed Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
title_sort Septal perforation repair technique with bipedicle flaps: 3 cases report
author Decq Mota, Sofia
author_facet Decq Mota, Sofia
Moura, Ivo Miguel
Guimarães, Ana
Adónis, Cristina
Freire, Filipe
author_role author
author2 Moura, Ivo Miguel
Guimarães, Ana
Adónis, Cristina
Freire, Filipe
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Decq Mota, Sofia
Moura, Ivo Miguel
Guimarães, Ana
Adónis, Cristina
Freire, Filipe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv septal
perforation
brige
flaps
perfuração
septal
retalhos
bipediculados
topic septal
perforation
brige
flaps
perfuração
septal
retalhos
bipediculados
description Introduction: The nasal septum perforation results from interruption of bilateral septal mucoperichondrium, with subsequent necrosis and destruction of the underlying cartilage. There are several possible causes, but it is most often iatrogenic (due to septoplasty). Although it is often assymptomatic, it can cause significant symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal crusting, bleeding and whistle. Its surgical repair, as an alternative to the septal button, requires a lot of experience and technique, with several methods described in the literature. In our department we use bridge flaps, preferably bilaterally, in order to ensure the closing of the perfuration.Material and Methods: We describe 3 cases operated in the service, using the same technique. First, a perforation with 3 mm of diameter caused by septoplasty; second, a perforation with 5 mm of diameter, caused after FESS for epistaxis control; the third, of unknown cause, with a perforation with 11 mm of diameter.Results: We achieved complete closure in the 2 patients with the smaller perforations. The third patient has a small residual perforation, at 4 months postoperatively. There was resolution of the symptoms in all patients.Conclusions: The septal perforation is responsible for important symptoms and its closure is a desirable option against the placing of a septal button. There are several techniques. In this study we describe the use of bipedicle flaps with good results.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-24
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360
url https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.360
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991
https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2991/1012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 55 No. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26
Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 Núm. 1 (2017): Março; 21-26
Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 55 N.º 1 (2017): Março; 21-26
2184-6499
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597048962678784