A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/13273 |
Summary: | The current research provides a review of the literature while contributing to the academic understanding of agility concepts and their backgrounds. The study identified 73 peerreviewed articles on a systematic review process, based on a three-phase purification process. Data reduction processes use combinations, sentence strings, and keyword updates, title, abstract, and conclusion used in the search. The papers identified focused on agility subdomains business, organizational, strategic, and operational agility. The acknowledged gaps in understanding and developing the art and sub-domains have been identified and categorized according to the conceptual, contextual, and practical areas. Apart from that, the findings show that there is a need to develop separate scales for agility sub-domains to achieve, to get better results without having their scale researcher struggle to get the desired results using a simple agility scale. The paper concludes by highlighting the implications for managers, researchers and suggests a number of future research areas. |
id |
RCAP_b9f5ea00de2a68b40901e592e4e65aaa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipl.pt:10400.21/13273 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument?AgilityBusiness agilityStrategic agilityOrganizational agilityOperational agilityThe current research provides a review of the literature while contributing to the academic understanding of agility concepts and their backgrounds. The study identified 73 peerreviewed articles on a systematic review process, based on a three-phase purification process. Data reduction processes use combinations, sentence strings, and keyword updates, title, abstract, and conclusion used in the search. The papers identified focused on agility subdomains business, organizational, strategic, and operational agility. The acknowledged gaps in understanding and developing the art and sub-domains have been identified and categorized according to the conceptual, contextual, and practical areas. Apart from that, the findings show that there is a need to develop separate scales for agility sub-domains to achieve, to get better results without having their scale researcher struggle to get the desired results using a simple agility scale. The paper concludes by highlighting the implications for managers, researchers and suggests a number of future research areas.Allied AcademiesRCIPLHaider, Syed ArslanMartins, José MoleiroKhan, SohaMata, Mário NunoTehseen, ShehnazAbreu, António2021-05-04T09:37:48Z2021-042021-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/13273eng1099-9264info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-12T10:32:13Zoai:repositorio.ipl.pt:10400.21/13273Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T20:06:54.941160Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
title |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
spellingShingle |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? Haider, Syed Arslan Agility Business agility Strategic agility Organizational agility Operational agility |
title_short |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
title_full |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
title_fullStr |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
title_full_unstemmed |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
title_sort |
A literature review on agility: is there a need to develop a new instrument? |
author |
Haider, Syed Arslan |
author_facet |
Haider, Syed Arslan Martins, José Moleiro Khan, Soha Mata, Mário Nuno Tehseen, Shehnaz Abreu, António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, José Moleiro Khan, Soha Mata, Mário Nuno Tehseen, Shehnaz Abreu, António |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
RCIPL |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Haider, Syed Arslan Martins, José Moleiro Khan, Soha Mata, Mário Nuno Tehseen, Shehnaz Abreu, António |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agility Business agility Strategic agility Organizational agility Operational agility |
topic |
Agility Business agility Strategic agility Organizational agility Operational agility |
description |
The current research provides a review of the literature while contributing to the academic understanding of agility concepts and their backgrounds. The study identified 73 peerreviewed articles on a systematic review process, based on a three-phase purification process. Data reduction processes use combinations, sentence strings, and keyword updates, title, abstract, and conclusion used in the search. The papers identified focused on agility subdomains business, organizational, strategic, and operational agility. The acknowledged gaps in understanding and developing the art and sub-domains have been identified and categorized according to the conceptual, contextual, and practical areas. Apart from that, the findings show that there is a need to develop separate scales for agility sub-domains to achieve, to get better results without having their scale researcher struggle to get the desired results using a simple agility scale. The paper concludes by highlighting the implications for managers, researchers and suggests a number of future research areas. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-04T09:37:48Z 2021-04 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/13273 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/13273 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1099-9264 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Allied Academies |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Allied Academies |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833598498237317120 |