Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10198/23473 |
Summary: | Isometric strength training (IST) with rapid non-sustained contraction (RIST) is effective in improving the ability to generate force rapidly. However, the neuromuscular adaptation of IST with sustained contraction (SIST) and RIST is not known. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare the neuromuscular adaptations of RIST with SIST. Methods Thirty-three national floorball players (23.9 ± 3.1 years old; 1.69 ± 0.08 m; 64.6 ± 11.1 kg) were recruited for this study. Pre- and post-test included countermovement jump (CMJ), 30-m sprint (TT30), isometric squat at 90° (ISqT90) and 120° (ISqT120) knee angles. They were randomly assigned to either control (Con) (n = 9), RIST (n = 12) or SIST (n = 12) group and performed 12 sessions of intervention training. All groups performed the same sets of exercises, but RIST and SIST had to perform ISqT with and without sustained contraction, respectively. Results Time × group effect for CMJ height (P = 0.01, ƞp 2 = 0.25), peak force (PF) (P = 0.03, ƞp 2 = 0.22) and rate of force development (RFD) (P = 0.02, ƞp 2 = 0.22) obtained from ISqT120 were noted. A main effect for time was observed in CMJ height, PF obtained from ISqT90 and ISqT120, and RFD obtained from ISqT90 (P < 0.01, 0.27 < ƞp 2 < 0.57). There was greater improvement in TT30 (P = 0.043, d = 3.00), ISqT90 PF (P = 0.034, d = 3.12), ISqT120 PF (P = 0.003, d = 4.54) and ISqT120 RFD (P = 0.033, d = 1.36) in the SIST than the Con group. Conclusion SIST was more effective in improving strength and dynamic performance as compared to RIST, making it a viable training method to enhance dynamic performances. |
id |
RCAP_b97b06967c50ad474d8814e2d5d9b56e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/23473 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trialCountermovement jumpIsometric squatRate of force developmentPeak forceIsometric strength training (IST) with rapid non-sustained contraction (RIST) is effective in improving the ability to generate force rapidly. However, the neuromuscular adaptation of IST with sustained contraction (SIST) and RIST is not known. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare the neuromuscular adaptations of RIST with SIST. Methods Thirty-three national floorball players (23.9 ± 3.1 years old; 1.69 ± 0.08 m; 64.6 ± 11.1 kg) were recruited for this study. Pre- and post-test included countermovement jump (CMJ), 30-m sprint (TT30), isometric squat at 90° (ISqT90) and 120° (ISqT120) knee angles. They were randomly assigned to either control (Con) (n = 9), RIST (n = 12) or SIST (n = 12) group and performed 12 sessions of intervention training. All groups performed the same sets of exercises, but RIST and SIST had to perform ISqT with and without sustained contraction, respectively. Results Time × group effect for CMJ height (P = 0.01, ƞp 2 = 0.25), peak force (PF) (P = 0.03, ƞp 2 = 0.22) and rate of force development (RFD) (P = 0.02, ƞp 2 = 0.22) obtained from ISqT120 were noted. A main effect for time was observed in CMJ height, PF obtained from ISqT90 and ISqT120, and RFD obtained from ISqT90 (P < 0.01, 0.27 < ƞp 2 < 0.57). There was greater improvement in TT30 (P = 0.043, d = 3.00), ISqT90 PF (P = 0.034, d = 3.12), ISqT120 PF (P = 0.003, d = 4.54) and ISqT120 RFD (P = 0.033, d = 1.36) in the SIST than the Con group. Conclusion SIST was more effective in improving strength and dynamic performance as compared to RIST, making it a viable training method to enhance dynamic performances.SpringerBiblioteca Digital do IPBLum, DannyBarbosa, Tiago M.Joseph, RanaldBalasekaran, Govindasamy2021-03-16T10:46:15Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/23473engLum, Danny; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Joseph, Ranald; Balasekaran, Govindasamy (2021). Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise. ISSN 2096-6709. 5:1, p. 1-102096-670910.1007/s42978-020-00095-winfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-25T12:13:51Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/23473Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T11:41:02.135795Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
title |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
spellingShingle |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial Lum, Danny Countermovement jump Isometric squat Rate of force development Peak force |
title_short |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial |
author |
Lum, Danny |
author_facet |
Lum, Danny Barbosa, Tiago M. Joseph, Ranald Balasekaran, Govindasamy |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa, Tiago M. Joseph, Ranald Balasekaran, Govindasamy |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital do IPB |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lum, Danny Barbosa, Tiago M. Joseph, Ranald Balasekaran, Govindasamy |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Countermovement jump Isometric squat Rate of force development Peak force |
topic |
Countermovement jump Isometric squat Rate of force development Peak force |
description |
Isometric strength training (IST) with rapid non-sustained contraction (RIST) is effective in improving the ability to generate force rapidly. However, the neuromuscular adaptation of IST with sustained contraction (SIST) and RIST is not known. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare the neuromuscular adaptations of RIST with SIST. Methods Thirty-three national floorball players (23.9 ± 3.1 years old; 1.69 ± 0.08 m; 64.6 ± 11.1 kg) were recruited for this study. Pre- and post-test included countermovement jump (CMJ), 30-m sprint (TT30), isometric squat at 90° (ISqT90) and 120° (ISqT120) knee angles. They were randomly assigned to either control (Con) (n = 9), RIST (n = 12) or SIST (n = 12) group and performed 12 sessions of intervention training. All groups performed the same sets of exercises, but RIST and SIST had to perform ISqT with and without sustained contraction, respectively. Results Time × group effect for CMJ height (P = 0.01, ƞp 2 = 0.25), peak force (PF) (P = 0.03, ƞp 2 = 0.22) and rate of force development (RFD) (P = 0.02, ƞp 2 = 0.22) obtained from ISqT120 were noted. A main effect for time was observed in CMJ height, PF obtained from ISqT90 and ISqT120, and RFD obtained from ISqT90 (P < 0.01, 0.27 < ƞp 2 < 0.57). There was greater improvement in TT30 (P = 0.043, d = 3.00), ISqT90 PF (P = 0.034, d = 3.12), ISqT120 PF (P = 0.003, d = 4.54) and ISqT120 RFD (P = 0.033, d = 1.36) in the SIST than the Con group. Conclusion SIST was more effective in improving strength and dynamic performance as compared to RIST, making it a viable training method to enhance dynamic performances. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-16T10:46:15Z 2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/23473 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/23473 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Lum, Danny; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Joseph, Ranald; Balasekaran, Govindasamy (2021). Effects of two isometric strength training methods on jump and sprint performances: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise. ISSN 2096-6709. 5:1, p. 1-10 2096-6709 10.1007/s42978-020-00095-w |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833592147352223744 |