The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gómez, J.A.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Llewellyn, C., Basch, G., Sutton, P.B., Dyson, J.S., Jones, C.A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x
Resumo: Cover crops (CC) in vineyards and olive groves provide an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for land management. Runoff, sediment and nutrient loss from six sites in France, Spain and Portugal were compared over 3–4 yr. In general, runoff loss was not significantly reduced by the CC alternatives: average annual runoff coefficients ranged from 4.9 to 22.8% in CT compared with 1.9– 25% in the CC alternatives. However, at two sites, reductions in average annual runoff coefficients were greater for CC: 17.2 and 10.4% in CT, 6.1 and 1.9% in CC. Nutrient loss in runoff followed a similar pattern to runoff, as did pesticide loss on the one site; reductions occurred when runoff losses were significantly reduced by CC. The lack of differences at the other sites is thought to be due to a combination of soil conditions at the surface (compaction and capping) and sub-surface (lowpermeability horizons close to the surface). In contrast, CC always resulted in reductions in soil erosion loss, plus similar reductions in nutrients and organic matter (OM) associated with sediment. Soil erosion loss ranged from 1.4 to 90 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CT compared with 0.04–42.7 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CC. Overall, reductions in runoff and associated nutrient and pesticide loss from vineyards and olives occurred with the introduction of CCs only when soil permeability was sufficiently high to reduce runoff. In contrast, reduction in soil erosion and associated nutrients and OM occurred even when the amount of runoff was not reduced. In the most extreme encountered situations (highly erodible soils in vulnerable landscape positions and subject to highly erosive rainfall), additional conservation measures are needed to prevent unsustainable soil loss.
id RCAP_b7dd8b2f485280272fcb30ebde01a06a
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/3003
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countriessoil erosionsoil conservationrunoffnutrient lossolive grovesvineyardsCover crops (CC) in vineyards and olive groves provide an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for land management. Runoff, sediment and nutrient loss from six sites in France, Spain and Portugal were compared over 3–4 yr. In general, runoff loss was not significantly reduced by the CC alternatives: average annual runoff coefficients ranged from 4.9 to 22.8% in CT compared with 1.9– 25% in the CC alternatives. However, at two sites, reductions in average annual runoff coefficients were greater for CC: 17.2 and 10.4% in CT, 6.1 and 1.9% in CC. Nutrient loss in runoff followed a similar pattern to runoff, as did pesticide loss on the one site; reductions occurred when runoff losses were significantly reduced by CC. The lack of differences at the other sites is thought to be due to a combination of soil conditions at the surface (compaction and capping) and sub-surface (lowpermeability horizons close to the surface). In contrast, CC always resulted in reductions in soil erosion loss, plus similar reductions in nutrients and organic matter (OM) associated with sediment. Soil erosion loss ranged from 1.4 to 90 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CT compared with 0.04–42.7 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CC. Overall, reductions in runoff and associated nutrient and pesticide loss from vineyards and olives occurred with the introduction of CCs only when soil permeability was sufficiently high to reduce runoff. In contrast, reduction in soil erosion and associated nutrients and OM occurred even when the amount of runoff was not reduced. In the most extreme encountered situations (highly erodible soils in vulnerable landscape positions and subject to highly erosive rainfall), additional conservation measures are needed to prevent unsustainable soil loss.John Wiley & Sons2012-01-02T16:46:30Z2012-01-022011-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.xengGÓMEZ, J.A.; LLEWELLYN, C.; BASCH, G.; SUTTON, P.B.; DYSON, J.S. & JONES, C.A. (2011): The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries. Soil Use and Management 27(4): 502-514. (doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x).502-5144SoilUse and Management27Deptº de Fitotecniajoseagomez@ias.csic.esndgb@uevora.ptndndnd584Gómez, J.A.Llewellyn, C.Basch, G.Sutton, P.B.Dyson, J.S.Jones, C.A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:39:47Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/3003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T11:52:03.470673Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
title The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
spellingShingle The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
Gómez, J.A.
soil erosion
soil conservation
runoff
nutrient loss
olive groves
vineyards
title_short The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
title_full The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
title_fullStr The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
title_full_unstemmed The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
title_sort The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
author Gómez, J.A.
author_facet Gómez, J.A.
Llewellyn, C.
Basch, G.
Sutton, P.B.
Dyson, J.S.
Jones, C.A.
author_role author
author2 Llewellyn, C.
Basch, G.
Sutton, P.B.
Dyson, J.S.
Jones, C.A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gómez, J.A.
Llewellyn, C.
Basch, G.
Sutton, P.B.
Dyson, J.S.
Jones, C.A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv soil erosion
soil conservation
runoff
nutrient loss
olive groves
vineyards
topic soil erosion
soil conservation
runoff
nutrient loss
olive groves
vineyards
description Cover crops (CC) in vineyards and olive groves provide an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for land management. Runoff, sediment and nutrient loss from six sites in France, Spain and Portugal were compared over 3–4 yr. In general, runoff loss was not significantly reduced by the CC alternatives: average annual runoff coefficients ranged from 4.9 to 22.8% in CT compared with 1.9– 25% in the CC alternatives. However, at two sites, reductions in average annual runoff coefficients were greater for CC: 17.2 and 10.4% in CT, 6.1 and 1.9% in CC. Nutrient loss in runoff followed a similar pattern to runoff, as did pesticide loss on the one site; reductions occurred when runoff losses were significantly reduced by CC. The lack of differences at the other sites is thought to be due to a combination of soil conditions at the surface (compaction and capping) and sub-surface (lowpermeability horizons close to the surface). In contrast, CC always resulted in reductions in soil erosion loss, plus similar reductions in nutrients and organic matter (OM) associated with sediment. Soil erosion loss ranged from 1.4 to 90 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CT compared with 0.04–42.7 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CC. Overall, reductions in runoff and associated nutrient and pesticide loss from vineyards and olives occurred with the introduction of CCs only when soil permeability was sufficiently high to reduce runoff. In contrast, reduction in soil erosion and associated nutrients and OM occurred even when the amount of runoff was not reduced. In the most extreme encountered situations (highly erodible soils in vulnerable landscape positions and subject to highly erosive rainfall), additional conservation measures are needed to prevent unsustainable soil loss.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01T00:00:00Z
2012-01-02T16:46:30Z
2012-01-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv GÓMEZ, J.A.; LLEWELLYN, C.; BASCH, G.; SUTTON, P.B.; DYSON, J.S. & JONES, C.A. (2011): The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries. Soil Use and Management 27(4): 502-514. (doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x).
502-514
4
SoilUse and Management
27
Deptº de Fitotecnia
joseagomez@ias.csic.es
nd
gb@uevora.pt
nd
nd
nd
584
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833592308422934528