The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2011 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x |
Summary: | Cover crops (CC) in vineyards and olive groves provide an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for land management. Runoff, sediment and nutrient loss from six sites in France, Spain and Portugal were compared over 3–4 yr. In general, runoff loss was not significantly reduced by the CC alternatives: average annual runoff coefficients ranged from 4.9 to 22.8% in CT compared with 1.9– 25% in the CC alternatives. However, at two sites, reductions in average annual runoff coefficients were greater for CC: 17.2 and 10.4% in CT, 6.1 and 1.9% in CC. Nutrient loss in runoff followed a similar pattern to runoff, as did pesticide loss on the one site; reductions occurred when runoff losses were significantly reduced by CC. The lack of differences at the other sites is thought to be due to a combination of soil conditions at the surface (compaction and capping) and sub-surface (lowpermeability horizons close to the surface). In contrast, CC always resulted in reductions in soil erosion loss, plus similar reductions in nutrients and organic matter (OM) associated with sediment. Soil erosion loss ranged from 1.4 to 90 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CT compared with 0.04–42.7 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CC. Overall, reductions in runoff and associated nutrient and pesticide loss from vineyards and olives occurred with the introduction of CCs only when soil permeability was sufficiently high to reduce runoff. In contrast, reduction in soil erosion and associated nutrients and OM occurred even when the amount of runoff was not reduced. In the most extreme encountered situations (highly erodible soils in vulnerable landscape positions and subject to highly erosive rainfall), additional conservation measures are needed to prevent unsustainable soil loss. |
id |
RCAP_b7dd8b2f485280272fcb30ebde01a06a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/3003 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countriessoil erosionsoil conservationrunoffnutrient lossolive grovesvineyardsCover crops (CC) in vineyards and olive groves provide an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for land management. Runoff, sediment and nutrient loss from six sites in France, Spain and Portugal were compared over 3–4 yr. In general, runoff loss was not significantly reduced by the CC alternatives: average annual runoff coefficients ranged from 4.9 to 22.8% in CT compared with 1.9– 25% in the CC alternatives. However, at two sites, reductions in average annual runoff coefficients were greater for CC: 17.2 and 10.4% in CT, 6.1 and 1.9% in CC. Nutrient loss in runoff followed a similar pattern to runoff, as did pesticide loss on the one site; reductions occurred when runoff losses were significantly reduced by CC. The lack of differences at the other sites is thought to be due to a combination of soil conditions at the surface (compaction and capping) and sub-surface (lowpermeability horizons close to the surface). In contrast, CC always resulted in reductions in soil erosion loss, plus similar reductions in nutrients and organic matter (OM) associated with sediment. Soil erosion loss ranged from 1.4 to 90 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CT compared with 0.04–42.7 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CC. Overall, reductions in runoff and associated nutrient and pesticide loss from vineyards and olives occurred with the introduction of CCs only when soil permeability was sufficiently high to reduce runoff. In contrast, reduction in soil erosion and associated nutrients and OM occurred even when the amount of runoff was not reduced. In the most extreme encountered situations (highly erodible soils in vulnerable landscape positions and subject to highly erosive rainfall), additional conservation measures are needed to prevent unsustainable soil loss.John Wiley & Sons2012-01-02T16:46:30Z2012-01-022011-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.xengGÓMEZ, J.A.; LLEWELLYN, C.; BASCH, G.; SUTTON, P.B.; DYSON, J.S. & JONES, C.A. (2011): The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries. Soil Use and Management 27(4): 502-514. (doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x).502-5144SoilUse and Management27Deptº de Fitotecniajoseagomez@ias.csic.esndgb@uevora.ptndndnd584Gómez, J.A.Llewellyn, C.Basch, G.Sutton, P.B.Dyson, J.S.Jones, C.A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:39:47Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/3003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T11:52:03.470673Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
title |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
spellingShingle |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries Gómez, J.A. soil erosion soil conservation runoff nutrient loss olive groves vineyards |
title_short |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
title_full |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
title_fullStr |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
title_sort |
The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries |
author |
Gómez, J.A. |
author_facet |
Gómez, J.A. Llewellyn, C. Basch, G. Sutton, P.B. Dyson, J.S. Jones, C.A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Llewellyn, C. Basch, G. Sutton, P.B. Dyson, J.S. Jones, C.A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gómez, J.A. Llewellyn, C. Basch, G. Sutton, P.B. Dyson, J.S. Jones, C.A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
soil erosion soil conservation runoff nutrient loss olive groves vineyards |
topic |
soil erosion soil conservation runoff nutrient loss olive groves vineyards |
description |
Cover crops (CC) in vineyards and olive groves provide an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for land management. Runoff, sediment and nutrient loss from six sites in France, Spain and Portugal were compared over 3–4 yr. In general, runoff loss was not significantly reduced by the CC alternatives: average annual runoff coefficients ranged from 4.9 to 22.8% in CT compared with 1.9– 25% in the CC alternatives. However, at two sites, reductions in average annual runoff coefficients were greater for CC: 17.2 and 10.4% in CT, 6.1 and 1.9% in CC. Nutrient loss in runoff followed a similar pattern to runoff, as did pesticide loss on the one site; reductions occurred when runoff losses were significantly reduced by CC. The lack of differences at the other sites is thought to be due to a combination of soil conditions at the surface (compaction and capping) and sub-surface (lowpermeability horizons close to the surface). In contrast, CC always resulted in reductions in soil erosion loss, plus similar reductions in nutrients and organic matter (OM) associated with sediment. Soil erosion loss ranged from 1.4 to 90 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CT compared with 0.04–42.7 t ⁄ ha ⁄ yr in CC. Overall, reductions in runoff and associated nutrient and pesticide loss from vineyards and olives occurred with the introduction of CCs only when soil permeability was sufficiently high to reduce runoff. In contrast, reduction in soil erosion and associated nutrients and OM occurred even when the amount of runoff was not reduced. In the most extreme encountered situations (highly erodible soils in vulnerable landscape positions and subject to highly erosive rainfall), additional conservation measures are needed to prevent unsustainable soil loss. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-01T00:00:00Z 2012-01-02T16:46:30Z 2012-01-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
GÓMEZ, J.A.; LLEWELLYN, C.; BASCH, G.; SUTTON, P.B.; DYSON, J.S. & JONES, C.A. (2011): The effects of cover crops and conventional tillage on soil and runoff loss in vineyards and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries. Soil Use and Management 27(4): 502-514. (doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00367.x). 502-514 4 SoilUse and Management 27 Deptº de Fitotecnia joseagomez@ias.csic.es nd gb@uevora.pt nd nd nd 584 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833592308422934528 |