Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fischer, Michaela
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Gilardi, Fabrizio
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004
Summary: Are digital technologies leveling the playing field or reinforcing existing power relations and structures? This question lies at the core of the equalization vs. normalization debate. The equalization thesis states that the affordances of digital technologies help less-powerful political actors to compete with their more resource-rich counterparts, thereby overcoming structural disadvantages inherent to the political landscape. The normalization thesis, in contrast, suggests that more powerful and resource-rich political actors outperform their weaker competitors in the digital sphere by establishing a more sophisticated online presence, thus reproducing existing power imbalances. An overwhelming majority of studies on the equalizing vs. normalizing effect of digital technologies focus on electoral campaigns or non-electoral periods. Direct democratic campaigns have not been adequately considered in previous studies. This study exploits the regularly held and institutionalized character of direct democratic votes in Switzerland. Specifically, it investigates political actors’ level of activity and generated engagement on Facebook and in newspapers during all direct democratic campaigns from 2010–2020. Applying the equalization vs. normalization lens to Swiss direct democratic campaigns over an 11-year timespan provides new insights into the status-quo preserving or altering effects of digital technologies. We find a tendency toward equalization in terms of Facebook activity and user engagement, and in a comparative perspective: Facebook campaigns are, on average, more balanced than newspaper advertisement campaigns, particularly since 2014.
id RCAP_ae92a704fed598c0c2a07f3f99d3bf65
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6004
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaignsdigital campaigning; direct democracy; equalization; normalization; SwitzerlandAre digital technologies leveling the playing field or reinforcing existing power relations and structures? This question lies at the core of the equalization vs. normalization debate. The equalization thesis states that the affordances of digital technologies help less-powerful political actors to compete with their more resource-rich counterparts, thereby overcoming structural disadvantages inherent to the political landscape. The normalization thesis, in contrast, suggests that more powerful and resource-rich political actors outperform their weaker competitors in the digital sphere by establishing a more sophisticated online presence, thus reproducing existing power imbalances. An overwhelming majority of studies on the equalizing vs. normalizing effect of digital technologies focus on electoral campaigns or non-electoral periods. Direct democratic campaigns have not been adequately considered in previous studies. This study exploits the regularly held and institutionalized character of direct democratic votes in Switzerland. Specifically, it investigates political actors’ level of activity and generated engagement on Facebook and in newspapers during all direct democratic campaigns from 2010–2020. Applying the equalization vs. normalization lens to Swiss direct democratic campaigns over an 11-year timespan provides new insights into the status-quo preserving or altering effects of digital technologies. We find a tendency toward equalization in terms of Facebook activity and user engagement, and in a comparative perspective: Facebook campaigns are, on average, more balanced than newspaper advertisement campaigns, particularly since 2014.Cogitatio Press2023-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age; 43-552183-2439reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6004https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6004/6004https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/6004/3108Copyright (c) 2023 Michaela Fischer, Fabrizio Gilardiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFischer, MichaelaGilardi, Fabrizio2023-06-29T17:45:22Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6004Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:51:15.036097Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
title Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
spellingShingle Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
Fischer, Michaela
digital campaigning; direct democracy; equalization; normalization; Switzerland
title_short Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
title_full Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
title_fullStr Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
title_full_unstemmed Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
title_sort Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
author Fischer, Michaela
author_facet Fischer, Michaela
Gilardi, Fabrizio
author_role author
author2 Gilardi, Fabrizio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fischer, Michaela
Gilardi, Fabrizio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv digital campaigning; direct democracy; equalization; normalization; Switzerland
topic digital campaigning; direct democracy; equalization; normalization; Switzerland
description Are digital technologies leveling the playing field or reinforcing existing power relations and structures? This question lies at the core of the equalization vs. normalization debate. The equalization thesis states that the affordances of digital technologies help less-powerful political actors to compete with their more resource-rich counterparts, thereby overcoming structural disadvantages inherent to the political landscape. The normalization thesis, in contrast, suggests that more powerful and resource-rich political actors outperform their weaker competitors in the digital sphere by establishing a more sophisticated online presence, thus reproducing existing power imbalances. An overwhelming majority of studies on the equalizing vs. normalizing effect of digital technologies focus on electoral campaigns or non-electoral periods. Direct democratic campaigns have not been adequately considered in previous studies. This study exploits the regularly held and institutionalized character of direct democratic votes in Switzerland. Specifically, it investigates political actors’ level of activity and generated engagement on Facebook and in newspapers during all direct democratic campaigns from 2010–2020. Applying the equalization vs. normalization lens to Swiss direct democratic campaigns over an 11-year timespan provides new insights into the status-quo preserving or altering effects of digital technologies. We find a tendency toward equalization in terms of Facebook activity and user engagement, and in a comparative perspective: Facebook campaigns are, on average, more balanced than newspaper advertisement campaigns, particularly since 2014.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6004
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6004/6004
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/6004/3108
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Michaela Fischer, Fabrizio Gilardi
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Michaela Fischer, Fabrizio Gilardi
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age; 43-55
2183-2439
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833591309944750080