Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Mário Jorge
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Barbosa, Tiago M., Morais, Jorge, Miranda, Sérgio, Marinho, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9252
Resumo: The biomechanical adaptations in front crawl and backstroke swimming, as influenced by the implementation of a concurrent teaching programme were analysed. Sixteen participants (19.75 ± 1.13 years) underwent a 30 weeks intervention characterized by an increasing complexity to accomplish motor skills in the following order: (i) lower limbs propulsion; (ii) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with breathing cycle; (iii) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with one upper limb action; (iv) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with both breathing cycle and one upper limb action; (v) full swimming stroke; (vi) motor trajectory of the arms stroke. Performance and biomechanics were measured at front crawl and backstroke during three time points throughout the programme. There were improvements in performance over time at front crawl (21.49 s to 19.99 s, p<0.01) and backstroke (27.15 s to 24.60 s, p = 0.01). Significant improvements were found for velocity at front crawl (1.13 m/s to 1.22 m/s, p<0.01) and backstroke (0.92 m/s to 1.00 m/s, p<0.01). Stroke frequency increased at backstroke (0.64 to 0.73 Hz, p = 0.01), while the intra-cyclic variation of the velocity decreased at front crawl (0.13 to 0.12%, p = 0.02). There was also a moderate-high inter-subject variability in response to the programme. These findings prove that a programme of 30 weeks teaching concurrently front crawl and backstroke is effective to promote similar biomechanical adaptations in low-tier swimmers. However, each subject shows an individual response to better adapt the biomechanical actions and to reach a higher level of expertise.
id RCAP_ac8e75c9af0f92d9e3472b74e1f77b14
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/9252
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?ArmComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMalePhysical ConditioningPhysical ExertionPsychomotor PerformanceReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory MechanicsSensitivity and SpecificitySwimmingYoung AdultModels - BiologicalThe biomechanical adaptations in front crawl and backstroke swimming, as influenced by the implementation of a concurrent teaching programme were analysed. Sixteen participants (19.75 ± 1.13 years) underwent a 30 weeks intervention characterized by an increasing complexity to accomplish motor skills in the following order: (i) lower limbs propulsion; (ii) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with breathing cycle; (iii) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with one upper limb action; (iv) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with both breathing cycle and one upper limb action; (v) full swimming stroke; (vi) motor trajectory of the arms stroke. Performance and biomechanics were measured at front crawl and backstroke during three time points throughout the programme. There were improvements in performance over time at front crawl (21.49 s to 19.99 s, p<0.01) and backstroke (27.15 s to 24.60 s, p = 0.01). Significant improvements were found for velocity at front crawl (1.13 m/s to 1.22 m/s, p<0.01) and backstroke (0.92 m/s to 1.00 m/s, p<0.01). Stroke frequency increased at backstroke (0.64 to 0.73 Hz, p = 0.01), while the intra-cyclic variation of the velocity decreased at front crawl (0.13 to 0.12%, p = 0.02). There was also a moderate-high inter-subject variability in response to the programme. These findings prove that a programme of 30 weeks teaching concurrently front crawl and backstroke is effective to promote similar biomechanical adaptations in low-tier swimmers. However, each subject shows an individual response to better adapt the biomechanical actions and to reach a higher level of expertise.uBibliorumCosta, Mário JorgeBarbosa, Tiago M.Morais, JorgeMiranda, SérgioMarinho, Daniel2020-02-12T17:09:37Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9252eng10.5277/ABB-00511-2015-03info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-11T15:35:43Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/9252Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:27:31.996139Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
title Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
spellingShingle Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
Costa, Mário Jorge
Arm
Computer Simulation
Female
Humans
Male
Physical Conditioning
Physical Exertion
Psychomotor Performance
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Mechanics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Swimming
Young Adult
Models - Biological
title_short Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
title_full Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
title_fullStr Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
title_full_unstemmed Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
title_sort Can concurrent teaching promote equal biomechanical adaptations at front crawl and backstroke swimming?
author Costa, Mário Jorge
author_facet Costa, Mário Jorge
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Morais, Jorge
Miranda, Sérgio
Marinho, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Barbosa, Tiago M.
Morais, Jorge
Miranda, Sérgio
Marinho, Daniel
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Mário Jorge
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Morais, Jorge
Miranda, Sérgio
Marinho, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arm
Computer Simulation
Female
Humans
Male
Physical Conditioning
Physical Exertion
Psychomotor Performance
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Mechanics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Swimming
Young Adult
Models - Biological
topic Arm
Computer Simulation
Female
Humans
Male
Physical Conditioning
Physical Exertion
Psychomotor Performance
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Mechanics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Swimming
Young Adult
Models - Biological
description The biomechanical adaptations in front crawl and backstroke swimming, as influenced by the implementation of a concurrent teaching programme were analysed. Sixteen participants (19.75 ± 1.13 years) underwent a 30 weeks intervention characterized by an increasing complexity to accomplish motor skills in the following order: (i) lower limbs propulsion; (ii) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with breathing cycle; (iii) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with one upper limb action; (iv) lower limbs propulsion synchronized with both breathing cycle and one upper limb action; (v) full swimming stroke; (vi) motor trajectory of the arms stroke. Performance and biomechanics were measured at front crawl and backstroke during three time points throughout the programme. There were improvements in performance over time at front crawl (21.49 s to 19.99 s, p<0.01) and backstroke (27.15 s to 24.60 s, p = 0.01). Significant improvements were found for velocity at front crawl (1.13 m/s to 1.22 m/s, p<0.01) and backstroke (0.92 m/s to 1.00 m/s, p<0.01). Stroke frequency increased at backstroke (0.64 to 0.73 Hz, p = 0.01), while the intra-cyclic variation of the velocity decreased at front crawl (0.13 to 0.12%, p = 0.02). There was also a moderate-high inter-subject variability in response to the programme. These findings prove that a programme of 30 weeks teaching concurrently front crawl and backstroke is effective to promote similar biomechanical adaptations in low-tier swimmers. However, each subject shows an individual response to better adapt the biomechanical actions and to reach a higher level of expertise.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-02-12T17:09:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9252
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9252
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5277/ABB-00511-2015-03
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600990246338560