Export Ready — 

Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martins, Orlando
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Sahrmann, Philipp, Ramos, João, Caramelo, Francisco, Matos, Sérgio, Baptista, Isabel Poiares
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103380
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010113
Summary: Background and Objectives: Peri-implantitis treatment is still undefined. Regenerative treatment is expensive and technically demanding due to the need to handle biomaterials, membranes and different methodologies of decontamination. Resective treatment and implantoplasty might be a viable solution. This case series presents a 24 month retrospective observational study of 10 peri-implantitis patients treated with implantoplasty. Materials and Methods: In the present case series, 10 peri-implantitis patients (20 implants) were treated with a resective approach and implantoplasty. Previous to implantoplasty, all patients underwent non-surgical treatment. This surgery consisted in a full-thickness flap and implant surface exposure. The exposed non-osseointegrated implant body was submitted to implantoplasty. The flap was apically repositioned and sutured. Patients were accompanied for 24 months. Results: The mean initial probing depth (PD) (PD = 5.37 ± 0.86 mm), bleeding on probing (BoP = 0.12 ± 0.06%) and suppuration (Sup = 0.01 ± 0.01%) decreased significantly at the 12 month evaluation (PD = 2.90 ± 0.39 mm; BoP = 0.01 ± 0.01% and Sup = 0.00 ± 0.00%). Between the 12 and 24 month evaluations, there were no significant clinical changes (PD = 2.85 ± 0.45 mm; BoP = 0.01 ± 0.01% and Sup = 0.00 ± 0.00%). Mucosal recession (MR) had a significant increase between the baseline and the first 12 months (0.69 ± 0.99 mm vs. 1.96 ± 1.33 mm), but there were no significant changes between the 12th and 24th month (1.94 ± 1.48 mm). The success rate was 100% without implant fracture or loss. Conclusions: Resective surgery and implantoplasty might be a valid option in some specific peri-implantitis cases. Properly designed clinical trials are needed to confirm this possibility.
id RCAP_abfa6d52856b1b3e85c095d2fd66c50e
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103380
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Seriesperi-implantitisimplantoplastycase reportsdental implantsHumansPeriodontal IndexResearchSurgical FlapsPeri-ImplantitisBackground and Objectives: Peri-implantitis treatment is still undefined. Regenerative treatment is expensive and technically demanding due to the need to handle biomaterials, membranes and different methodologies of decontamination. Resective treatment and implantoplasty might be a viable solution. This case series presents a 24 month retrospective observational study of 10 peri-implantitis patients treated with implantoplasty. Materials and Methods: In the present case series, 10 peri-implantitis patients (20 implants) were treated with a resective approach and implantoplasty. Previous to implantoplasty, all patients underwent non-surgical treatment. This surgery consisted in a full-thickness flap and implant surface exposure. The exposed non-osseointegrated implant body was submitted to implantoplasty. The flap was apically repositioned and sutured. Patients were accompanied for 24 months. Results: The mean initial probing depth (PD) (PD = 5.37 ± 0.86 mm), bleeding on probing (BoP = 0.12 ± 0.06%) and suppuration (Sup = 0.01 ± 0.01%) decreased significantly at the 12 month evaluation (PD = 2.90 ± 0.39 mm; BoP = 0.01 ± 0.01% and Sup = 0.00 ± 0.00%). Between the 12 and 24 month evaluations, there were no significant clinical changes (PD = 2.85 ± 0.45 mm; BoP = 0.01 ± 0.01% and Sup = 0.00 ± 0.00%). Mucosal recession (MR) had a significant increase between the baseline and the first 12 months (0.69 ± 0.99 mm vs. 1.96 ± 1.33 mm), but there were no significant changes between the 12th and 24th month (1.94 ± 1.48 mm). The success rate was 100% without implant fracture or loss. Conclusions: Resective surgery and implantoplasty might be a valid option in some specific peri-implantitis cases. Properly designed clinical trials are needed to confirm this possibility.2022-01-12info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/103380https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103380https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010113eng1648-9144Martins, OrlandoSahrmann, PhilippRamos, JoãoCaramelo, FranciscoMatos, SérgioBaptista, Isabel Poiaresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2022-11-09T21:33:30Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103380Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:53:18.419091Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
title Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
spellingShingle Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
Martins, Orlando
peri-implantitis
implantoplasty
case reports
dental implants
Humans
Periodontal Index
Research
Surgical Flaps
Peri-Implantitis
title_short Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
title_full Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
title_fullStr Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
title_sort Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series
author Martins, Orlando
author_facet Martins, Orlando
Sahrmann, Philipp
Ramos, João
Caramelo, Francisco
Matos, Sérgio
Baptista, Isabel Poiares
author_role author
author2 Sahrmann, Philipp
Ramos, João
Caramelo, Francisco
Matos, Sérgio
Baptista, Isabel Poiares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Orlando
Sahrmann, Philipp
Ramos, João
Caramelo, Francisco
Matos, Sérgio
Baptista, Isabel Poiares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv peri-implantitis
implantoplasty
case reports
dental implants
Humans
Periodontal Index
Research
Surgical Flaps
Peri-Implantitis
topic peri-implantitis
implantoplasty
case reports
dental implants
Humans
Periodontal Index
Research
Surgical Flaps
Peri-Implantitis
description Background and Objectives: Peri-implantitis treatment is still undefined. Regenerative treatment is expensive and technically demanding due to the need to handle biomaterials, membranes and different methodologies of decontamination. Resective treatment and implantoplasty might be a viable solution. This case series presents a 24 month retrospective observational study of 10 peri-implantitis patients treated with implantoplasty. Materials and Methods: In the present case series, 10 peri-implantitis patients (20 implants) were treated with a resective approach and implantoplasty. Previous to implantoplasty, all patients underwent non-surgical treatment. This surgery consisted in a full-thickness flap and implant surface exposure. The exposed non-osseointegrated implant body was submitted to implantoplasty. The flap was apically repositioned and sutured. Patients were accompanied for 24 months. Results: The mean initial probing depth (PD) (PD = 5.37 ± 0.86 mm), bleeding on probing (BoP = 0.12 ± 0.06%) and suppuration (Sup = 0.01 ± 0.01%) decreased significantly at the 12 month evaluation (PD = 2.90 ± 0.39 mm; BoP = 0.01 ± 0.01% and Sup = 0.00 ± 0.00%). Between the 12 and 24 month evaluations, there were no significant clinical changes (PD = 2.85 ± 0.45 mm; BoP = 0.01 ± 0.01% and Sup = 0.00 ± 0.00%). Mucosal recession (MR) had a significant increase between the baseline and the first 12 months (0.69 ± 0.99 mm vs. 1.96 ± 1.33 mm), but there were no significant changes between the 12th and 24th month (1.94 ± 1.48 mm). The success rate was 100% without implant fracture or loss. Conclusions: Resective surgery and implantoplasty might be a valid option in some specific peri-implantitis cases. Properly designed clinical trials are needed to confirm this possibility.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-12
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103380
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103380
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010113
url https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103380
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010113
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1648-9144
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602506564829184