Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Susana
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Zêzere, José, Bateira, Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37000
Resumo: The aim of this study is to identify the landslide predisposing factors’ combination using a bivariate statistical model that best predicts landslide susceptibility. The best model is one that has simultaneously good performance in terms of suitability and predictive power and has been developed using variables that are conditionally independent. The study area is the Santa Marta de Penaguiao council (70 km ˜ 2 ) located in the Northern Portugal. In order to identify the best combination of landslide predisposing factors, all possible combinations using up to seven predisposing factors were performed, which resulted in 120 predictions that were assessed with a landside inventory containing 767 shallow translational slides. The best landslide susceptibility model was selected according to the model degree of fitness and on the basis of a conditional independence criterion. The best model was developed with only three landslide predisposing factors (slope angle, inverse wetness index, and land use) and was compared with a model developed using all seven landslide predisposing factors. Results showed that it is possible to produce a reliable landslide susceptibility model using fewer landslide predisposing factors, which contributes towards higher conditional independence. 1 Introduction Recent developments in GIS software and increasing computing power allow a substantially high number of independent variables to be used in empirical, data-driven landslide susceptibility models. Recent studies in landslide susceptibility models usually involve over a dozen variables considered as predisposing factors of slope instability (e.g. Lee et al., 2002 (13 variables); Lee and Choi, 2004 (15 variables); van der Eeckhaut et al., 2010 (9 variables); Sterlacchini et al., 2011 (9 variables)). Nevertheless, the evaluation of the weight of each landslide predisposing factor within the predictive model through a thorough sensitivity analysis is frequently missing. In addition, the application of statistic bivariate methods to assess landslide susceptibility assumes conditional independence (CI) of the landslide predisposing factors (Bonham-Carter et al., 1989; Agterberg et al., 1993; Van Westen, 1993; Agterberg and Cheng, 2002; Thiart et al., 2003; Thiery et al., 2007). Blahut et al. (2010) pointed out that spatial probabilities are overestimated when conditional independence is not verified. In this study, the aim is to determine the best combination of landslide predisposing variables using a bivariate statistical model, based on the assessment of goodness of fit and predictive power, using variables that have a high degree of conditional independence. In addition, we assess the number of unique conditions within each landslide susceptibility model associated to each combination of landslide predisposing variables. This number should be minimized when landslide susceptibility maps are made for land use planning and management in order to avoid the over partitioning of the study area.
id RCAP_abac148b0268ac57ca4e6eaf66c8e246
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/37000
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility modelsLandslide predisposing factorsShallow landslide susceptibility modelsThe aim of this study is to identify the landslide predisposing factors’ combination using a bivariate statistical model that best predicts landslide susceptibility. The best model is one that has simultaneously good performance in terms of suitability and predictive power and has been developed using variables that are conditionally independent. The study area is the Santa Marta de Penaguiao council (70 km ˜ 2 ) located in the Northern Portugal. In order to identify the best combination of landslide predisposing factors, all possible combinations using up to seven predisposing factors were performed, which resulted in 120 predictions that were assessed with a landside inventory containing 767 shallow translational slides. The best landslide susceptibility model was selected according to the model degree of fitness and on the basis of a conditional independence criterion. The best model was developed with only three landslide predisposing factors (slope angle, inverse wetness index, and land use) and was compared with a model developed using all seven landslide predisposing factors. Results showed that it is possible to produce a reliable landslide susceptibility model using fewer landslide predisposing factors, which contributes towards higher conditional independence. 1 Introduction Recent developments in GIS software and increasing computing power allow a substantially high number of independent variables to be used in empirical, data-driven landslide susceptibility models. Recent studies in landslide susceptibility models usually involve over a dozen variables considered as predisposing factors of slope instability (e.g. Lee et al., 2002 (13 variables); Lee and Choi, 2004 (15 variables); van der Eeckhaut et al., 2010 (9 variables); Sterlacchini et al., 2011 (9 variables)). Nevertheless, the evaluation of the weight of each landslide predisposing factor within the predictive model through a thorough sensitivity analysis is frequently missing. In addition, the application of statistic bivariate methods to assess landslide susceptibility assumes conditional independence (CI) of the landslide predisposing factors (Bonham-Carter et al., 1989; Agterberg et al., 1993; Van Westen, 1993; Agterberg and Cheng, 2002; Thiart et al., 2003; Thiery et al., 2007). Blahut et al. (2010) pointed out that spatial probabilities are overestimated when conditional independence is not verified. In this study, the aim is to determine the best combination of landslide predisposing variables using a bivariate statistical model, based on the assessment of goodness of fit and predictive power, using variables that have a high degree of conditional independence. In addition, we assess the number of unique conditions within each landslide susceptibility model associated to each combination of landslide predisposing variables. This number should be minimized when landslide susceptibility maps are made for land use planning and management in order to avoid the over partitioning of the study area.Copernicus PublicationsRepositório da Universidade de LisboaPereira, SusanaZêzere, JoséBateira, Carlos2019-02-14T12:17:03Z20122012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/37000engPereira, S., Zezere, J. L., & Bateira, C. (2012). Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(4), 979–988. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-979-2012.1561-863310.5194/nhess-12-979-2012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-17T14:03:31Zoai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/37000Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T03:01:33.198225Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
title Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
spellingShingle Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
Pereira, Susana
Landslide predisposing factors
Shallow landslide susceptibility models
title_short Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
title_full Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
title_fullStr Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
title_full_unstemmed Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
title_sort Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models
author Pereira, Susana
author_facet Pereira, Susana
Zêzere, José
Bateira, Carlos
author_role author
author2 Zêzere, José
Bateira, Carlos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Susana
Zêzere, José
Bateira, Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Landslide predisposing factors
Shallow landslide susceptibility models
topic Landslide predisposing factors
Shallow landslide susceptibility models
description The aim of this study is to identify the landslide predisposing factors’ combination using a bivariate statistical model that best predicts landslide susceptibility. The best model is one that has simultaneously good performance in terms of suitability and predictive power and has been developed using variables that are conditionally independent. The study area is the Santa Marta de Penaguiao council (70 km ˜ 2 ) located in the Northern Portugal. In order to identify the best combination of landslide predisposing factors, all possible combinations using up to seven predisposing factors were performed, which resulted in 120 predictions that were assessed with a landside inventory containing 767 shallow translational slides. The best landslide susceptibility model was selected according to the model degree of fitness and on the basis of a conditional independence criterion. The best model was developed with only three landslide predisposing factors (slope angle, inverse wetness index, and land use) and was compared with a model developed using all seven landslide predisposing factors. Results showed that it is possible to produce a reliable landslide susceptibility model using fewer landslide predisposing factors, which contributes towards higher conditional independence. 1 Introduction Recent developments in GIS software and increasing computing power allow a substantially high number of independent variables to be used in empirical, data-driven landslide susceptibility models. Recent studies in landslide susceptibility models usually involve over a dozen variables considered as predisposing factors of slope instability (e.g. Lee et al., 2002 (13 variables); Lee and Choi, 2004 (15 variables); van der Eeckhaut et al., 2010 (9 variables); Sterlacchini et al., 2011 (9 variables)). Nevertheless, the evaluation of the weight of each landslide predisposing factor within the predictive model through a thorough sensitivity analysis is frequently missing. In addition, the application of statistic bivariate methods to assess landslide susceptibility assumes conditional independence (CI) of the landslide predisposing factors (Bonham-Carter et al., 1989; Agterberg et al., 1993; Van Westen, 1993; Agterberg and Cheng, 2002; Thiart et al., 2003; Thiery et al., 2007). Blahut et al. (2010) pointed out that spatial probabilities are overestimated when conditional independence is not verified. In this study, the aim is to determine the best combination of landslide predisposing variables using a bivariate statistical model, based on the assessment of goodness of fit and predictive power, using variables that have a high degree of conditional independence. In addition, we assess the number of unique conditions within each landslide susceptibility model associated to each combination of landslide predisposing variables. This number should be minimized when landslide susceptibility maps are made for land use planning and management in order to avoid the over partitioning of the study area.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-02-14T12:17:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37000
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37000
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pereira, S., Zezere, J. L., & Bateira, C. (2012). Technical note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(4), 979–988. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-979-2012.
1561-8633
10.5194/nhess-12-979-2012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Copernicus Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Copernicus Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833601567850233856