GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2010 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6082 |
Summary: | This paper estimates von Neumann and Morgenstern utility functions comparing the generalized maximum entropy (GME) with OLS, using data obtained by utility elici-tation methods. Thus, it provides a comparison of the performance of the two esti-mators in a real data small sample setup. The results confirm the ones obtained for small samples through Monte Carlo simulations. Overall the results suggest that GME is an interesting alternative to OLS in the estimation of utility functions when data is generated by utility elicitation methods. |
id |
RCAP_aa18f4b9af671fb1072564f86f6fb544 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/6082 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions?GMEUtility functionsOLSThis paper estimates von Neumann and Morgenstern utility functions comparing the generalized maximum entropy (GME) with OLS, using data obtained by utility elici-tation methods. Thus, it provides a comparison of the performance of the two esti-mators in a real data small sample setup. The results confirm the ones obtained for small samples through Monte Carlo simulations. Overall the results suggest that GME is an interesting alternative to OLS in the estimation of utility functions when data is generated by utility elicitation methods.Universidade de Évora2012-11-28T12:40:13Z2012-11-282010-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/6082http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6082porPires, C., Dionísio, A., Coelho, L. (2010) GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions?, II Workshop Perspectives on Econophysics, Proceedings of the Workshop Perspectives on Econophysics II, Universidade de Évora, Novembro de 2010.M-47478-2010cpires@uevora.ptandreia@uevora.ptlcoelho@uevora.pt637Pires, CesaltinaDionísio, AndreiaCoelho, Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:45:28Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/6082Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T11:55:53.202124Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
title |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
spellingShingle |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? Pires, Cesaltina GME Utility functions OLS |
title_short |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
title_full |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
title_fullStr |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
title_full_unstemmed |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
title_sort |
GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions? |
author |
Pires, Cesaltina |
author_facet |
Pires, Cesaltina Dionísio, Andreia Coelho, Luís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dionísio, Andreia Coelho, Luís |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pires, Cesaltina Dionísio, Andreia Coelho, Luís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
GME Utility functions OLS |
topic |
GME Utility functions OLS |
description |
This paper estimates von Neumann and Morgenstern utility functions comparing the generalized maximum entropy (GME) with OLS, using data obtained by utility elici-tation methods. Thus, it provides a comparison of the performance of the two esti-mators in a real data small sample setup. The results confirm the ones obtained for small samples through Monte Carlo simulations. Overall the results suggest that GME is an interesting alternative to OLS in the estimation of utility functions when data is generated by utility elicitation methods. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z 2012-11-28T12:40:13Z 2012-11-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6082 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6082 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6082 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Pires, C., Dionísio, A., Coelho, L. (2010) GME versus OLS - Which is the best to estimate utility functions?, II Workshop Perspectives on Econophysics, Proceedings of the Workshop Perspectives on Econophysics II, Universidade de Évora, Novembro de 2010. M-47478-2010 cpires@uevora.pt andreia@uevora.pt lcoelho@uevora.pt 637 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Évora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Évora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833592358197788672 |