Export Ready — 

Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Monteiro, Natália P.
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Straume, Odd Rune, Valente, Marieta
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/62137
Summary: Whether or not the use of remote work increases firm labour productivity is theoretically ambiguous. We use a rich and representative sample of Portuguese firms, and within-firm variation in the policy on remote work, over the period 2011-2016, to empirically assess the causal productivity effect of remote work. Our findings from estimations of models with firm fixed effects suggest that the average productivity effect of allowing remote work is significantly negative, though relatively small in magnitude. However, we also find a substantial degree of heterogeneity across different categories of firms. In particular, we find evidence of opposite effects of remote work for firms that do not undertake R&D activities and for firms that do, where remote work has a significantly negative (positive) effect on labour productivity for the former (latter) type of firms. Negative effects of remote work are also more likely for small firms that do not export and employ a workforce with a below-average skill level.
id RCAP_a8c7b87c5356e955c541d326d987408b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/62137
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from PortugalRemote workFirm labour productivityPanel dataWhether or not the use of remote work increases firm labour productivity is theoretically ambiguous. We use a rich and representative sample of Portuguese firms, and within-firm variation in the policy on remote work, over the period 2011-2016, to empirically assess the causal productivity effect of remote work. Our findings from estimations of models with firm fixed effects suggest that the average productivity effect of allowing remote work is significantly negative, though relatively small in magnitude. However, we also find a substantial degree of heterogeneity across different categories of firms. In particular, we find evidence of opposite effects of remote work for firms that do not undertake R&D activities and for firms that do, where remote work has a significantly negative (positive) effect on labour productivity for the former (latter) type of firms. Negative effects of remote work are also more likely for small firms that do not export and employ a workforce with a below-average skill level.This paper is financed by National Funds of the FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology within the project "UID/ECO/03182/2019".Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas (NIPE)Universidade do MinhoMonteiro, Natália P.Straume, Odd RuneValente, Marieta20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/62137enghttps://www.eeg.uminho.pt/pt/investigar/nipe/Paginas/publicacoes.aspxinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T07:06:15Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/62137Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T16:15:25.797788Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
title Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
spellingShingle Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
Monteiro, Natália P.
Remote work
Firm labour productivity
Panel data
title_short Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
title_full Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
title_fullStr Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
title_sort Does remote work improve or impair firm labour productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal
author Monteiro, Natália P.
author_facet Monteiro, Natália P.
Straume, Odd Rune
Valente, Marieta
author_role author
author2 Straume, Odd Rune
Valente, Marieta
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Natália P.
Straume, Odd Rune
Valente, Marieta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Remote work
Firm labour productivity
Panel data
topic Remote work
Firm labour productivity
Panel data
description Whether or not the use of remote work increases firm labour productivity is theoretically ambiguous. We use a rich and representative sample of Portuguese firms, and within-firm variation in the policy on remote work, over the period 2011-2016, to empirically assess the causal productivity effect of remote work. Our findings from estimations of models with firm fixed effects suggest that the average productivity effect of allowing remote work is significantly negative, though relatively small in magnitude. However, we also find a substantial degree of heterogeneity across different categories of firms. In particular, we find evidence of opposite effects of remote work for firms that do not undertake R&D activities and for firms that do, where remote work has a significantly negative (positive) effect on labour productivity for the former (latter) type of firms. Negative effects of remote work are also more likely for small firms that do not export and employ a workforce with a below-average skill level.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/62137
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/62137
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.eeg.uminho.pt/pt/investigar/nipe/Paginas/publicacoes.aspx
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas (NIPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas (NIPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833595837332062208