Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barlow, Horace B.
Publication Date: 2010
Other Authors: Berry, David L.
Format: Conference object
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6910
Summary: 50 years ago Hubel and Wiesel discovered simple and complex cells in V1, but there is still no consensus on their functional roles. It is agreed that complex cells are more often selective for direction of motion than simple cells, that there are differences in the way they combine information within their receptive fields, and that complex cells probably receive most of their input from simple cells, but what this serial hierarchy achieves is not understood. There is another puzzling dichotomy that we think is related, namely that of cross-correlation, which is widely accepted as the operation performed on the input image by simple cells, and auto-correlation, which some think underlies the perception of Glass patterns, and possibly motion. We propose the hypothesis that complex cells signal auto-correlations in the visual image, but to evaluate them they require the preliminary analysis done by simple cells, and also pinwheels - structures intervening between simple cells and complex cells that were quite unknown to Hubel and Wiesel. We shall first present psychophysical evidence, using a new kind of random dot display, which suggests that both cross-correlation and auto-correlation are performed in early vision. We then point to recent evidence on the micro-circuitry of pinwheels, and mappings of their intrinsic activity, which shows how pinwheels might enable complex cells to respond selectively to autocorrelations in the input image that activates the simple cells. Auto-correlation is a powerful tool for detecting symmetry, and many may be surprised by evidence that such an abstract property is detected so early in visual perception.
id RCAP_a8266e66fe32a8dd9622644d389864d3
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/6910
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1VisionVisual processing50 years ago Hubel and Wiesel discovered simple and complex cells in V1, but there is still no consensus on their functional roles. It is agreed that complex cells are more often selective for direction of motion than simple cells, that there are differences in the way they combine information within their receptive fields, and that complex cells probably receive most of their input from simple cells, but what this serial hierarchy achieves is not understood. There is another puzzling dichotomy that we think is related, namely that of cross-correlation, which is widely accepted as the operation performed on the input image by simple cells, and auto-correlation, which some think underlies the perception of Glass patterns, and possibly motion. We propose the hypothesis that complex cells signal auto-correlations in the visual image, but to evaluate them they require the preliminary analysis done by simple cells, and also pinwheels - structures intervening between simple cells and complex cells that were quite unknown to Hubel and Wiesel. We shall first present psychophysical evidence, using a new kind of random dot display, which suggests that both cross-correlation and auto-correlation are performed in early vision. We then point to recent evidence on the micro-circuitry of pinwheels, and mappings of their intrinsic activity, which shows how pinwheels might enable complex cells to respond selectively to autocorrelations in the input image that activates the simple cells. Auto-correlation is a powerful tool for detecting symmetry, and many may be surprised by evidence that such an abstract property is detected so early in visual perception.Front. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 20102012-12-21T12:23:31Z2012-12-212010-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/6910http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6910engBarlow, H.B. & Berry, D.L. Evidence for a Neural Model to Evaluate Symmetry in V1. Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010.http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/AbstractDetails.aspx?ABS_DOI=10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.03.00038&eid=770&sname=Computational_and_Systems_Neuroscience_2010simnaonaonddberry@uevora.pt360Barlow, Horace B.Berry, David L.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:46:37Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/6910Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T11:56:49.315555Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
title Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
spellingShingle Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
Barlow, Horace B.
Vision
Visual processing
title_short Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
title_full Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
title_fullStr Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
title_sort Evidence for a neural model to evaluate symmetry in V1
author Barlow, Horace B.
author_facet Barlow, Horace B.
Berry, David L.
author_role author
author2 Berry, David L.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barlow, Horace B.
Berry, David L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vision
Visual processing
topic Vision
Visual processing
description 50 years ago Hubel and Wiesel discovered simple and complex cells in V1, but there is still no consensus on their functional roles. It is agreed that complex cells are more often selective for direction of motion than simple cells, that there are differences in the way they combine information within their receptive fields, and that complex cells probably receive most of their input from simple cells, but what this serial hierarchy achieves is not understood. There is another puzzling dichotomy that we think is related, namely that of cross-correlation, which is widely accepted as the operation performed on the input image by simple cells, and auto-correlation, which some think underlies the perception of Glass patterns, and possibly motion. We propose the hypothesis that complex cells signal auto-correlations in the visual image, but to evaluate them they require the preliminary analysis done by simple cells, and also pinwheels - structures intervening between simple cells and complex cells that were quite unknown to Hubel and Wiesel. We shall first present psychophysical evidence, using a new kind of random dot display, which suggests that both cross-correlation and auto-correlation are performed in early vision. We then point to recent evidence on the micro-circuitry of pinwheels, and mappings of their intrinsic activity, which shows how pinwheels might enable complex cells to respond selectively to autocorrelations in the input image that activates the simple cells. Auto-correlation is a powerful tool for detecting symmetry, and many may be surprised by evidence that such an abstract property is detected so early in visual perception.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012-12-21T12:23:31Z
2012-12-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6910
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6910
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6910
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Barlow, H.B. & Berry, D.L. Evidence for a Neural Model to Evaluate Symmetry in V1. Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010.
http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/AbstractDetails.aspx?ABS_DOI=10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.03.00038&eid=770&sname=Computational_and_Systems_Neuroscience_2010
sim
nao
nao
nd
dberry@uevora.pt
360
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Front. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Front. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833592367942205440