Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
Publication Date: 2009
Other Authors: Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de, Ramalho, José Carlos, Henriques, Pedro Rangel
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741
Summary: Topic map constraint language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of topic maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of topic maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma and XTche relate to TMCL? What kind of constraints each one of these three cannot specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those topic maps constraint languages over the use case proposed.
id RCAP_a1929422452af966a0dce8def44c41e7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/9741
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparingKnowledge representationTopic mapsConstraint languagesXMLIntelligent systemsTopic map constraint language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of topic maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of topic maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma and XTche relate to TMCL? What kind of constraints each one of these three cannot specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those topic maps constraint languages over the use case proposed.(undefined)InderscienceUniversidade do MinhoLibrelotto, Giovani RubertAzevedo, Renato Preigschadt deRamalho, José CarlosHenriques, Pedro Rangel20092009-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741eng"International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems". ISSN 1755-0556. 1:3-4 (2009) 173 - 181.1755-055610.1504/IJRIS.2009.028016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T06:19:39Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/9741Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T15:49:12.321322Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
title Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
spellingShingle Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
Knowledge representation
Topic maps
Constraint languages
XML
Intelligent systems
title_short Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
title_full Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
title_fullStr Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
title_full_unstemmed Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
title_sort Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
author Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
author_facet Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de
Ramalho, José Carlos
Henriques, Pedro Rangel
author_role author
author2 Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de
Ramalho, José Carlos
Henriques, Pedro Rangel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de
Ramalho, José Carlos
Henriques, Pedro Rangel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Knowledge representation
Topic maps
Constraint languages
XML
Intelligent systems
topic Knowledge representation
Topic maps
Constraint languages
XML
Intelligent systems
description Topic map constraint language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of topic maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of topic maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma and XTche relate to TMCL? What kind of constraints each one of these three cannot specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those topic maps constraint languages over the use case proposed.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems". ISSN 1755-0556. 1:3-4 (2009) 173 - 181.
1755-0556
10.1504/IJRIS.2009.028016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inderscience
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inderscience
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833595558765264896