The utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the risk stratification of prostate cancer using a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging without endorectal coil

• Main Author: Lopes Dias, João
• Publication Date: 2017
• Other Authors: Magalhães Pina, João, Vasco Costa, Nuno, Carmo, Sandra, Leal, Cecília, Bilhim, Tiago, Mateus Marques, Rui, Campos Pinheiro, Luís
• Format: Article
• Language: eng
• Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
• Download full: https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.33.3.33
• topic: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Gleason score; Risk stratification; Ressonância magnética multiparamétrica; Cancro da próstata; Coeficiente aparente de difusão; Score de Gleason; Estratificação de risco

PurposeTo evaluate the relationship between mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and post-surgical Gleason scores. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) on a 1.5T magnet in distinguishing low, intermediate and high-grade prostate tumors.Material and methodsThis is a retrospective institutional-review-board-approved, single-center study including 30 patients (median age, 60 years) who underwent mp-MRI before prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Using histological reports for guidance, the tumors were localized in ADC maps, and mean ADCs were measured and examined for correlation with Gleason scores. 2 patients had 2 measurable foci, so a total of 32 tumors were studied. The diagnostic accuracy of the mean ADC was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).ResultsIn the differentiation of tumors with a Gleason score of 6 from those with a Gleason score of at least 7, mean ADC yielded an AUC of 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.93). In the differentiation of tumors with Gleason scores of 6 or 7 from those with a Gleason score of at least 8, mean ADC yielded an AUC of 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.86, 1.00).ConclusionMean ADC values may allow a correct assessment of the patient risk using a 1.5T magnet without ERC.