Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teixeira,Gabriela
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Pinto,Pedro Sá, Silva,Ivone, Gonçalves,João, Teixeira,Sérgio, Rego,Duarte, Ferreira,Vítor, Antunes,Inês, Veiga,Carlos, Mendes,Daniel, Teles,Paulo, Matos,Arlindo, Almeida,Rui
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2019000200001
Summary: Introduction: A number of guidelines for the management of carotid disease are available to help clinicians in therapeutic decision and provide useful guidance for the best care of the patients. They stated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has some benefit in symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis of 50-69% and is highly beneficial in stenosis of 70-99%, with mortality/ stroke rate less than 6%. The maximum benefit is observed when surgery is performed within two weeks after the cerebrovascular event. CEA in asymptomatic patients should be offered to patients with life expectancy higher than 5 years, stenosis of &gt;70%, and perioperative complications should be less than 3%. The aim of this study is to analyse our clinical practice, review treated patients and referral times and compare the outcomes of our institutional practice with published guidelines. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto between 2010 and 2015. Results: Between 2010 and 2015, 404 patients underwent CEA, 76% men, and mean age 69 years for both sexes. The degree of stenosis was usually evaluated by ultrasound. The use of complementary study with angio-CT was required in 20% and angiography in 2.2% of the cases. The majority of patients (54.2%) were symptomatic (stroke/ TIA <6 months). In patients with a cerebrovascular event diagnosed at our institution, the time to surgery was 10 days (median). All CEA were performed under general anaesthesia and for arterial closure, a Dacronpatch was systematically used. Shunt was used in 4.6% of cases (n=18). The mean surgery time was 101 minutes and the mean clamping time was 40 minutes. Reversal of antioagulation with protamine was performed in 48.3% patients. Morbimortality: 9 post-operative sequelae events (major stroke), 8 minimal / transient deficit (minor stroke) and 4 deaths. In symptomatic patients (n = 219), the rate of postoperative major stroke was 3.6%. In asymptomatic patients (n = 185), a major and a minor stroke was observed (1.1%). Other complications: haematoma 5.9% (n=24); infection 0.2% (n=1); peripheral nerve dysfunction 8.7% (n=35); false aneurysm 0.5% (n=2). Conclusions: Our results are within the reference values. This study allowed us to know our reality, our ability to give an effective answer for our patients, and to serve as a basis for improving ways of acting.
id RCAP_9f9f731160a3d6e88f95d673dec84831
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-706X2019000200001
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practiceCarotid disease guidelinesCarotid disease symptomatic and asymptomaticCarotid endarterectomyComplicationsIntroduction: A number of guidelines for the management of carotid disease are available to help clinicians in therapeutic decision and provide useful guidance for the best care of the patients. They stated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has some benefit in symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis of 50-69% and is highly beneficial in stenosis of 70-99%, with mortality/ stroke rate less than 6%. The maximum benefit is observed when surgery is performed within two weeks after the cerebrovascular event. CEA in asymptomatic patients should be offered to patients with life expectancy higher than 5 years, stenosis of &gt;70%, and perioperative complications should be less than 3%. The aim of this study is to analyse our clinical practice, review treated patients and referral times and compare the outcomes of our institutional practice with published guidelines. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto between 2010 and 2015. Results: Between 2010 and 2015, 404 patients underwent CEA, 76% men, and mean age 69 years for both sexes. The degree of stenosis was usually evaluated by ultrasound. The use of complementary study with angio-CT was required in 20% and angiography in 2.2% of the cases. The majority of patients (54.2%) were symptomatic (stroke/ TIA <6 months). In patients with a cerebrovascular event diagnosed at our institution, the time to surgery was 10 days (median). All CEA were performed under general anaesthesia and for arterial closure, a Dacronpatch was systematically used. Shunt was used in 4.6% of cases (n=18). The mean surgery time was 101 minutes and the mean clamping time was 40 minutes. Reversal of antioagulation with protamine was performed in 48.3% patients. Morbimortality: 9 post-operative sequelae events (major stroke), 8 minimal / transient deficit (minor stroke) and 4 deaths. In symptomatic patients (n = 219), the rate of postoperative major stroke was 3.6%. In asymptomatic patients (n = 185), a major and a minor stroke was observed (1.1%). Other complications: haematoma 5.9% (n=24); infection 0.2% (n=1); peripheral nerve dysfunction 8.7% (n=35); false aneurysm 0.5% (n=2). Conclusions: Our results are within the reference values. This study allowed us to know our reality, our ability to give an effective answer for our patients, and to serve as a basis for improving ways of acting.Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2019000200001Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.15 n.2 2019reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2019000200001Teixeira,GabrielaPinto,Pedro SáSilva,IvoneGonçalves,JoãoTeixeira,SérgioRego,DuarteFerreira,VítorAntunes,InêsVeiga,CarlosMendes,DanielTeles,PauloMatos,ArlindoAlmeida,Ruiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:22:54Zoai:scielo:S1646-706X2019000200001Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:10:17.940827Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
title Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
spellingShingle Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
Teixeira,Gabriela
Carotid disease guidelines
Carotid disease symptomatic and asymptomatic
Carotid endarterectomy
Complications
title_short Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
title_full Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
title_fullStr Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
title_full_unstemmed Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
title_sort Carotid endarterectomy: guidelines versus real-world practice
author Teixeira,Gabriela
author_facet Teixeira,Gabriela
Pinto,Pedro Sá
Silva,Ivone
Gonçalves,João
Teixeira,Sérgio
Rego,Duarte
Ferreira,Vítor
Antunes,Inês
Veiga,Carlos
Mendes,Daniel
Teles,Paulo
Matos,Arlindo
Almeida,Rui
author_role author
author2 Pinto,Pedro Sá
Silva,Ivone
Gonçalves,João
Teixeira,Sérgio
Rego,Duarte
Ferreira,Vítor
Antunes,Inês
Veiga,Carlos
Mendes,Daniel
Teles,Paulo
Matos,Arlindo
Almeida,Rui
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira,Gabriela
Pinto,Pedro Sá
Silva,Ivone
Gonçalves,João
Teixeira,Sérgio
Rego,Duarte
Ferreira,Vítor
Antunes,Inês
Veiga,Carlos
Mendes,Daniel
Teles,Paulo
Matos,Arlindo
Almeida,Rui
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carotid disease guidelines
Carotid disease symptomatic and asymptomatic
Carotid endarterectomy
Complications
topic Carotid disease guidelines
Carotid disease symptomatic and asymptomatic
Carotid endarterectomy
Complications
description Introduction: A number of guidelines for the management of carotid disease are available to help clinicians in therapeutic decision and provide useful guidance for the best care of the patients. They stated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has some benefit in symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis of 50-69% and is highly beneficial in stenosis of 70-99%, with mortality/ stroke rate less than 6%. The maximum benefit is observed when surgery is performed within two weeks after the cerebrovascular event. CEA in asymptomatic patients should be offered to patients with life expectancy higher than 5 years, stenosis of &gt;70%, and perioperative complications should be less than 3%. The aim of this study is to analyse our clinical practice, review treated patients and referral times and compare the outcomes of our institutional practice with published guidelines. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto between 2010 and 2015. Results: Between 2010 and 2015, 404 patients underwent CEA, 76% men, and mean age 69 years for both sexes. The degree of stenosis was usually evaluated by ultrasound. The use of complementary study with angio-CT was required in 20% and angiography in 2.2% of the cases. The majority of patients (54.2%) were symptomatic (stroke/ TIA <6 months). In patients with a cerebrovascular event diagnosed at our institution, the time to surgery was 10 days (median). All CEA were performed under general anaesthesia and for arterial closure, a Dacronpatch was systematically used. Shunt was used in 4.6% of cases (n=18). The mean surgery time was 101 minutes and the mean clamping time was 40 minutes. Reversal of antioagulation with protamine was performed in 48.3% patients. Morbimortality: 9 post-operative sequelae events (major stroke), 8 minimal / transient deficit (minor stroke) and 4 deaths. In symptomatic patients (n = 219), the rate of postoperative major stroke was 3.6%. In asymptomatic patients (n = 185), a major and a minor stroke was observed (1.1%). Other complications: haematoma 5.9% (n=24); infection 0.2% (n=1); peripheral nerve dysfunction 8.7% (n=35); false aneurysm 0.5% (n=2). Conclusions: Our results are within the reference values. This study allowed us to know our reality, our ability to give an effective answer for our patients, and to serve as a basis for improving ways of acting.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2019000200001
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2019000200001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2019000200001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.15 n.2 2019
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593501066985472