Adverse reactions to dry needling therapy: insights from Polish physiotherapy practice

• Autor(a) principal: Trybulski, Robert
• Data de Publicação: 2024
• Outros Autores: Kuzdzal, Adrian, Kiljanski, Marek, Galeziok, Kamil, Matuszczyk, Filip, Kawczynski, Adam, Clemente, Filipe Manuel
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4294
• topic: Dry needling; Physiotherapy; Therapeutics; Adverse effects

Background/Objectives: The current study aimed to characterize the adverse reactions associated with dry needling (DN) treatments reported by Polish physiotherapists, with a secondary objective of investigating whether the level of DN experience influences the occurrence of these adverse effects. Methods: Atotal of 102 Polish physiotherapists, all with regular DN practice, participated in an ad hoc online survey. Theparticipants were categorized by their level of experience in DN treatment: 44 with 0–2 years, 43 with 3–6 years, and 15 with more than 7 years of experience. The survey consisted of 27 questions focused on both mild and severe adverse effects resulting from DN treatments. Results: The results showed that in the short term (over the past week), minor bleeding was the most commonly reported mild adverse effect (70%), followed closely by slightly pain during treatment (68%). Slight pain following treatment was also reported by 52% ofrespondents. No significant relationship was found between experience with dry needling (DN) and the reporting of mild adverse effects, with the exception of tingling (X(2) = 10.958; p = 0.004). In the retrospective analysis of the past month, most respondents reported experiencing bleeding between one and three times (49%), while bruising occurred one to three times in 44% of cases. Similarly, 44% of respondents noted pain after treatment one to three times, and 47% experienced pain during DN at this frequency. A significant interaction with DN experience was observed in the frequency of drowsiness reported over the past month (X(10) = 19.735; p = 0.032). Conclusions: Severe adverse effects were extremely rare in clinical practice: pneumothorax and shock were each reported by 3% of respondents, nerve palsy by 14%, infection by 2%, and hospitalization by 1%. In conclusion, this study suggests that most adverse effects are mild, typically involving bleeding and slight pain during or after treatment. Additionally, DN experience does not appear to be a significant factor influencing the type or prevalence of these adverse effects.