Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2000 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3.9794 |
Summary: | Objectifs: To review the indications of permanent cardiac pacing, focusing on essentials aspects of follow-up of patients with pacemaker, namely the detection of dysfunctions, complications, and electromagnetic interferences. Methods: critical review of the literature. Conclusions: The current indications for cardiac pacing are no longer restricted to the classical ones, being today a reality in some situations related to obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, neurally mediated syncope and atrial fibrillation prevention. Some controversy subsists though, specially in defining the subgroups which benefit this therapy the most.Generators implanted today are small, have low energy consumption and increased longevity. Contemporary leads also have small calibre, high flexibility and durability, being steroid-eluting, which allows simpler and faster interventions and fine chronic pacing thresholds. Pacemaker follow-up should be accomplished by cardiac pacing specialised physicians, in order to take advantage of all the diagnostic and therapeutic functions available in the contemporary generators. The non-cardiologist physician´s role consists in the exclusion of all situations that might traduce pacing disfunction. Therefore, the author describes a number of signs and symptoms usually referred by patients and their relative importance, and enunciates the most frequent complications in permanent cardiac pacing and the subsequent adequate procedures.Electromagnetic interferences are unfrequent and mostly transient, although they may be potencially catastrophic in pacing dependent patients after prolonged exposure and under certain circunstances. Some specific situations are reviewed, particularly the issue of the use of cellular phones. It is now believed that their use is not contraindicated as long as a 15 cm security distance is kept between the generator and the cellular phone. |
id |
RCAP_9a271f3f5ef38c44c030f35619f29ec5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/9794 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patientIndicações actuais e futuras para terapêutica eléctrica. Seguimento do portador de pacemaker.Pacing cardíacofollow-up de pacinginsuficiência cardíacamiocardiopatia hipertróficafibrilhação auricularinterferências electromagnéticasCardiac pacingFollow-up of pacingHeart failureCardiomyopathy hypertrophicAtrial fibrillationElectromagnetic interferencesObjectifs: To review the indications of permanent cardiac pacing, focusing on essentials aspects of follow-up of patients with pacemaker, namely the detection of dysfunctions, complications, and electromagnetic interferences. Methods: critical review of the literature. Conclusions: The current indications for cardiac pacing are no longer restricted to the classical ones, being today a reality in some situations related to obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, neurally mediated syncope and atrial fibrillation prevention. Some controversy subsists though, specially in defining the subgroups which benefit this therapy the most.Generators implanted today are small, have low energy consumption and increased longevity. Contemporary leads also have small calibre, high flexibility and durability, being steroid-eluting, which allows simpler and faster interventions and fine chronic pacing thresholds. Pacemaker follow-up should be accomplished by cardiac pacing specialised physicians, in order to take advantage of all the diagnostic and therapeutic functions available in the contemporary generators. The non-cardiologist physician´s role consists in the exclusion of all situations that might traduce pacing disfunction. Therefore, the author describes a number of signs and symptoms usually referred by patients and their relative importance, and enunciates the most frequent complications in permanent cardiac pacing and the subsequent adequate procedures.Electromagnetic interferences are unfrequent and mostly transient, although they may be potencially catastrophic in pacing dependent patients after prolonged exposure and under certain circunstances. Some specific situations are reviewed, particularly the issue of the use of cellular phones. It is now believed that their use is not contraindicated as long as a 15 cm security distance is kept between the generator and the cellular phone.Objectivos: Rever as indicações actuais (e futuras) da terapêutica eléctrica permanente e indicar os aspectos essenciais do seguimento do doente portador de pacemaker, nomeadamente detecção de disfunções, complicações e possíveis interferências electromagnéticas. Métodos: Revisão crítica da literatura. Conclusões: As indicações actuais para pacing cardíaco não estão circunscritas às clàssicamente descritas, sendo hoje uma realidade em algumas situações relacionadas com miocardiopatia hipertrófica obstrutiva, insuficiência cardíaca, sincope neurogénica e prevenção da fibrilhação auricular. Subsiste alguma controvérsia, sobretudo na definição dos subgrupos que mais beneficiam desta terapêutica. Os geradores implantados são hoje pequenos, têm baixo consumo enérgético e uma longevidade acrescida. Os eléctrodos são também, no momento actual, de pequeno calibre, de grande flexibilidade e durabilidade, sendo revestidos de corticosteróides o que permite intervenções mais simples e mais rápidas e bons limiares crónicos. O seguimento do portador de pacemaker deve ser realizado por médicos especialistas em pacing cardíaco de modo a aproveitar as funções diagnósticas e terapêuticas disponíveis nos geradores actuais. O papel do médico não cardiologista, consiste na exclusão das situações que podem traduzir disfunção do sistema de pacing, pelo que o autor descreve alguns sintomas e sinais referidos habitualmente pelos doentes e sua importância relativa. São enunciadas as complicações mais frequentes em pacing cardíaco permanente e a consequente atitude a tomar. As interferências electromagnéticas são pouco frequentes e quase sempre transitórias, podendo, no entanto, ser catastróficas nos doentes que não têm ritmo próprio (pacing dependentes) após exposição prolongada e sob determinadas condições. São revistas algumas situações específicas, com incidência particular no uso de telefones portáteis. Considera-se, actualmente, que a sua utilização não está contraindicada, desde que seja guardada uma distância de segurança de 15 cm entre o gerador e o telemóvel.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2000-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3.9794https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3.9794Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2000): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 221-38Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2000): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 221-38Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 16 N.º 3 (2000): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 221-382182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v16i3reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/9794https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/9794/9532Martins, Vítor PauloPitta, Maria LuzPeres, MarisaSilva, Graça Ferreira Dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:58:08Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/9794Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:50:26.512641Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient Indicações actuais e futuras para terapêutica eléctrica. Seguimento do portador de pacemaker. |
title |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient |
spellingShingle |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient Martins, Vítor Paulo Pacing cardíaco follow-up de pacing insuficiência cardíaca miocardiopatia hipertrófica fibrilhação auricular interferências electromagnéticas Cardiac pacing Follow-up of pacing Heart failure Cardiomyopathy hypertrophic Atrial fibrillation Electromagnetic interferences |
title_short |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient |
title_full |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient |
title_fullStr |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient |
title_sort |
Current and future indications for cardiac pacing: follow-up of the pacemaker patient |
author |
Martins, Vítor Paulo |
author_facet |
Martins, Vítor Paulo Pitta, Maria Luz Peres, Marisa Silva, Graça Ferreira Da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pitta, Maria Luz Peres, Marisa Silva, Graça Ferreira Da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Vítor Paulo Pitta, Maria Luz Peres, Marisa Silva, Graça Ferreira Da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pacing cardíaco follow-up de pacing insuficiência cardíaca miocardiopatia hipertrófica fibrilhação auricular interferências electromagnéticas Cardiac pacing Follow-up of pacing Heart failure Cardiomyopathy hypertrophic Atrial fibrillation Electromagnetic interferences |
topic |
Pacing cardíaco follow-up de pacing insuficiência cardíaca miocardiopatia hipertrófica fibrilhação auricular interferências electromagnéticas Cardiac pacing Follow-up of pacing Heart failure Cardiomyopathy hypertrophic Atrial fibrillation Electromagnetic interferences |
description |
Objectifs: To review the indications of permanent cardiac pacing, focusing on essentials aspects of follow-up of patients with pacemaker, namely the detection of dysfunctions, complications, and electromagnetic interferences. Methods: critical review of the literature. Conclusions: The current indications for cardiac pacing are no longer restricted to the classical ones, being today a reality in some situations related to obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, neurally mediated syncope and atrial fibrillation prevention. Some controversy subsists though, specially in defining the subgroups which benefit this therapy the most.Generators implanted today are small, have low energy consumption and increased longevity. Contemporary leads also have small calibre, high flexibility and durability, being steroid-eluting, which allows simpler and faster interventions and fine chronic pacing thresholds. Pacemaker follow-up should be accomplished by cardiac pacing specialised physicians, in order to take advantage of all the diagnostic and therapeutic functions available in the contemporary generators. The non-cardiologist physician´s role consists in the exclusion of all situations that might traduce pacing disfunction. Therefore, the author describes a number of signs and symptoms usually referred by patients and their relative importance, and enunciates the most frequent complications in permanent cardiac pacing and the subsequent adequate procedures.Electromagnetic interferences are unfrequent and mostly transient, although they may be potencially catastrophic in pacing dependent patients after prolonged exposure and under certain circunstances. Some specific situations are reviewed, particularly the issue of the use of cellular phones. It is now believed that their use is not contraindicated as long as a 15 cm security distance is kept between the generator and the cellular phone. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3.9794 https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3.9794 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3.9794 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/9794 https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/9794/9532 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2000): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 221-38 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2000): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 221-38 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 16 N.º 3 (2000): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 221-38 2182-5181 2182-5173 10.32385/rpmgf.v16i3 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597697733427200 |