Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinho, Micaela
Publication Date: 2016
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682
Summary: This qualitative/quantitative study examines the ethical dilemma of microallocation of health resources. It seeks to identify and compare the opinion of two groups in Portuguese society – students and health professionals – on the importance of personal characteristics of patients at the moment of prioritizing them and if the choices can be explained by bioethical references of a utilitarian or deontological nature. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire administered to a sample of 180 students and 60 health professionals. Faced with hypothetical emergency scenarios, the respondents had to choose between two patients (distinguished by: age, gender, social responsibility, economic and employment situation, harmful health behaviors and criminal record), duly selecting who to treat and then justifying their choice. The results suggest the existence of differences in choices between the two groups, with health professionals revealing they are less prepared to accept the use of social criteria in a context of scarce resources and co-existence of utilitarian and deontological criteria, with a predominance of efficiency on the part of health professionals and equity on the part of students.
id RCAP_9a1e81a75ed57b81b966566d4e7a9e37
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/1682
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.Critérios sociais e éticos de priorização de pacientes: Uma pesquisa a estudantes e profissionais de saúde em Portugal.Patient selectionUtilitarianismEquityEthical criteriaSeleção de pacientesUtilitarismoEquidadeCritérios éticosThis qualitative/quantitative study examines the ethical dilemma of microallocation of health resources. It seeks to identify and compare the opinion of two groups in Portuguese society – students and health professionals – on the importance of personal characteristics of patients at the moment of prioritizing them and if the choices can be explained by bioethical references of a utilitarian or deontological nature. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire administered to a sample of 180 students and 60 health professionals. Faced with hypothetical emergency scenarios, the respondents had to choose between two patients (distinguished by: age, gender, social responsibility, economic and employment situation, harmful health behaviors and criminal record), duly selecting who to treat and then justifying their choice. The results suggest the existence of differences in choices between the two groups, with health professionals revealing they are less prepared to accept the use of social criteria in a context of scarce resources and co-existence of utilitarian and deontological criteria, with a predominance of efficiency on the part of health professionals and equity on the part of students.O estudo quali-quantitativo explora o dilema ético da microalocação dos recursos da saúde. Objetiva identificar e comparar a opinião de dois grupos da sociedade portuguesa - estudantes e profissionais de saúde sobre a importância das características pessoais dos pacientes no momento de os priorizar e se as escolhas se explicam por referenciais bioéticos de caráter utilitaristas ou deontológicos. Os dados foram recolhidos através de um questionário aplicado a uma amostra de 180 estudantes universitários e 60 profissionais de saúde. Os respondentes perante hipotéticos cená- rios de emergência clínica tiveram de escolher de entre dois pacientes (distinguidos por idade, sexo, responsabilidade social, situação económica e laboral, comportamentos lesivos da saúde e registo criminal) quem tratar e justificar a escolha. Foram usados testes estatísticos de associação para comparar as respostas dos dois grupos e análise de conteúdo para categorizar as justificações. Os resultados sugerem a existência de diferenças nas escolhas dos dois grupos, com os profissionais de saúde a revelarem aceitar menos a utilização de critérios sociais em contexto de escassez e coexistência de critérios utilitaristas e deontológicos, com predomínio da eficiência por parte dos profissionais de saúde e da equidade por parte dos estudantes.2017-01-02T14:29:46Z2017-01-022016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfPinho, M.M. (2016). Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21(12), 3917-3926. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682.http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682Pinho, M.M. (2016). Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21(12), 3917-3926. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682.http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682eng1678-4561DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320152112.17072015http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v21n12/1413-8123-csc-21-12-3917.pdfhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinho, Micaelareponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-01-09T02:11:50Zoai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/1682Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:30:39.904575Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
Critérios sociais e éticos de priorização de pacientes: Uma pesquisa a estudantes e profissionais de saúde em Portugal.
title Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
spellingShingle Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
Pinho, Micaela
Patient selection
Utilitarianism
Equity
Ethical criteria
Seleção de pacientes
Utilitarismo
Equidade
Critérios éticos
title_short Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
title_full Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
title_fullStr Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
title_full_unstemmed Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
title_sort Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal.
author Pinho, Micaela
author_facet Pinho, Micaela
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Micaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patient selection
Utilitarianism
Equity
Ethical criteria
Seleção de pacientes
Utilitarismo
Equidade
Critérios éticos
topic Patient selection
Utilitarianism
Equity
Ethical criteria
Seleção de pacientes
Utilitarismo
Equidade
Critérios éticos
description This qualitative/quantitative study examines the ethical dilemma of microallocation of health resources. It seeks to identify and compare the opinion of two groups in Portuguese society – students and health professionals – on the importance of personal characteristics of patients at the moment of prioritizing them and if the choices can be explained by bioethical references of a utilitarian or deontological nature. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire administered to a sample of 180 students and 60 health professionals. Faced with hypothetical emergency scenarios, the respondents had to choose between two patients (distinguished by: age, gender, social responsibility, economic and employment situation, harmful health behaviors and criminal record), duly selecting who to treat and then justifying their choice. The results suggest the existence of differences in choices between the two groups, with health professionals revealing they are less prepared to accept the use of social criteria in a context of scarce resources and co-existence of utilitarian and deontological criteria, with a predominance of efficiency on the part of health professionals and equity on the part of students.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-01-02T14:29:46Z
2017-01-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Pinho, M.M. (2016). Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21(12), 3917-3926. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682.
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682
Pinho, M.M. (2016). Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21(12), 3917-3926. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682.
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682
identifier_str_mv Pinho, M.M. (2016). Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: A survey of students and health professionals in Portugal. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21(12), 3917-3926. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682.
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1682
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1678-4561
DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320152112.17072015
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v21n12/1413-8123-csc-21-12-3917.pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598144635469824