Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Podulka, Przemysław
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Macek, Wojciech, Branco, Ricardo, Nejad, Reza Masoudi
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113872
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051865
Summary: Characterization of surface topography, roughly divided into measurement and data analysis, can be valuable in the process of validation of the tribological performance of machined parts. Surface topography, especially the roughness, can respond straightly to the machining process and, in some cases, is defined as a fingerprint of the manufacturing. When considering the high precision of surface topography studies, the definition of both S-surface and L-surface can drive many errors that influence the analysis of the accuracy of the manufacturing process. Even if precise measuring equipment (device and method) is provided but received data are processed erroneously, the precision is still lost. From that matter, the precise definition of the S-L surface can be valuable in the roughness evaluation allowing a reduction in the rejection of properly made parts. In this paper, it was proposed how to select an appropriate procedure for the removal of the L- and S- components from the raw measured data. Various types of surface topographies were considered, e.g., plateau-honed (some with burnished oil pockets), turned, milled, ground, laser-textured, ceramic, composite, and, generally, isotropic. They were measured with different (stylus and optical) methods, respectively, and parameters from the ISO 25178 standard were also taken into consideration. It was found that commonly used and available commercial software methods can be valuable and especially helpful in the precise definition of the S-L surface; respectively, its usage requires an appropriate response (knowledge) from the users.
id RCAP_96d68d24e2fc0aba231e4d64986b2954
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/113872
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surfacesurface topographysurface textureroughnessS-L surfaceform removalmeasurement noiseCharacterization of surface topography, roughly divided into measurement and data analysis, can be valuable in the process of validation of the tribological performance of machined parts. Surface topography, especially the roughness, can respond straightly to the machining process and, in some cases, is defined as a fingerprint of the manufacturing. When considering the high precision of surface topography studies, the definition of both S-surface and L-surface can drive many errors that influence the analysis of the accuracy of the manufacturing process. Even if precise measuring equipment (device and method) is provided but received data are processed erroneously, the precision is still lost. From that matter, the precise definition of the S-L surface can be valuable in the roughness evaluation allowing a reduction in the rejection of properly made parts. In this paper, it was proposed how to select an appropriate procedure for the removal of the L- and S- components from the raw measured data. Various types of surface topographies were considered, e.g., plateau-honed (some with burnished oil pockets), turned, milled, ground, laser-textured, ceramic, composite, and, generally, isotropic. They were measured with different (stylus and optical) methods, respectively, and parameters from the ISO 25178 standard were also taken into consideration. It was found that commonly used and available commercial software methods can be valuable and especially helpful in the precise definition of the S-L surface; respectively, its usage requires an appropriate response (knowledge) from the users.MDPI2023-02-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/113872https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113872https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051865eng1996-1944Podulka, PrzemysławMacek, WojciechBranco, RicardoNejad, Reza Masoudiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-03-07T13:03:44Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/113872Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T06:06:43.250461Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
title Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
spellingShingle Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
Podulka, Przemysław
surface topography
surface texture
roughness
S-L surface
form removal
measurement noise
title_short Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
title_full Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
title_fullStr Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
title_full_unstemmed Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
title_sort Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface
author Podulka, Przemysław
author_facet Podulka, Przemysław
Macek, Wojciech
Branco, Ricardo
Nejad, Reza Masoudi
author_role author
author2 Macek, Wojciech
Branco, Ricardo
Nejad, Reza Masoudi
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Podulka, Przemysław
Macek, Wojciech
Branco, Ricardo
Nejad, Reza Masoudi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv surface topography
surface texture
roughness
S-L surface
form removal
measurement noise
topic surface topography
surface texture
roughness
S-L surface
form removal
measurement noise
description Characterization of surface topography, roughly divided into measurement and data analysis, can be valuable in the process of validation of the tribological performance of machined parts. Surface topography, especially the roughness, can respond straightly to the machining process and, in some cases, is defined as a fingerprint of the manufacturing. When considering the high precision of surface topography studies, the definition of both S-surface and L-surface can drive many errors that influence the analysis of the accuracy of the manufacturing process. Even if precise measuring equipment (device and method) is provided but received data are processed erroneously, the precision is still lost. From that matter, the precise definition of the S-L surface can be valuable in the roughness evaluation allowing a reduction in the rejection of properly made parts. In this paper, it was proposed how to select an appropriate procedure for the removal of the L- and S- components from the raw measured data. Various types of surface topographies were considered, e.g., plateau-honed (some with burnished oil pockets), turned, milled, ground, laser-textured, ceramic, composite, and, generally, isotropic. They were measured with different (stylus and optical) methods, respectively, and parameters from the ISO 25178 standard were also taken into consideration. It was found that commonly used and available commercial software methods can be valuable and especially helpful in the precise definition of the S-L surface; respectively, its usage requires an appropriate response (knowledge) from the users.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-24
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113872
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113872
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051865
url https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113872
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051865
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1996-1944
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602579606536192