LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2019 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13852 |
Summary: | In this paper, we consider the use of a team of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to accomplish a search and rescue (SAR) mission in the minimum time possible while saving the maximum number of people. A novel technique for the SAR problem is proposed and referred to as the layered search and rescue (LSAR) algorithm. The novelty of LSAR involves simulating real disasters to distribute SAR tasks among UAVs. The performance of LSAR is compared, in terms of percentage of rescued survivors and rescue and execution times, with the max-sum, auction-based, and locust-inspired approaches for multi UAV task allocation (LIAM) and opportunistic task allocation (OTA) schemes. The simulation results show that the UAVs running the LSAR algorithm on average rescue approximately 74% of the survivors, which is 8% higher than the next best algorithm (LIAM). Moreover, this percentage increases with the number of UAVs, almost linearly with the least slope, which means more scalability and coverage is obtained in comparison to other algorithms. In addition, the empirical cumulative distribution function of LSAR results shows that the percentages of rescued survivors clustered around the [78% 100%] range under an exponential curve, meaning most results are above 50%. In comparison, all the other algorithms have almost equal distributions of their percentage of rescued survivor results. Furthermore, because the LSAR algorithm focuses on the center of the disaster, it nds more survivors and rescues them faster than the other algorithms, with an average of 55% 77%. Moreover, most registered times to rescue survivors by LSAR are bounded by a time of 04:50:02 with 95% con dence for a one-month mission time. |
id |
RCAP_95355ce80e1439f83b40bd79c84a78e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13852 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue MissionsAutonomous agentsDronesSearch and rescueUnmanned aerial vehiclesIn this paper, we consider the use of a team of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to accomplish a search and rescue (SAR) mission in the minimum time possible while saving the maximum number of people. A novel technique for the SAR problem is proposed and referred to as the layered search and rescue (LSAR) algorithm. The novelty of LSAR involves simulating real disasters to distribute SAR tasks among UAVs. The performance of LSAR is compared, in terms of percentage of rescued survivors and rescue and execution times, with the max-sum, auction-based, and locust-inspired approaches for multi UAV task allocation (LIAM) and opportunistic task allocation (OTA) schemes. The simulation results show that the UAVs running the LSAR algorithm on average rescue approximately 74% of the survivors, which is 8% higher than the next best algorithm (LIAM). Moreover, this percentage increases with the number of UAVs, almost linearly with the least slope, which means more scalability and coverage is obtained in comparison to other algorithms. In addition, the empirical cumulative distribution function of LSAR results shows that the percentages of rescued survivors clustered around the [78% 100%] range under an exponential curve, meaning most results are above 50%. In comparison, all the other algorithms have almost equal distributions of their percentage of rescued survivor results. Furthermore, because the LSAR algorithm focuses on the center of the disaster, it nds more survivors and rescues them faster than the other algorithms, with an average of 55% 77%. Moreover, most registered times to rescue survivors by LSAR are bounded by a time of 04:50:02 with 95% con dence for a one-month mission time.IEEEREPOSITÓRIO P.PORTOAlotaibi, Ebtehal TurkiSaleh Alqefari, ShahadKoubaa, Anis2019-06-06T09:07:23Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13852eng2169-353610.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912306info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-04-02T03:04:33Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13852Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:39:23.234370Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
title |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
spellingShingle |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions Alotaibi, Ebtehal Turki Autonomous agents Drones Search and rescue Unmanned aerial vehicles |
title_short |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
title_full |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
title_fullStr |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
title_full_unstemmed |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
title_sort |
LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions |
author |
Alotaibi, Ebtehal Turki |
author_facet |
Alotaibi, Ebtehal Turki Saleh Alqefari, Shahad Koubaa, Anis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Saleh Alqefari, Shahad Koubaa, Anis |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTO |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alotaibi, Ebtehal Turki Saleh Alqefari, Shahad Koubaa, Anis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autonomous agents Drones Search and rescue Unmanned aerial vehicles |
topic |
Autonomous agents Drones Search and rescue Unmanned aerial vehicles |
description |
In this paper, we consider the use of a team of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to accomplish a search and rescue (SAR) mission in the minimum time possible while saving the maximum number of people. A novel technique for the SAR problem is proposed and referred to as the layered search and rescue (LSAR) algorithm. The novelty of LSAR involves simulating real disasters to distribute SAR tasks among UAVs. The performance of LSAR is compared, in terms of percentage of rescued survivors and rescue and execution times, with the max-sum, auction-based, and locust-inspired approaches for multi UAV task allocation (LIAM) and opportunistic task allocation (OTA) schemes. The simulation results show that the UAVs running the LSAR algorithm on average rescue approximately 74% of the survivors, which is 8% higher than the next best algorithm (LIAM). Moreover, this percentage increases with the number of UAVs, almost linearly with the least slope, which means more scalability and coverage is obtained in comparison to other algorithms. In addition, the empirical cumulative distribution function of LSAR results shows that the percentages of rescued survivors clustered around the [78% 100%] range under an exponential curve, meaning most results are above 50%. In comparison, all the other algorithms have almost equal distributions of their percentage of rescued survivor results. Furthermore, because the LSAR algorithm focuses on the center of the disaster, it nds more survivors and rescues them faster than the other algorithms, with an average of 55% 77%. Moreover, most registered times to rescue survivors by LSAR are bounded by a time of 04:50:02 with 95% con dence for a one-month mission time. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-06T09:07:23Z 2019 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13852 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13852 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2169-3536 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912306 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IEEE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IEEE |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833600636471476224 |