Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gomes, DA
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Paiva, MS, Matos, D, Bello, AR, Rodrigues, G, Carmo, J, Ferreira, J, Moscoso Costa, F, Galvão Santos, P, Carmo, P, Cavaco, D, Bello Morgado, F, Adragão, P
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50751
Summary: Introduction and objectives: Catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity score matched population of ICM or NICM patients. Methods: Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. Results: The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3-3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank P=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32-4.14], P=0.004), NYHA class III/ IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11-4.04], P=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25-3.96], P=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence.
id RCAP_8d6aef5db57c213bfdcdbcf0e24f5527
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/50751
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysisCardiomiopatiasTaquicardia VentricularAblação por CateterCardiomyopathiesTachycardia, VentricularCatheter AblationIntroduction and objectives: Catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity score matched population of ICM or NICM patients. Methods: Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. Results: The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3-3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank P=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32-4.14], P=0.004), NYHA class III/ IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11-4.04], P=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25-3.96], P=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence.Repositório ComumGomes, DAPaiva, MSMatos, DBello, ARRodrigues, GCarmo, JFerreira, JMoscoso Costa, FGalvão Santos, PCarmo, PCavaco, DBello Morgado, FAdragão, P2024-05-01T22:34:16Z20242024-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50751eng10.1016/j.repc.2024.04.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-05-14T12:46:43Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/50751Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T07:18:37.009353Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
title Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
spellingShingle Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
Gomes, DA
Cardiomiopatias
Taquicardia Ventricular
Ablação por Cateter
Cardiomyopathies
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Catheter Ablation
title_short Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_full Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_sort Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matched analysis
author Gomes, DA
author_facet Gomes, DA
Paiva, MS
Matos, D
Bello, AR
Rodrigues, G
Carmo, J
Ferreira, J
Moscoso Costa, F
Galvão Santos, P
Carmo, P
Cavaco, D
Bello Morgado, F
Adragão, P
author_role author
author2 Paiva, MS
Matos, D
Bello, AR
Rodrigues, G
Carmo, J
Ferreira, J
Moscoso Costa, F
Galvão Santos, P
Carmo, P
Cavaco, D
Bello Morgado, F
Adragão, P
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, DA
Paiva, MS
Matos, D
Bello, AR
Rodrigues, G
Carmo, J
Ferreira, J
Moscoso Costa, F
Galvão Santos, P
Carmo, P
Cavaco, D
Bello Morgado, F
Adragão, P
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cardiomiopatias
Taquicardia Ventricular
Ablação por Cateter
Cardiomyopathies
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Catheter Ablation
topic Cardiomiopatias
Taquicardia Ventricular
Ablação por Cateter
Cardiomyopathies
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Catheter Ablation
description Introduction and objectives: Catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity score matched population of ICM or NICM patients. Methods: Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. Results: The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3-3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank P=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32-4.14], P=0.004), NYHA class III/ IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11-4.04], P=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25-3.96], P=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-01T22:34:16Z
2024
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50751
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50751
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.repc.2024.04.002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602946904883200