Export Ready — 

Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sobral, Sónia Rolland
Publication Date: 2021
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271
Summary: University rankings feature lists of higher education institutions ranked by item and weight. As they are available in the internet, they can be consulted by anyone wishing to find the best universities: students who want to enter higher education, teachers and researchers looking for new positions and governments/investors who want to fund the best. The lists are easy to consult and available to everyone. There are different classifications which are published: some are global, some are subdivided by areas, and others are only for one country. The results are very different from each other because they follow different systems. Many of the rankings have a huge number of Asian (mainly Chinese) universities in top positions while others consist mostly of American universities. This article compares the lists of computer science universities that appear in the rankings and analyzes the criteria for creating each of these rankings. Our goal is to understand why there are so many differences and which rankings favor each type of investigation. There is a direct relationship between the massive presence of top Asian universities and the total dependence on WebOfScience publications. The same is not true when the data source is the Scopus database.
id RCAP_87f1c0470bb784e19be2c74a515ed1d3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/3813
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?University rankingsComputer scienceWeb of ScienceScopusUniversity rankings feature lists of higher education institutions ranked by item and weight. As they are available in the internet, they can be consulted by anyone wishing to find the best universities: students who want to enter higher education, teachers and researchers looking for new positions and governments/investors who want to fund the best. The lists are easy to consult and available to everyone. There are different classifications which are published: some are global, some are subdivided by areas, and others are only for one country. The results are very different from each other because they follow different systems. Many of the rankings have a huge number of Asian (mainly Chinese) universities in top positions while others consist mostly of American universities. This article compares the lists of computer science universities that appear in the rankings and analyzes the criteria for creating each of these rankings. Our goal is to understand why there are so many differences and which rankings favor each type of investigation. There is a direct relationship between the massive presence of top Asian universities and the total dependence on WebOfScience publications. The same is not true when the data source is the Scopus database.2021-11-22T16:52:14Z2021-11-222021-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfSobral, S. R. (2021). Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 266-271. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813Sobral, S. R. (2021). Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 266-271. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271eng2377-2891 (Print)2377-2905 (Online)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobral, Sónia Rollandreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-04-24T02:04:11Zoai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/3813Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:29:41.667470Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
title Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
spellingShingle Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
Sobral, Sónia Rolland
University rankings
Computer science
Web of Science
Scopus
title_short Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
title_full Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
title_fullStr Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
title_full_unstemmed Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
title_sort Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?
author Sobral, Sónia Rolland
author_facet Sobral, Sónia Rolland
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sobral, Sónia Rolland
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv University rankings
Computer science
Web of Science
Scopus
topic University rankings
Computer science
Web of Science
Scopus
description University rankings feature lists of higher education institutions ranked by item and weight. As they are available in the internet, they can be consulted by anyone wishing to find the best universities: students who want to enter higher education, teachers and researchers looking for new positions and governments/investors who want to fund the best. The lists are easy to consult and available to everyone. There are different classifications which are published: some are global, some are subdivided by areas, and others are only for one country. The results are very different from each other because they follow different systems. Many of the rankings have a huge number of Asian (mainly Chinese) universities in top positions while others consist mostly of American universities. This article compares the lists of computer science universities that appear in the rankings and analyzes the criteria for creating each of these rankings. Our goal is to understand why there are so many differences and which rankings favor each type of investigation. There is a direct relationship between the massive presence of top Asian universities and the total dependence on WebOfScience publications. The same is not true when the data source is the Scopus database.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-22T16:52:14Z
2021-11-22
2021-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Sobral, S. R. (2021). Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 266-271. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
Sobral, S. R. (2021). Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 266-271. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271
identifier_str_mv Sobral, S. R. (2021). Why do Universities Rankings have Such Different Lists?. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 266-271. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3813
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.4.266-271
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2377-2891 (Print)
2377-2905 (Online)
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598134879518720