Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917 |
Resumo: | Several factors influence the behaviour of infilled frames, which have been a subject of research in the past with moderate success. The new generation of European design standards imposes the need to prevent brittle collapse of the infills and makes the structural engineer accountable for this requirement, yet it fails to provide sufficient information for masonry infills design. Therefore, the present work aims at understanding the seismic behaviour of masonry infill walls within reinforced concrete frames, using both unreinforced and reinforced solutions (bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster). For this purpose, three reinforced concrete buildings with different infill solutions were constructed at a scale of 1:1.5, all with the same geometry, and were tested on the shaking table of the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Portugal. All solutions performed adequately for the design earthquake, with no visible damage. Still, the experimental tests show that the double-leaf-unreinforced infill walls underperformed during a large earthquake, collapsing out of plane by rotating as rigid bodies with multiple configurations. Also the reinforced concrete buildings collapsed, because of the adverse interaction with the infill walls. The infill walls with bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster did not collapse out of plane, because of their connection to the concrete frame, which is an essential requirement. |
| id |
RCAP_83dcb710e3e70ab321f43ff3aa89f9cd |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/44917 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutionsMasonry infillsReinforced concrete frameBed joint reinforcementReinforced plasterShaking table testsEarthquake engineering.Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia CivilScience & TechnologySeveral factors influence the behaviour of infilled frames, which have been a subject of research in the past with moderate success. The new generation of European design standards imposes the need to prevent brittle collapse of the infills and makes the structural engineer accountable for this requirement, yet it fails to provide sufficient information for masonry infills design. Therefore, the present work aims at understanding the seismic behaviour of masonry infill walls within reinforced concrete frames, using both unreinforced and reinforced solutions (bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster). For this purpose, three reinforced concrete buildings with different infill solutions were constructed at a scale of 1:1.5, all with the same geometry, and were tested on the shaking table of the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Portugal. All solutions performed adequately for the design earthquake, with no visible damage. Still, the experimental tests show that the double-leaf-unreinforced infill walls underperformed during a large earthquake, collapsing out of plane by rotating as rigid bodies with multiple configurations. Also the reinforced concrete buildings collapsed, because of the adverse interaction with the infill walls. The infill walls with bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster did not collapse out of plane, because of their connection to the concrete frame, which is an essential requirement.WileyUniversidade do MinhoLourenço, Paulo B.Leite, João M.Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F.Campos-Costa, A.Candeias, P. X.Mendes, N.20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917engLourenço, P. B., Leite, J. M., Paulo-Pereira, M. F., Campos-Costa, A., Candeias, P. X., & Mendes, N. (2016). Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 45(14), 2241-2260. doi: 10.1002/eqe.27560098-88471096-984510.1002/eqe.2756info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T07:19:36Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/44917Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T16:23:17.840511Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| title |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| spellingShingle |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions Lourenço, Paulo B. Masonry infills Reinforced concrete frame Bed joint reinforcement Reinforced plaster Shaking table tests Earthquake engineering. Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil Science & Technology |
| title_short |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| title_full |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| title_fullStr |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| title_sort |
Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions |
| author |
Lourenço, Paulo B. |
| author_facet |
Lourenço, Paulo B. Leite, João M. Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F. Campos-Costa, A. Candeias, P. X. Mendes, N. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Leite, João M. Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F. Campos-Costa, A. Candeias, P. X. Mendes, N. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço, Paulo B. Leite, João M. Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F. Campos-Costa, A. Candeias, P. X. Mendes, N. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Masonry infills Reinforced concrete frame Bed joint reinforcement Reinforced plaster Shaking table tests Earthquake engineering. Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil Science & Technology |
| topic |
Masonry infills Reinforced concrete frame Bed joint reinforcement Reinforced plaster Shaking table tests Earthquake engineering. Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil Science & Technology |
| description |
Several factors influence the behaviour of infilled frames, which have been a subject of research in the past with moderate success. The new generation of European design standards imposes the need to prevent brittle collapse of the infills and makes the structural engineer accountable for this requirement, yet it fails to provide sufficient information for masonry infills design. Therefore, the present work aims at understanding the seismic behaviour of masonry infill walls within reinforced concrete frames, using both unreinforced and reinforced solutions (bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster). For this purpose, three reinforced concrete buildings with different infill solutions were constructed at a scale of 1:1.5, all with the same geometry, and were tested on the shaking table of the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Portugal. All solutions performed adequately for the design earthquake, with no visible damage. Still, the experimental tests show that the double-leaf-unreinforced infill walls underperformed during a large earthquake, collapsing out of plane by rotating as rigid bodies with multiple configurations. Also the reinforced concrete buildings collapsed, because of the adverse interaction with the infill walls. The infill walls with bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster did not collapse out of plane, because of their connection to the concrete frame, which is an essential requirement. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço, P. B., Leite, J. M., Paulo-Pereira, M. F., Campos-Costa, A., Candeias, P. X., & Mendes, N. (2016). Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 45(14), 2241-2260. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2756 0098-8847 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.2756 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833595913611771904 |