Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lourenço, Paulo B.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Leite, João M., Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F., Campos-Costa, A., Candeias, P. X., Mendes, N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917
Resumo: Several factors influence the behaviour of infilled frames, which have been a subject of research in the past with moderate success. The new generation of European design standards imposes the need to prevent brittle collapse of the infills and makes the structural engineer accountable for this requirement, yet it fails to provide sufficient information for masonry infills design. Therefore, the present work aims at understanding the seismic behaviour of masonry infill walls within reinforced concrete frames, using both unreinforced and reinforced solutions (bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster). For this purpose, three reinforced concrete buildings with different infill solutions were constructed at a scale of 1:1.5, all with the same geometry, and were tested on the shaking table of the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Portugal. All solutions performed adequately for the design earthquake, with no visible damage. Still, the experimental tests show that the double-leaf-unreinforced infill walls underperformed during a large earthquake, collapsing out of plane by rotating as rigid bodies with multiple configurations. Also the reinforced concrete buildings collapsed, because of the adverse interaction with the infill walls. The infill walls with bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster did not collapse out of plane, because of their connection to the concrete frame, which is an essential requirement.
id RCAP_83dcb710e3e70ab321f43ff3aa89f9cd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/44917
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutionsMasonry infillsReinforced concrete frameBed joint reinforcementReinforced plasterShaking table testsEarthquake engineering.Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia CivilScience & TechnologySeveral factors influence the behaviour of infilled frames, which have been a subject of research in the past with moderate success. The new generation of European design standards imposes the need to prevent brittle collapse of the infills and makes the structural engineer accountable for this requirement, yet it fails to provide sufficient information for masonry infills design. Therefore, the present work aims at understanding the seismic behaviour of masonry infill walls within reinforced concrete frames, using both unreinforced and reinforced solutions (bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster). For this purpose, three reinforced concrete buildings with different infill solutions were constructed at a scale of 1:1.5, all with the same geometry, and were tested on the shaking table of the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Portugal. All solutions performed adequately for the design earthquake, with no visible damage. Still, the experimental tests show that the double-leaf-unreinforced infill walls underperformed during a large earthquake, collapsing out of plane by rotating as rigid bodies with multiple configurations. Also the reinforced concrete buildings collapsed, because of the adverse interaction with the infill walls. The infill walls with bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster did not collapse out of plane, because of their connection to the concrete frame, which is an essential requirement.WileyUniversidade do MinhoLourenço, Paulo B.Leite, João M.Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F.Campos-Costa, A.Candeias, P. X.Mendes, N.20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917engLourenço, P. B., Leite, J. M., Paulo-Pereira, M. F., Campos-Costa, A., Candeias, P. X., & Mendes, N. (2016). Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 45(14), 2241-2260. doi: 10.1002/eqe.27560098-88471096-984510.1002/eqe.2756info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T07:19:36Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/44917Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T16:23:17.840511Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
title Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
spellingShingle Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
Lourenço, Paulo B.
Masonry infills
Reinforced concrete frame
Bed joint reinforcement
Reinforced plaster
Shaking table tests
Earthquake engineering.
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil
Science & Technology
title_short Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
title_full Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
title_fullStr Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
title_full_unstemmed Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
title_sort Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions
author Lourenço, Paulo B.
author_facet Lourenço, Paulo B.
Leite, João M.
Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F.
Campos-Costa, A.
Candeias, P. X.
Mendes, N.
author_role author
author2 Leite, João M.
Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F.
Campos-Costa, A.
Candeias, P. X.
Mendes, N.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lourenço, Paulo B.
Leite, João M.
Paulo-Pereira, Manuel F.
Campos-Costa, A.
Candeias, P. X.
Mendes, N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Masonry infills
Reinforced concrete frame
Bed joint reinforcement
Reinforced plaster
Shaking table tests
Earthquake engineering.
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil
Science & Technology
topic Masonry infills
Reinforced concrete frame
Bed joint reinforcement
Reinforced plaster
Shaking table tests
Earthquake engineering.
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil
Science & Technology
description Several factors influence the behaviour of infilled frames, which have been a subject of research in the past with moderate success. The new generation of European design standards imposes the need to prevent brittle collapse of the infills and makes the structural engineer accountable for this requirement, yet it fails to provide sufficient information for masonry infills design. Therefore, the present work aims at understanding the seismic behaviour of masonry infill walls within reinforced concrete frames, using both unreinforced and reinforced solutions (bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster). For this purpose, three reinforced concrete buildings with different infill solutions were constructed at a scale of 1:1.5, all with the same geometry, and were tested on the shaking table of the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Portugal. All solutions performed adequately for the design earthquake, with no visible damage. Still, the experimental tests show that the double-leaf-unreinforced infill walls underperformed during a large earthquake, collapsing out of plane by rotating as rigid bodies with multiple configurations. Also the reinforced concrete buildings collapsed, because of the adverse interaction with the infill walls. The infill walls with bed joint reinforcement and reinforced plaster did not collapse out of plane, because of their connection to the concrete frame, which is an essential requirement.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/44917
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Lourenço, P. B., Leite, J. M., Paulo-Pereira, M. F., Campos-Costa, A., Candeias, P. X., & Mendes, N. (2016). Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: unreinforced versus reinforced solutions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 45(14), 2241-2260. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2756
0098-8847
1096-9845
10.1002/eqe.2756
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833595913611771904