A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scarpetti, Giada
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Shadowen, Hannah, Williams, Gemma A., Winkelmann, Juliane, Kroneman, Madelon, Groenewegen, Peter P., De Jong, Judith D., Fronteira, Inês, Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo, Hsiung, Sonia, Slade, Siân, Rojatz, Daniela, Kallayova, Daniela, Katreniakova, Zuzana, Nagyova, Iveta, Kylänen, Marika, Vracko, Pia, Jesurasa, Amrita, Wallace, Zoe, Wallace, Carolyn, Costongs, Caroline, Barnes, Andrew J., van Ginneken, Ewout
Format: Other
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/169818
Summary: Funding Information: Different funding mechanisms have been exploited for social prescribing programs such as philanthropic funding, government funding, health insurance reimbursements, and research funds. In Australia, funding comes from a mixture of philanthropic and charitable organisations, as well as some state government funding. Similarly, in Canada funding sources differ based on the project with some funding from the provincial Ministry of Health and other funding from private donors/foundations. In Austria, social prescribing is funded by funding calls from the Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection. Similarly, in the US, most of the funding has been obtained through grants or research funds for randomized control trials, testing the effectiveness of social prescribing. Generally, health insurance companies do not provide these services in the US, although state Medicaid Managed Care Organizations have started to pay for link workers. Funding Information: Some countries pay for link workers through a salaried position. Starting in 2019, NHS England has paid 100% reimbursement of the salary of a full-time social prescribing link worker for every 13,000 patients. With this, link workers became salaried employees of primary care practices. In Germany, health insurances are the primary funder for link workers’ salaries (e.g., for Hamburg/Billstedt four large health insurance funds are partners). In Slovenia, health-related NGOs are funded by the Ministry of Health and/or municipalities, while primary health care services, including health promotion centers, are funded by the National Health Insurance Fund. Workers in the social sector are funded through the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. In Wales, most link workers are employed on fixed-term contracts paid for by the integrated care fund, GP cluster funding, health boards or local authorities [27] . The pilot project in Lapland, Finland, is funded by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. In Portugal, link workers’ salaries are funded through the budget allocated to the FHU and supported by the municipality, requiring no additional remuneration. Similarly, in the Netherlands, link workers are funded exclusively by municipalities. Publisher Copyright: © 2024
id RCAP_8347a95acca4c48c6bcb931eb0d3f6ab
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/169818
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countriesCommunity referralLink workerPerson-centred careSocial determinants of healthSocial prescribingHealth PolicySDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingFunding Information: Different funding mechanisms have been exploited for social prescribing programs such as philanthropic funding, government funding, health insurance reimbursements, and research funds. In Australia, funding comes from a mixture of philanthropic and charitable organisations, as well as some state government funding. Similarly, in Canada funding sources differ based on the project with some funding from the provincial Ministry of Health and other funding from private donors/foundations. In Austria, social prescribing is funded by funding calls from the Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection. Similarly, in the US, most of the funding has been obtained through grants or research funds for randomized control trials, testing the effectiveness of social prescribing. Generally, health insurance companies do not provide these services in the US, although state Medicaid Managed Care Organizations have started to pay for link workers. Funding Information: Some countries pay for link workers through a salaried position. Starting in 2019, NHS England has paid 100% reimbursement of the salary of a full-time social prescribing link worker for every 13,000 patients. With this, link workers became salaried employees of primary care practices. In Germany, health insurances are the primary funder for link workers’ salaries (e.g., for Hamburg/Billstedt four large health insurance funds are partners). In Slovenia, health-related NGOs are funded by the Ministry of Health and/or municipalities, while primary health care services, including health promotion centers, are funded by the National Health Insurance Fund. Workers in the social sector are funded through the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. In Wales, most link workers are employed on fixed-term contracts paid for by the integrated care fund, GP cluster funding, health boards or local authorities [27] . The pilot project in Lapland, Finland, is funded by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. In Portugal, link workers’ salaries are funded through the budget allocated to the FHU and supported by the municipality, requiring no additional remuneration. Similarly, in the Netherlands, link workers are funded exclusively by municipalities. Publisher Copyright: © 2024Background: Social prescribing connects patients with community resources to improve their health and well-being. It is gaining momentum globally due to its potential for addressing non-medical causes of illness while building on existing resources and enhancing overall health at a relatively low cost. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for policy interventions to address health-related social issues such as loneliness and isolation. Aim: This paper presents evidence of the conceptualisation and implementation of social prescribing schemes in twelve countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Finland, Germany, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the Netherlands, the United States and Wales. Methods: Twelve countries were identified through the Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HSPM) network and the EuroHealthNet Partnership. Information was collected through a twelve open-ended question survey based on a conceptual model inspired by the WHO's Health System Framework. Results: We found that social prescribing can take different forms, and the scale of implementation also varies significantly. Robust evidence on impact is scarce and highly context-specific, with some indications of cost-effectiveness and positive impact on well-being. Conclusions: This paper provides insights into social prescribing in various contexts and may guide countries interested in holistically tackling health-related social factors and strengthening community-based care. Policies can support a more seamless integration of social prescribing into existing care, improve collaboration among sectors and training programs for health and social care professionals.Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - Pólo ENSPEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM)RUNScarpetti, GiadaShadowen, HannahWilliams, Gemma A.Winkelmann, JulianeKroneman, MadelonGroenewegen, Peter P.De Jong, Judith D.Fronteira, InêsAugusto, Gonçalo FigueiredoHsiung, SoniaSlade, SiânRojatz, DanielaKallayova, DanielaKatreniakova, ZuzanaNagyova, IvetaKylänen, MarikaVracko, PiaJesurasa, AmritaWallace, ZoeWallace, CarolynCostongs, CarolineBarnes, Andrew J.van Ginneken, Ewout2024-07-19T22:23:17Z2024-042024-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/169818eng0168-8510PURE: 95551656https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-08-05T01:34:07Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/169818Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:38:12.232697Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
title A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
spellingShingle A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
Scarpetti, Giada
Community referral
Link worker
Person-centred care
Social determinants of health
Social prescribing
Health Policy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
title_short A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
title_full A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
title_fullStr A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
title_sort A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
author Scarpetti, Giada
author_facet Scarpetti, Giada
Shadowen, Hannah
Williams, Gemma A.
Winkelmann, Juliane
Kroneman, Madelon
Groenewegen, Peter P.
De Jong, Judith D.
Fronteira, Inês
Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo
Hsiung, Sonia
Slade, Siân
Rojatz, Daniela
Kallayova, Daniela
Katreniakova, Zuzana
Nagyova, Iveta
Kylänen, Marika
Vracko, Pia
Jesurasa, Amrita
Wallace, Zoe
Wallace, Carolyn
Costongs, Caroline
Barnes, Andrew J.
van Ginneken, Ewout
author_role author
author2 Shadowen, Hannah
Williams, Gemma A.
Winkelmann, Juliane
Kroneman, Madelon
Groenewegen, Peter P.
De Jong, Judith D.
Fronteira, Inês
Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo
Hsiung, Sonia
Slade, Siân
Rojatz, Daniela
Kallayova, Daniela
Katreniakova, Zuzana
Nagyova, Iveta
Kylänen, Marika
Vracko, Pia
Jesurasa, Amrita
Wallace, Zoe
Wallace, Carolyn
Costongs, Caroline
Barnes, Andrew J.
van Ginneken, Ewout
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - Pólo ENSP
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scarpetti, Giada
Shadowen, Hannah
Williams, Gemma A.
Winkelmann, Juliane
Kroneman, Madelon
Groenewegen, Peter P.
De Jong, Judith D.
Fronteira, Inês
Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo
Hsiung, Sonia
Slade, Siân
Rojatz, Daniela
Kallayova, Daniela
Katreniakova, Zuzana
Nagyova, Iveta
Kylänen, Marika
Vracko, Pia
Jesurasa, Amrita
Wallace, Zoe
Wallace, Carolyn
Costongs, Caroline
Barnes, Andrew J.
van Ginneken, Ewout
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Community referral
Link worker
Person-centred care
Social determinants of health
Social prescribing
Health Policy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
topic Community referral
Link worker
Person-centred care
Social determinants of health
Social prescribing
Health Policy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
description Funding Information: Different funding mechanisms have been exploited for social prescribing programs such as philanthropic funding, government funding, health insurance reimbursements, and research funds. In Australia, funding comes from a mixture of philanthropic and charitable organisations, as well as some state government funding. Similarly, in Canada funding sources differ based on the project with some funding from the provincial Ministry of Health and other funding from private donors/foundations. In Austria, social prescribing is funded by funding calls from the Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection. Similarly, in the US, most of the funding has been obtained through grants or research funds for randomized control trials, testing the effectiveness of social prescribing. Generally, health insurance companies do not provide these services in the US, although state Medicaid Managed Care Organizations have started to pay for link workers. Funding Information: Some countries pay for link workers through a salaried position. Starting in 2019, NHS England has paid 100% reimbursement of the salary of a full-time social prescribing link worker for every 13,000 patients. With this, link workers became salaried employees of primary care practices. In Germany, health insurances are the primary funder for link workers’ salaries (e.g., for Hamburg/Billstedt four large health insurance funds are partners). In Slovenia, health-related NGOs are funded by the Ministry of Health and/or municipalities, while primary health care services, including health promotion centers, are funded by the National Health Insurance Fund. Workers in the social sector are funded through the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. In Wales, most link workers are employed on fixed-term contracts paid for by the integrated care fund, GP cluster funding, health boards or local authorities [27] . The pilot project in Lapland, Finland, is funded by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. In Portugal, link workers’ salaries are funded through the budget allocated to the FHU and supported by the municipality, requiring no additional remuneration. Similarly, in the Netherlands, link workers are funded exclusively by municipalities. Publisher Copyright: © 2024
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-19T22:23:17Z
2024-04
2024-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format other
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/169818
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/169818
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0168-8510
PURE: 95551656
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597559512236032