Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Correia,Catarina
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Almeida,Nuno, Andrade,Raquel, Sant’Anna,Mariana, Macedo,Cláudia, Perdigoto,David, Gregório,Carlos, Figueiredo,Pedro Narra
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025
Summary: Abstract Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ±2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure.
id RCAP_82b0c22f1521fdc2e3488587c3e90a47
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2341-45452024000200025
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?Upper gastrointestinal endoscopyQuality standardsSedationAbstract Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ±2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure.Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia2024-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.31 n.2 2024reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025Correia,CatarinaAlmeida,NunoAndrade,RaquelSant’Anna,MarianaMacedo,CláudiaPerdigoto,DavidGregório,CarlosFigueiredo,Pedro Narrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-23T23:00:25Zoai:scielo:S2341-45452024000200025Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:52:11.211409Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
title Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
spellingShingle Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
Correia,Catarina
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Quality standards
Sedation
title_short Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
title_full Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
title_fullStr Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
title_full_unstemmed Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
title_sort Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
author Correia,Catarina
author_facet Correia,Catarina
Almeida,Nuno
Andrade,Raquel
Sant’Anna,Mariana
Macedo,Cláudia
Perdigoto,David
Gregório,Carlos
Figueiredo,Pedro Narra
author_role author
author2 Almeida,Nuno
Andrade,Raquel
Sant’Anna,Mariana
Macedo,Cláudia
Perdigoto,David
Gregório,Carlos
Figueiredo,Pedro Narra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Correia,Catarina
Almeida,Nuno
Andrade,Raquel
Sant’Anna,Mariana
Macedo,Cláudia
Perdigoto,David
Gregório,Carlos
Figueiredo,Pedro Narra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Quality standards
Sedation
topic Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Quality standards
Sedation
description Abstract Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ±2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.31 n.2 2024
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597023381618688