Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025 |
Summary: | Abstract Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ±2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure. |
id |
RCAP_82b0c22f1521fdc2e3488587c3e90a47 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2341-45452024000200025 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?Upper gastrointestinal endoscopyQuality standardsSedationAbstract Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ±2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure.Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia2024-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.31 n.2 2024reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025Correia,CatarinaAlmeida,NunoAndrade,RaquelSant’Anna,MarianaMacedo,CláudiaPerdigoto,DavidGregório,CarlosFigueiredo,Pedro Narrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-23T23:00:25Zoai:scielo:S2341-45452024000200025Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:52:11.211409Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
spellingShingle |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? Correia,Catarina Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Quality standards Sedation |
title_short |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_full |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_fullStr |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_sort |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
author |
Correia,Catarina |
author_facet |
Correia,Catarina Almeida,Nuno Andrade,Raquel Sant’Anna,Mariana Macedo,Cláudia Perdigoto,David Gregório,Carlos Figueiredo,Pedro Narra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida,Nuno Andrade,Raquel Sant’Anna,Mariana Macedo,Cláudia Perdigoto,David Gregório,Carlos Figueiredo,Pedro Narra |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correia,Catarina Almeida,Nuno Andrade,Raquel Sant’Anna,Mariana Macedo,Cláudia Perdigoto,David Gregório,Carlos Figueiredo,Pedro Narra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Quality standards Sedation |
topic |
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Quality standards Sedation |
description |
Abstract Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ±2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452024000200025 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.31 n.2 2024 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597023381618688 |