Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santos, Diana
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Pereira, Maria João, Oliveira, Ana Isabel, Pinho, Cláudia
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25781
Summary: The materials in which beverages are packed are crucial to maintain quality, nutritional properties, and safety of the final product. In what beer concerns, and even under optimal storage conditions, its quality deteriorates as the product approaches the expiration date, regardless of the container type in which it is packed. Therefore, a careful selection of packaging is imperative to maintain beer ́s integrity and quality, when tasted by the consumer. This work aims to discuss how the type of beer packaging influences the integrity and quality of this beverage during storage. A literature review was performed, using PubMed, b-on, and Web of Science databases. Articles related to the influence of packaging types on beer quality, in English, and published in the last 5 years were included. Plastic bottles (PB) proved to be the least suitable type of packaging for long-term storage, as beer exhibits significant changes in volatile compounds, turbidity, color, bitterness intensity, and decrease in CO2content, unlike glass bottles (GB), aluminum cans (AC), and stainless steel kegs (KG), where these parameters remain constant. Furthermore, Brown GB proved to be a more effective barrier against light compared to green GB and PB, as well as containing lower amounts of phthalates than beers in PB and AC. AC was capable of retaining all organoleptic characteristics, showing a slight increase in bitterness after 10 months of storage. However, beers stored in AC were characterized by higher aluminum contents compared to the products stored in glass bottles. The beer packaging material plays a crucial role in its quality. Thus, GB, AC and KG, due to their barrier characteristics and protection against external factors, generally outperform PB in preserving the integrity and quality of beer.
id RCAP_7e0cfc8a1f47ee42f9ebe51d1999f7da
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/25781
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Potential impact of packaging type material in beer qualityBeerPackaging materialQualityThe materials in which beverages are packed are crucial to maintain quality, nutritional properties, and safety of the final product. In what beer concerns, and even under optimal storage conditions, its quality deteriorates as the product approaches the expiration date, regardless of the container type in which it is packed. Therefore, a careful selection of packaging is imperative to maintain beer ́s integrity and quality, when tasted by the consumer. This work aims to discuss how the type of beer packaging influences the integrity and quality of this beverage during storage. A literature review was performed, using PubMed, b-on, and Web of Science databases. Articles related to the influence of packaging types on beer quality, in English, and published in the last 5 years were included. Plastic bottles (PB) proved to be the least suitable type of packaging for long-term storage, as beer exhibits significant changes in volatile compounds, turbidity, color, bitterness intensity, and decrease in CO2content, unlike glass bottles (GB), aluminum cans (AC), and stainless steel kegs (KG), where these parameters remain constant. Furthermore, Brown GB proved to be a more effective barrier against light compared to green GB and PB, as well as containing lower amounts of phthalates than beers in PB and AC. AC was capable of retaining all organoleptic characteristics, showing a slight increase in bitterness after 10 months of storage. However, beers stored in AC were characterized by higher aluminum contents compared to the products stored in glass bottles. The beer packaging material plays a crucial role in its quality. Thus, GB, AC and KG, due to their barrier characteristics and protection against external factors, generally outperform PB in preserving the integrity and quality of beer.CESPUREPOSITÓRIO P.PORTOSantos, DianaPereira, Maria JoãoOliveira, Ana IsabelPinho, Cláudia2024-07-11T13:50:34Z2024-052024-05-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25781eng2795-5117info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-07T10:03:34Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/25781Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:29:36.076607Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
title Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
spellingShingle Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
Santos, Diana
Beer
Packaging material
Quality
title_short Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
title_full Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
title_fullStr Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
title_full_unstemmed Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
title_sort Potential impact of packaging type material in beer quality
author Santos, Diana
author_facet Santos, Diana
Pereira, Maria João
Oliveira, Ana Isabel
Pinho, Cláudia
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Maria João
Oliveira, Ana Isabel
Pinho, Cláudia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTO
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Diana
Pereira, Maria João
Oliveira, Ana Isabel
Pinho, Cláudia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beer
Packaging material
Quality
topic Beer
Packaging material
Quality
description The materials in which beverages are packed are crucial to maintain quality, nutritional properties, and safety of the final product. In what beer concerns, and even under optimal storage conditions, its quality deteriorates as the product approaches the expiration date, regardless of the container type in which it is packed. Therefore, a careful selection of packaging is imperative to maintain beer ́s integrity and quality, when tasted by the consumer. This work aims to discuss how the type of beer packaging influences the integrity and quality of this beverage during storage. A literature review was performed, using PubMed, b-on, and Web of Science databases. Articles related to the influence of packaging types on beer quality, in English, and published in the last 5 years were included. Plastic bottles (PB) proved to be the least suitable type of packaging for long-term storage, as beer exhibits significant changes in volatile compounds, turbidity, color, bitterness intensity, and decrease in CO2content, unlike glass bottles (GB), aluminum cans (AC), and stainless steel kegs (KG), where these parameters remain constant. Furthermore, Brown GB proved to be a more effective barrier against light compared to green GB and PB, as well as containing lower amounts of phthalates than beers in PB and AC. AC was capable of retaining all organoleptic characteristics, showing a slight increase in bitterness after 10 months of storage. However, beers stored in AC were characterized by higher aluminum contents compared to the products stored in glass bottles. The beer packaging material plays a crucial role in its quality. Thus, GB, AC and KG, due to their barrier characteristics and protection against external factors, generally outperform PB in preserving the integrity and quality of beer.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-11T13:50:34Z
2024-05
2024-05-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25781
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25781
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2795-5117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CESPU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CESPU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600557785284608