Export Ready — 

Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duarte, Diogo
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Fonte, Cidália, Costa, Hugo, Caetano, Mário
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114030
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020490
Summary: This work presents a comparison between a global and a national land cover map, namely the ESA WorldCover 2020 (WC20) and the Portuguese use/land cover map (Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo 2018) (COS18). Such a comparison is relevant given the current amount of publicly available LULC products (either national or global) where such comparative studies enable a better understanding regarding different sets of LULC information and their production, focus and characteristics, especially when comparing authoritative maps built by national mapping agencies and global land cover focused products. Moreover, this comparison is also aimed at complementing the global validation report released with the WC20 product, which focused on global and continental level accuracy assessments, with no additional information for specific countries. The maps were compared by following a framework composed by four steps: (1) class nomenclature harmonization, (2) computing cross-tabulation matrices between WC20 and the Portuguese map, (3) determining the area occupied by each harmonized class in each data source, and (4) visual comparison between the maps to illustrate their differences focusing on Portuguese landscape details. Some of the differences were due to the different minimum mapping unit ofCOS18 and WC20, different nomenclatures and focuses on either land use or land cover. Overall, the results show that whileWC20 detail is able to distinguish small occurrences of artificial surfaces and grasslands within an urban environment,WC20 is often not able to distinguish sparse/individual trees from the neighboring cover, which is a common occurrence in the Portuguese landscape. While selecting a map, users should be aware that differences between maps can have a range of causes, such as scale, temporal reference, nomenclature and errors.
id RCAP_7c03f9899d9e5eef86a7cc8c8ed8aaf8
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/114030
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Mapland use land coverESA WorldCoverPortuguese authoritative thematic dataPortugalmap comparisonThis work presents a comparison between a global and a national land cover map, namely the ESA WorldCover 2020 (WC20) and the Portuguese use/land cover map (Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo 2018) (COS18). Such a comparison is relevant given the current amount of publicly available LULC products (either national or global) where such comparative studies enable a better understanding regarding different sets of LULC information and their production, focus and characteristics, especially when comparing authoritative maps built by national mapping agencies and global land cover focused products. Moreover, this comparison is also aimed at complementing the global validation report released with the WC20 product, which focused on global and continental level accuracy assessments, with no additional information for specific countries. The maps were compared by following a framework composed by four steps: (1) class nomenclature harmonization, (2) computing cross-tabulation matrices between WC20 and the Portuguese map, (3) determining the area occupied by each harmonized class in each data source, and (4) visual comparison between the maps to illustrate their differences focusing on Portuguese landscape details. Some of the differences were due to the different minimum mapping unit ofCOS18 and WC20, different nomenclatures and focuses on either land use or land cover. Overall, the results show that whileWC20 detail is able to distinguish small occurrences of artificial surfaces and grasslands within an urban environment,WC20 is often not able to distinguish sparse/individual trees from the neighboring cover, which is a common occurrence in the Portuguese landscape. While selecting a map, users should be aware that differences between maps can have a range of causes, such as scale, temporal reference, nomenclature and errors.MDPI2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/114030https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114030https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020490eng2073-445XDuarte, DiogoFonte, CidáliaCosta, HugoCaetano, Márioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-06-17T11:23:09Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/114030Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T06:06:53.223166Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
title Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
spellingShingle Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
Duarte, Diogo
land use land cover
ESA WorldCover
Portuguese authoritative thematic data
Portugal
map comparison
title_short Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
title_full Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
title_fullStr Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
title_full_unstemmed Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
title_sort Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map
author Duarte, Diogo
author_facet Duarte, Diogo
Fonte, Cidália
Costa, Hugo
Caetano, Mário
author_role author
author2 Fonte, Cidália
Costa, Hugo
Caetano, Mário
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, Diogo
Fonte, Cidália
Costa, Hugo
Caetano, Mário
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv land use land cover
ESA WorldCover
Portuguese authoritative thematic data
Portugal
map comparison
topic land use land cover
ESA WorldCover
Portuguese authoritative thematic data
Portugal
map comparison
description This work presents a comparison between a global and a national land cover map, namely the ESA WorldCover 2020 (WC20) and the Portuguese use/land cover map (Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo 2018) (COS18). Such a comparison is relevant given the current amount of publicly available LULC products (either national or global) where such comparative studies enable a better understanding regarding different sets of LULC information and their production, focus and characteristics, especially when comparing authoritative maps built by national mapping agencies and global land cover focused products. Moreover, this comparison is also aimed at complementing the global validation report released with the WC20 product, which focused on global and continental level accuracy assessments, with no additional information for specific countries. The maps were compared by following a framework composed by four steps: (1) class nomenclature harmonization, (2) computing cross-tabulation matrices between WC20 and the Portuguese map, (3) determining the area occupied by each harmonized class in each data source, and (4) visual comparison between the maps to illustrate their differences focusing on Portuguese landscape details. Some of the differences were due to the different minimum mapping unit ofCOS18 and WC20, different nomenclatures and focuses on either land use or land cover. Overall, the results show that whileWC20 detail is able to distinguish small occurrences of artificial surfaces and grasslands within an urban environment,WC20 is often not able to distinguish sparse/individual trees from the neighboring cover, which is a common occurrence in the Portuguese landscape. While selecting a map, users should be aware that differences between maps can have a range of causes, such as scale, temporal reference, nomenclature and errors.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114030
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114030
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020490
url https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114030
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020490
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2073-445X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602580461125632