Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morais, Carlos Bizarro
Publication Date: 2021
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33490
Summary: Across the works of Mikel Dufrenne, the category of intimacy occurs almost always as a way to heighten the attributes of reciprocity, sharing, close friendship and communion of feelings which shape the bond between spectator and aesthetical object or artwork at the core of the aesthetic experience. In this sense, intimacy is a reticular concept, interchangeable with “profoundness”, “interiority”, “connaturality”. Hence, the aesthetic experience is, in a way, a zenith of intimacy, a paradigm of “intimate life”, namely, the moment where spectator, artist and the work disrobe and reveal themselves – in other words, when they mutually share the complicit removal of the veils concealing them. However, contrary to what such openness could suggest, the intimacy experienced herein does not designate a secret event, not even a private slice of the above actors’ hidden life. Intimacy is not placed in the domain of “intimism”, of particular affection, which a certain psychoanalysis tends to highlight. Converting intimacy into a pretext or grounds for a clinic, psychoanalytic function is of no interest to Mikel Dufrenne, as it corrupts the very aesthetic process. In this interpretative context, we intend, first and foremost, to consider the theoretical implications of Mikel Dufrenne’s proposal about the theme of intimacy. We also intend to demonstrate that, by shielding the category of intimacy from the quite frequent risks of instrumentalisation, intimacy becomes available to assist in renovating the meaning of overarching phenomenological themes, such as intentionality and constitution. We also aim at illustrating how the aesthetic experience is a naturally intimate relationship, bestowing it with an ontological dimension from the very beginning. Following on this interpretation, quite beyond what the author made explicit, we wish to contribute to the proper critical appraisal of the thought of one of the greatest aesthetic philosophers - Mikel Dufrenne.
id RCAP_74686b766f8a6667fca3a02145e2cdcc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/33490
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel DufrennePara uma estética da intimidade. Crítica de Mikel DufrenneAestheticsIntimacyMikel DufrenneAesthetic experienceEstéticaIntimidadeExperiência estéticaAcross the works of Mikel Dufrenne, the category of intimacy occurs almost always as a way to heighten the attributes of reciprocity, sharing, close friendship and communion of feelings which shape the bond between spectator and aesthetical object or artwork at the core of the aesthetic experience. In this sense, intimacy is a reticular concept, interchangeable with “profoundness”, “interiority”, “connaturality”. Hence, the aesthetic experience is, in a way, a zenith of intimacy, a paradigm of “intimate life”, namely, the moment where spectator, artist and the work disrobe and reveal themselves – in other words, when they mutually share the complicit removal of the veils concealing them. However, contrary to what such openness could suggest, the intimacy experienced herein does not designate a secret event, not even a private slice of the above actors’ hidden life. Intimacy is not placed in the domain of “intimism”, of particular affection, which a certain psychoanalysis tends to highlight. Converting intimacy into a pretext or grounds for a clinic, psychoanalytic function is of no interest to Mikel Dufrenne, as it corrupts the very aesthetic process. In this interpretative context, we intend, first and foremost, to consider the theoretical implications of Mikel Dufrenne’s proposal about the theme of intimacy. We also intend to demonstrate that, by shielding the category of intimacy from the quite frequent risks of instrumentalisation, intimacy becomes available to assist in renovating the meaning of overarching phenomenological themes, such as intentionality and constitution. We also aim at illustrating how the aesthetic experience is a naturally intimate relationship, bestowing it with an ontological dimension from the very beginning. Following on this interpretation, quite beyond what the author made explicit, we wish to contribute to the proper critical appraisal of the thought of one of the greatest aesthetic philosophers - Mikel Dufrenne.Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa (CFUL)VeritatiMorais, Carlos Bizarro2021-06-08T09:27:55Z2021-05-262021-05-26T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33490eng9789898553522info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-13T16:20:21Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/33490Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T02:19:52.066838Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
Para uma estética da intimidade. Crítica de Mikel Dufrenne
title Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
spellingShingle Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
Morais, Carlos Bizarro
Aesthetics
Intimacy
Mikel Dufrenne
Aesthetic experience
Estética
Intimidade
Experiência estética
title_short Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
title_full Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
title_fullStr Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
title_full_unstemmed Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
title_sort Towards an aesthetic of intimacy. A contribution to the critique of Mikel Dufrenne
author Morais, Carlos Bizarro
author_facet Morais, Carlos Bizarro
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morais, Carlos Bizarro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aesthetics
Intimacy
Mikel Dufrenne
Aesthetic experience
Estética
Intimidade
Experiência estética
topic Aesthetics
Intimacy
Mikel Dufrenne
Aesthetic experience
Estética
Intimidade
Experiência estética
description Across the works of Mikel Dufrenne, the category of intimacy occurs almost always as a way to heighten the attributes of reciprocity, sharing, close friendship and communion of feelings which shape the bond between spectator and aesthetical object or artwork at the core of the aesthetic experience. In this sense, intimacy is a reticular concept, interchangeable with “profoundness”, “interiority”, “connaturality”. Hence, the aesthetic experience is, in a way, a zenith of intimacy, a paradigm of “intimate life”, namely, the moment where spectator, artist and the work disrobe and reveal themselves – in other words, when they mutually share the complicit removal of the veils concealing them. However, contrary to what such openness could suggest, the intimacy experienced herein does not designate a secret event, not even a private slice of the above actors’ hidden life. Intimacy is not placed in the domain of “intimism”, of particular affection, which a certain psychoanalysis tends to highlight. Converting intimacy into a pretext or grounds for a clinic, psychoanalytic function is of no interest to Mikel Dufrenne, as it corrupts the very aesthetic process. In this interpretative context, we intend, first and foremost, to consider the theoretical implications of Mikel Dufrenne’s proposal about the theme of intimacy. We also intend to demonstrate that, by shielding the category of intimacy from the quite frequent risks of instrumentalisation, intimacy becomes available to assist in renovating the meaning of overarching phenomenological themes, such as intentionality and constitution. We also aim at illustrating how the aesthetic experience is a naturally intimate relationship, bestowing it with an ontological dimension from the very beginning. Following on this interpretation, quite beyond what the author made explicit, we wish to contribute to the proper critical appraisal of the thought of one of the greatest aesthetic philosophers - Mikel Dufrenne.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-08T09:27:55Z
2021-05-26
2021-05-26T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33490
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33490
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 9789898553522
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa (CFUL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa (CFUL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833601313473036288