Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Almeida-Santos, Ana C.
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Tedim, Ana P., Duarte, Bárbara, Brilhante, Michael, Coque, Teresa M., Novais, Carla, Freitas, Ana R., Peixe, Luísa
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.131
Summary: Background: Enterococcus faecium-Efm and E.lactis-Elts (former Efm-cladeB) colonize the human gut, with Efm also being a leading hospital-pathogen. Dynamics influencing strain dominance in competitive environments (e.g., infection/colonization) are not fully understood, but bacteriocins may provide competitive advantage to clinical Efm or commensal Elts strains. Objective: We explored bacteriocin content of contemporary Efm and Elts, isolated from healthy/diseased humans, and correlated it with their inhibition profiles against strains across these species. Methods: A collection of 129 strains [91 clinical-Efm (77 vancomycin-resistant-VRE); 35 healthy-volunteers (21-Efm;14-Elts)] from 1996-2022 were challenged against each other by a qualitative bacteriocin production/sensitivity-assay (soft-agar-overlay-technique). Eighty-eight representatives were sequenced (Illumina-NovaSeq) to establish clonality, antibiotic profiles (CGE-tool), and bacteriocins (homemade-database) [1]. Results: Elts (93%) and Efm (87%) carried ≥ 1 bacteriocin. Twenty-one bacteriocins were found, including 8 newly identified. Efm exhibited greater diversity (1-9; x̄=3.6 vs 1-5; x̄=2.6) and both species presented exclusive bacteriocin genes (Efm:bac43/AS5/AS9/enxA/B/entB; Elts:entL50A/B/GM-1). Bacteriocins 43/AS5/AS11/AS9/entA were significantly associated with clinical-Efm-strains (p<0.05), whereas AS8/bac32/entQ/AS4/entl50A/B/GM-1 were exclusive to commensal ones. All were susceptible to inhibition, while 53% of Elts and 65% of Efm (clinical-50%; commensal-39%) inhibited ≥ 1 strain. Those unable to inhibit others were mostly recovered < 2007 or lacked bac43. More bacteriocin genes correlated with less inhibition, and similar profiles resulted in comparable inhibition patterns. Among clinical isolates, ST117, ST78 and ST80 showed a higher inhibitory spectrum. ST78-related strains, particularly ST117, demonstrated activity against ST18-related strains previously dominant in Portuguese hospitals, but not vice-versa. VRE were inhibited by 26% of commensal-strains (Efm/Elts with diverse profiles/STs), while inhibiting up to 85% of them. Conclusions: Distinct bacteriocin profiles in clinical/commensal isolates, coupled with strain-specific and/or mutual strain inhibition dynamics, suggest a competitive landscape for Efm. Commensal strains inhibited VRE, showcasing their potential to counteract resistant strains. This delicate balance, influenced by unknown factors, underscores the valuable insights bacteriocins could provide for future eco-evo strategies combating human infections caused by Efm.
id RCAP_6eb8983074d78596c2976a02a0ea35ff
oai_identifier_str oai:publicacoes.cespu.pt:article/131
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactionsSelected Oral CommunicationBackground: Enterococcus faecium-Efm and E.lactis-Elts (former Efm-cladeB) colonize the human gut, with Efm also being a leading hospital-pathogen. Dynamics influencing strain dominance in competitive environments (e.g., infection/colonization) are not fully understood, but bacteriocins may provide competitive advantage to clinical Efm or commensal Elts strains. Objective: We explored bacteriocin content of contemporary Efm and Elts, isolated from healthy/diseased humans, and correlated it with their inhibition profiles against strains across these species. Methods: A collection of 129 strains [91 clinical-Efm (77 vancomycin-resistant-VRE); 35 healthy-volunteers (21-Efm;14-Elts)] from 1996-2022 were challenged against each other by a qualitative bacteriocin production/sensitivity-assay (soft-agar-overlay-technique). Eighty-eight representatives were sequenced (Illumina-NovaSeq) to establish clonality, antibiotic profiles (CGE-tool), and bacteriocins (homemade-database) [1]. Results: Elts (93%) and Efm (87%) carried ≥ 1 bacteriocin. Twenty-one bacteriocins were found, including 8 newly identified. Efm exhibited greater diversity (1-9; x̄=3.6 vs 1-5; x̄=2.6) and both species presented exclusive bacteriocin genes (Efm:bac43/AS5/AS9/enxA/B/entB; Elts:entL50A/B/GM-1). Bacteriocins 43/AS5/AS11/AS9/entA were significantly associated with clinical-Efm-strains (p<0.05), whereas AS8/bac32/entQ/AS4/entl50A/B/GM-1 were exclusive to commensal ones. All were susceptible to inhibition, while 53% of Elts and 65% of Efm (clinical-50%; commensal-39%) inhibited ≥ 1 strain. Those unable to inhibit others were mostly recovered < 2007 or lacked bac43. More bacteriocin genes correlated with less inhibition, and similar profiles resulted in comparable inhibition patterns. Among clinical isolates, ST117, ST78 and ST80 showed a higher inhibitory spectrum. ST78-related strains, particularly ST117, demonstrated activity against ST18-related strains previously dominant in Portuguese hospitals, but not vice-versa. VRE were inhibited by 26% of commensal-strains (Efm/Elts with diverse profiles/STs), while inhibiting up to 85% of them. Conclusions: Distinct bacteriocin profiles in clinical/commensal isolates, coupled with strain-specific and/or mutual strain inhibition dynamics, suggest a competitive landscape for Efm. Commensal strains inhibited VRE, showcasing their potential to counteract resistant strains. This delicate balance, influenced by unknown factors, underscores the valuable insights bacteriocins could provide for future eco-evo strategies combating human infections caused by Efm.IUCS-CESPU Publishing2024-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.131https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.131Scientific Letters; Vol. 1 No. Sup 1 (2024)2795-5117reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/131https://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/131/143Copyright (c) 2024 Ana C. Almeida-Santos, Ana P. Tedim, Bárbara Duarte, Michael Brilhante, Teresa M. Coque, Carla Novais, Ana R. Freitas, Luísa Peixeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida-Santos, Ana C.Tedim, Ana P.Duarte, BárbaraBrilhante, MichaelCoque, Teresa M.Novais, CarlaFreitas, Ana R.Peixe, Luísa2024-05-04T08:46:25Zoai:publicacoes.cespu.pt:article/131Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:34:02.872168Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
title Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
spellingShingle Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
Almeida-Santos, Ana C.
Selected Oral Communication
title_short Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
title_full Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
title_fullStr Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
title_full_unstemmed Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
title_sort Bacteriocin dynamics in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis: implications for clinical and commensal strain interactions
author Almeida-Santos, Ana C.
author_facet Almeida-Santos, Ana C.
Tedim, Ana P.
Duarte, Bárbara
Brilhante, Michael
Coque, Teresa M.
Novais, Carla
Freitas, Ana R.
Peixe, Luísa
author_role author
author2 Tedim, Ana P.
Duarte, Bárbara
Brilhante, Michael
Coque, Teresa M.
Novais, Carla
Freitas, Ana R.
Peixe, Luísa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida-Santos, Ana C.
Tedim, Ana P.
Duarte, Bárbara
Brilhante, Michael
Coque, Teresa M.
Novais, Carla
Freitas, Ana R.
Peixe, Luísa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Selected Oral Communication
topic Selected Oral Communication
description Background: Enterococcus faecium-Efm and E.lactis-Elts (former Efm-cladeB) colonize the human gut, with Efm also being a leading hospital-pathogen. Dynamics influencing strain dominance in competitive environments (e.g., infection/colonization) are not fully understood, but bacteriocins may provide competitive advantage to clinical Efm or commensal Elts strains. Objective: We explored bacteriocin content of contemporary Efm and Elts, isolated from healthy/diseased humans, and correlated it with their inhibition profiles against strains across these species. Methods: A collection of 129 strains [91 clinical-Efm (77 vancomycin-resistant-VRE); 35 healthy-volunteers (21-Efm;14-Elts)] from 1996-2022 were challenged against each other by a qualitative bacteriocin production/sensitivity-assay (soft-agar-overlay-technique). Eighty-eight representatives were sequenced (Illumina-NovaSeq) to establish clonality, antibiotic profiles (CGE-tool), and bacteriocins (homemade-database) [1]. Results: Elts (93%) and Efm (87%) carried ≥ 1 bacteriocin. Twenty-one bacteriocins were found, including 8 newly identified. Efm exhibited greater diversity (1-9; x̄=3.6 vs 1-5; x̄=2.6) and both species presented exclusive bacteriocin genes (Efm:bac43/AS5/AS9/enxA/B/entB; Elts:entL50A/B/GM-1). Bacteriocins 43/AS5/AS11/AS9/entA were significantly associated with clinical-Efm-strains (p<0.05), whereas AS8/bac32/entQ/AS4/entl50A/B/GM-1 were exclusive to commensal ones. All were susceptible to inhibition, while 53% of Elts and 65% of Efm (clinical-50%; commensal-39%) inhibited ≥ 1 strain. Those unable to inhibit others were mostly recovered < 2007 or lacked bac43. More bacteriocin genes correlated with less inhibition, and similar profiles resulted in comparable inhibition patterns. Among clinical isolates, ST117, ST78 and ST80 showed a higher inhibitory spectrum. ST78-related strains, particularly ST117, demonstrated activity against ST18-related strains previously dominant in Portuguese hospitals, but not vice-versa. VRE were inhibited by 26% of commensal-strains (Efm/Elts with diverse profiles/STs), while inhibiting up to 85% of them. Conclusions: Distinct bacteriocin profiles in clinical/commensal isolates, coupled with strain-specific and/or mutual strain inhibition dynamics, suggest a competitive landscape for Efm. Commensal strains inhibited VRE, showcasing their potential to counteract resistant strains. This delicate balance, influenced by unknown factors, underscores the valuable insights bacteriocins could provide for future eco-evo strategies combating human infections caused by Efm.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.131
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.131
url https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.131
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/131
https://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/131/143
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IUCS-CESPU Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IUCS-CESPU Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Letters; Vol. 1 No. Sup 1 (2024)
2795-5117
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593876414201856