Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ferreira,Hugo
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Diniz,Hugo, Martins,Patrícia, Coentrão,Luís
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000100003
Summary: The cohort of older age pre-dialysis patients is growing steadily. However, “Fistula First” may not always be the best strategy due to poorer arteriovenous fistula outcomes in this population. This retrospective cohort study included data from 157 predialysis patients who underwent fistula placement in our centre. Their mean age was 68.1±12.4 years. 64.3% were male and 53.5% were diabetic. The median nephrology follow-up was 3.04 years (IQR: 0.95-5.17). Two groups were created based on patient’s age at fistula placement: <75 years (n=102) and ≥75 years (n=55). Further analysis is shown, for the younger group vs. the elderly group, respectively. The groups differed only in smoking history (29.4% versus 12.7%, p=0.019) and in hypertensive (3.9% versus 23.6%, p<0.001) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease aetiologies (13.7% versus 0%, p=0.004). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at referral for fistula placement was 16.1±4.3 vs. 14.5±4.0ml/min/1.73m2 (p=0.026). Primary fistula failure occurred in 17.6% vs. 32.7%, p=0.032 (RR 1.85 [1.05-3.26]): in 4.9% vs. 5.5% due to thrombosis (p=0.881), in 12.7% vs. 25.5% due to maturation failure (p=0.044; RR 2.0 [1.01-3,94]) and in 2.0% vs. 1.8% due to complications which lead to surgical closure (p=1). During the follow-up period, 52.0% vs. 43.6% patients started hemodialysis (p=0.32). Of these patients, 79.2% vs. 50.0% started hemodialysis with a functioning fistula, p=0.009 (RR 0.63 [0.41-0.96]) while the remaining needed a central venous catheter (RR 2.41 [1.24-4.67]). In multivariate analysis, age ≥75 years and the number of previous fistulawere predictors of failure: OR 3.70 (CI: 1.37-9.98) and 11.65 (CI: 5.04-26.93), respectively. In conclusion, elderly patients had more primary fistula failure. The need of central venous catheter due to non-functioning fistula at time of dialysis initiation was higher in the elderly. Older age (≥ 75 years) and the number of previously placed fistulas seem to predict fistula failure
id RCAP_6cf07e82eaf5d3816e7571b5985c0b22
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-01692018000100003
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohortArteriovenous fistulahemodialysiselderlyThe cohort of older age pre-dialysis patients is growing steadily. However, “Fistula First” may not always be the best strategy due to poorer arteriovenous fistula outcomes in this population. This retrospective cohort study included data from 157 predialysis patients who underwent fistula placement in our centre. Their mean age was 68.1±12.4 years. 64.3% were male and 53.5% were diabetic. The median nephrology follow-up was 3.04 years (IQR: 0.95-5.17). Two groups were created based on patient’s age at fistula placement: <75 years (n=102) and ≥75 years (n=55). Further analysis is shown, for the younger group vs. the elderly group, respectively. The groups differed only in smoking history (29.4% versus 12.7%, p=0.019) and in hypertensive (3.9% versus 23.6%, p<0.001) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease aetiologies (13.7% versus 0%, p=0.004). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at referral for fistula placement was 16.1±4.3 vs. 14.5±4.0ml/min/1.73m2 (p=0.026). Primary fistula failure occurred in 17.6% vs. 32.7%, p=0.032 (RR 1.85 [1.05-3.26]): in 4.9% vs. 5.5% due to thrombosis (p=0.881), in 12.7% vs. 25.5% due to maturation failure (p=0.044; RR 2.0 [1.01-3,94]) and in 2.0% vs. 1.8% due to complications which lead to surgical closure (p=1). During the follow-up period, 52.0% vs. 43.6% patients started hemodialysis (p=0.32). Of these patients, 79.2% vs. 50.0% started hemodialysis with a functioning fistula, p=0.009 (RR 0.63 [0.41-0.96]) while the remaining needed a central venous catheter (RR 2.41 [1.24-4.67]). In multivariate analysis, age ≥75 years and the number of previous fistulawere predictors of failure: OR 3.70 (CI: 1.37-9.98) and 11.65 (CI: 5.04-26.93), respectively. In conclusion, elderly patients had more primary fistula failure. The need of central venous catheter due to non-functioning fistula at time of dialysis initiation was higher in the elderly. Older age (≥ 75 years) and the number of previously placed fistulas seem to predict fistula failureSociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000100003Portuguese Journal of Nephrology &amp; Hypertension v.32 n.1 2018reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000100003Ferreira,HugoDiniz,HugoMartins,PatríciaCoentrão,Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:04:57Zoai:scielo:S0872-01692018000100003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T12:54:31.300331Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
title Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
spellingShingle Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
Ferreira,Hugo
Arteriovenous fistula
hemodialysis
elderly
title_short Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
title_full Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
title_fullStr Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
title_full_unstemmed Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
title_sort Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula outcomes in elderly patients: a single-centre cohort
author Ferreira,Hugo
author_facet Ferreira,Hugo
Diniz,Hugo
Martins,Patrícia
Coentrão,Luís
author_role author
author2 Diniz,Hugo
Martins,Patrícia
Coentrão,Luís
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Hugo
Diniz,Hugo
Martins,Patrícia
Coentrão,Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arteriovenous fistula
hemodialysis
elderly
topic Arteriovenous fistula
hemodialysis
elderly
description The cohort of older age pre-dialysis patients is growing steadily. However, “Fistula First” may not always be the best strategy due to poorer arteriovenous fistula outcomes in this population. This retrospective cohort study included data from 157 predialysis patients who underwent fistula placement in our centre. Their mean age was 68.1±12.4 years. 64.3% were male and 53.5% were diabetic. The median nephrology follow-up was 3.04 years (IQR: 0.95-5.17). Two groups were created based on patient’s age at fistula placement: <75 years (n=102) and ≥75 years (n=55). Further analysis is shown, for the younger group vs. the elderly group, respectively. The groups differed only in smoking history (29.4% versus 12.7%, p=0.019) and in hypertensive (3.9% versus 23.6%, p<0.001) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease aetiologies (13.7% versus 0%, p=0.004). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at referral for fistula placement was 16.1±4.3 vs. 14.5±4.0ml/min/1.73m2 (p=0.026). Primary fistula failure occurred in 17.6% vs. 32.7%, p=0.032 (RR 1.85 [1.05-3.26]): in 4.9% vs. 5.5% due to thrombosis (p=0.881), in 12.7% vs. 25.5% due to maturation failure (p=0.044; RR 2.0 [1.01-3,94]) and in 2.0% vs. 1.8% due to complications which lead to surgical closure (p=1). During the follow-up period, 52.0% vs. 43.6% patients started hemodialysis (p=0.32). Of these patients, 79.2% vs. 50.0% started hemodialysis with a functioning fistula, p=0.009 (RR 0.63 [0.41-0.96]) while the remaining needed a central venous catheter (RR 2.41 [1.24-4.67]). In multivariate analysis, age ≥75 years and the number of previous fistulawere predictors of failure: OR 3.70 (CI: 1.37-9.98) and 11.65 (CI: 5.04-26.93), respectively. In conclusion, elderly patients had more primary fistula failure. The need of central venous catheter due to non-functioning fistula at time of dialysis initiation was higher in the elderly. Older age (≥ 75 years) and the number of previously placed fistulas seem to predict fistula failure
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000100003
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000100003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000100003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Nephrology &amp; Hypertension v.32 n.1 2018
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593238494117888