A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Timmins, Fiona
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Caldeira, Sílvia, Naughton, Margaret Theresa, Plakas, Sotirios, Koenig, Harold G.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841
Resumo: King’s publication based on a key note presentation at the 2014 British Association of theStudy of Spirituality (BASS) conference, a well written and thought provoking paper, leads us toconsider the contribution of this critique of spirituality research to contemporary debates on the topicThe views expressed within the paper are important and foster debate about the validity of researchin the field of spirituality and religion. However, at the same time, this debate is reminiscent of thenegative responses sometimes expressed about research publications in this field. At the same time,it must be recognised that there is a view held that there is an extra yard stick required for researchersin this field, who can be subjected to much higher standards and expectations than other researcherssimply because of the topic and the deep seated conflicting views that advocates and critics hold.This paper considers the merits and challenges of this paper in light of this.
id RCAP_6ac68dde9cba363148d2608e3e7f0d1d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/33841
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20SpiritualityReligionEvidence-based practiceKing’s publication based on a key note presentation at the 2014 British Association of theStudy of Spirituality (BASS) conference, a well written and thought provoking paper, leads us toconsider the contribution of this critique of spirituality research to contemporary debates on the topicThe views expressed within the paper are important and foster debate about the validity of researchin the field of spirituality and religion. However, at the same time, this debate is reminiscent of thenegative responses sometimes expressed about research publications in this field. At the same time,it must be recognised that there is a view held that there is an extra yard stick required for researchersin this field, who can be subjected to much higher standards and expectations than other researcherssimply because of the topic and the deep seated conflicting views that advocates and critics hold.This paper considers the merits and challenges of this paper in light of this.VeritatiTimmins, FionaCaldeira, SílviaNaughton, Margaret TheresaPlakas, SotiriosKoenig, Harold G.2021-06-22T11:44:22Z2016-04-122016-04-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841eng2077-144410.3390/rel7040039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-13T13:44:19Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/33841Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:59:19.103097Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
title A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
spellingShingle A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
Timmins, Fiona
Spirituality
Religion
Evidence-based practice
title_short A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
title_full A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
title_fullStr A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
title_full_unstemmed A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
title_sort A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
author Timmins, Fiona
author_facet Timmins, Fiona
Caldeira, Sílvia
Naughton, Margaret Theresa
Plakas, Sotirios
Koenig, Harold G.
author_role author
author2 Caldeira, Sílvia
Naughton, Margaret Theresa
Plakas, Sotirios
Koenig, Harold G.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Timmins, Fiona
Caldeira, Sílvia
Naughton, Margaret Theresa
Plakas, Sotirios
Koenig, Harold G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spirituality
Religion
Evidence-based practice
topic Spirituality
Religion
Evidence-based practice
description King’s publication based on a key note presentation at the 2014 British Association of theStudy of Spirituality (BASS) conference, a well written and thought provoking paper, leads us toconsider the contribution of this critique of spirituality research to contemporary debates on the topicThe views expressed within the paper are important and foster debate about the validity of researchin the field of spirituality and religion. However, at the same time, this debate is reminiscent of thenegative responses sometimes expressed about research publications in this field. At the same time,it must be recognised that there is a view held that there is an extra yard stick required for researchersin this field, who can be subjected to much higher standards and expectations than other researcherssimply because of the topic and the deep seated conflicting views that advocates and critics hold.This paper considers the merits and challenges of this paper in light of this.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-12
2016-04-12T00:00:00Z
2021-06-22T11:44:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2077-1444
10.3390/rel7040039
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833601191495335936