A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841 |
Resumo: | King’s publication based on a key note presentation at the 2014 British Association of theStudy of Spirituality (BASS) conference, a well written and thought provoking paper, leads us toconsider the contribution of this critique of spirituality research to contemporary debates on the topicThe views expressed within the paper are important and foster debate about the validity of researchin the field of spirituality and religion. However, at the same time, this debate is reminiscent of thenegative responses sometimes expressed about research publications in this field. At the same time,it must be recognised that there is a view held that there is an extra yard stick required for researchersin this field, who can be subjected to much higher standards and expectations than other researcherssimply because of the topic and the deep seated conflicting views that advocates and critics hold.This paper considers the merits and challenges of this paper in light of this. |
id |
RCAP_6ac68dde9cba363148d2608e3e7f0d1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/33841 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20SpiritualityReligionEvidence-based practiceKing’s publication based on a key note presentation at the 2014 British Association of theStudy of Spirituality (BASS) conference, a well written and thought provoking paper, leads us toconsider the contribution of this critique of spirituality research to contemporary debates on the topicThe views expressed within the paper are important and foster debate about the validity of researchin the field of spirituality and religion. However, at the same time, this debate is reminiscent of thenegative responses sometimes expressed about research publications in this field. At the same time,it must be recognised that there is a view held that there is an extra yard stick required for researchersin this field, who can be subjected to much higher standards and expectations than other researcherssimply because of the topic and the deep seated conflicting views that advocates and critics hold.This paper considers the merits and challenges of this paper in light of this.VeritatiTimmins, FionaCaldeira, SílviaNaughton, Margaret TheresaPlakas, SotiriosKoenig, Harold G.2021-06-22T11:44:22Z2016-04-122016-04-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841eng2077-144410.3390/rel7040039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-13T13:44:19Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/33841Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:59:19.103097Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
title |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
spellingShingle |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 Timmins, Fiona Spirituality Religion Evidence-based practice |
title_short |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
title_full |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
title_fullStr |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
title_full_unstemmed |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
title_sort |
A commentary on Michael King. “The challenge of research into religion and spirituality.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 4 (2014): 106–20 |
author |
Timmins, Fiona |
author_facet |
Timmins, Fiona Caldeira, Sílvia Naughton, Margaret Theresa Plakas, Sotirios Koenig, Harold G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caldeira, Sílvia Naughton, Margaret Theresa Plakas, Sotirios Koenig, Harold G. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritati |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Timmins, Fiona Caldeira, Sílvia Naughton, Margaret Theresa Plakas, Sotirios Koenig, Harold G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spirituality Religion Evidence-based practice |
topic |
Spirituality Religion Evidence-based practice |
description |
King’s publication based on a key note presentation at the 2014 British Association of theStudy of Spirituality (BASS) conference, a well written and thought provoking paper, leads us toconsider the contribution of this critique of spirituality research to contemporary debates on the topicThe views expressed within the paper are important and foster debate about the validity of researchin the field of spirituality and religion. However, at the same time, this debate is reminiscent of thenegative responses sometimes expressed about research publications in this field. At the same time,it must be recognised that there is a view held that there is an extra yard stick required for researchersin this field, who can be subjected to much higher standards and expectations than other researcherssimply because of the topic and the deep seated conflicting views that advocates and critics hold.This paper considers the merits and challenges of this paper in light of this. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-12 2016-04-12T00:00:00Z 2021-06-22T11:44:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33841 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2077-1444 10.3390/rel7040039 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833601191495335936 |