Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jácome,Filipa
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Ribeiro,Beatriz, Dias Neto,Marina
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2022000200082
Summary: Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is often recommended as first option for patients with suitable abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) anatomy. Nevertheless, this treatment carries higher reintervention rates and possibly higher aneurysm and all cause-related mortality in the long run versus open surgery. This narrative review aims to convey recent data about surveillance and the frequency and indications for reintervention after EVAR. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, providing a critical and objective analysis of the current knowledge on a topic. Results: EVAR-1 trial reported lower total and aneurysm-related mortality in the first 6 months after EVAR patients, with increasing follow-up time the mortality rate increased, leading to a higher total and aneurysm-related mortality, comparing with the open surgical repair group. There is no consensus on EVAR surveillance, and in the 15-year follow-up of EVAR-1 trial they found that EVAR is associated with a reintervention rate of up to 20% in the first 4 years. There is a press in need for a homogeneity and contemporary appraisal of surveillance after EVAR and in indications for reintervention. In order to accomplish that, it is of paramount importance that centers undergoing EVAR programs publish their results about the compliance of follow up after EVAR and reintervention rates Conclusion: Long term outcomes are the Achilles heel of the endovascular AAA repair. Adequate follow up and reintervention are of paramount importance for EVAR to achieve its full potential.
id RCAP_61cf33c7483e00df38e6217b365626e6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-706X2022000200082
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?Abdominal aortic aneurysmsurveillancesurgeryendovascularAbstract Introduction: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is often recommended as first option for patients with suitable abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) anatomy. Nevertheless, this treatment carries higher reintervention rates and possibly higher aneurysm and all cause-related mortality in the long run versus open surgery. This narrative review aims to convey recent data about surveillance and the frequency and indications for reintervention after EVAR. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, providing a critical and objective analysis of the current knowledge on a topic. Results: EVAR-1 trial reported lower total and aneurysm-related mortality in the first 6 months after EVAR patients, with increasing follow-up time the mortality rate increased, leading to a higher total and aneurysm-related mortality, comparing with the open surgical repair group. There is no consensus on EVAR surveillance, and in the 15-year follow-up of EVAR-1 trial they found that EVAR is associated with a reintervention rate of up to 20% in the first 4 years. There is a press in need for a homogeneity and contemporary appraisal of surveillance after EVAR and in indications for reintervention. In order to accomplish that, it is of paramount importance that centers undergoing EVAR programs publish their results about the compliance of follow up after EVAR and reintervention rates Conclusion: Long term outcomes are the Achilles heel of the endovascular AAA repair. Adequate follow up and reintervention are of paramount importance for EVAR to achieve its full potential.Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2022000200082Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.18 n.2 2022reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2022000200082Jácome,FilipaRibeiro,BeatrizDias Neto,Marinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:23:05Zoai:scielo:S1646-706X2022000200082Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:10:27.265226Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
title Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
spellingShingle Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
Jácome,Filipa
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
surveillance
surgery
endovascular
title_short Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
title_full Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
title_fullStr Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
title_full_unstemmed Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
title_sort Reintervention after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - who is to blame?
author Jácome,Filipa
author_facet Jácome,Filipa
Ribeiro,Beatriz
Dias Neto,Marina
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro,Beatriz
Dias Neto,Marina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jácome,Filipa
Ribeiro,Beatriz
Dias Neto,Marina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abdominal aortic aneurysm
surveillance
surgery
endovascular
topic Abdominal aortic aneurysm
surveillance
surgery
endovascular
description Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is often recommended as first option for patients with suitable abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) anatomy. Nevertheless, this treatment carries higher reintervention rates and possibly higher aneurysm and all cause-related mortality in the long run versus open surgery. This narrative review aims to convey recent data about surveillance and the frequency and indications for reintervention after EVAR. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, providing a critical and objective analysis of the current knowledge on a topic. Results: EVAR-1 trial reported lower total and aneurysm-related mortality in the first 6 months after EVAR patients, with increasing follow-up time the mortality rate increased, leading to a higher total and aneurysm-related mortality, comparing with the open surgical repair group. There is no consensus on EVAR surveillance, and in the 15-year follow-up of EVAR-1 trial they found that EVAR is associated with a reintervention rate of up to 20% in the first 4 years. There is a press in need for a homogeneity and contemporary appraisal of surveillance after EVAR and in indications for reintervention. In order to accomplish that, it is of paramount importance that centers undergoing EVAR programs publish their results about the compliance of follow up after EVAR and reintervention rates Conclusion: Long term outcomes are the Achilles heel of the endovascular AAA repair. Adequate follow up and reintervention are of paramount importance for EVAR to achieve its full potential.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2022000200082
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2022000200082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2022000200082
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.18 n.2 2022
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593504634241024