Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8382 |
Summary: | The replication crisis has highlighted the importance of reproducibility and replicability in the social and behavioral sciences, including in communication research. While there have been some discussions of and studies on replications in communication research, the extent of this work is significantly lower than in psychology. The key reasons for this limitation are the differences between the disciplines in the topics commonly studied and in the methods and data commonly used in communication research. Communication research often investigates dynamic topics and uses methods (e.g., content analysis) and data types (e.g., media content and social media data) that are not used, or, at least, are much less frequently used, in other fields. These specific characteristics of communication research must be considered and require a more nuanced understanding of reproducibility and replicability. This thematic issue includes commentaries presenting different perspectives, as well as methodological and empirical work investigating the reproducibility and replicability of a wide range of communication research, including surveys, experiments, systematic literature reviews, and studies that involve social media or audio data. The articles in this issue acknowledge the diversity and unique features of communication research and present various ways of improving its reproducibility and replicability, as well as our understanding thereof. |
id |
RCAP_604c1e951a34a2feef3069237a0918eb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8382 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Researchcommunication research; meta-science; open science; replicability; reproducibilityThe replication crisis has highlighted the importance of reproducibility and replicability in the social and behavioral sciences, including in communication research. While there have been some discussions of and studies on replications in communication research, the extent of this work is significantly lower than in psychology. The key reasons for this limitation are the differences between the disciplines in the topics commonly studied and in the methods and data commonly used in communication research. Communication research often investigates dynamic topics and uses methods (e.g., content analysis) and data types (e.g., media content and social media data) that are not used, or, at least, are much less frequently used, in other fields. These specific characteristics of communication research must be considered and require a more nuanced understanding of reproducibility and replicability. This thematic issue includes commentaries presenting different perspectives, as well as methodological and empirical work investigating the reproducibility and replicability of a wide range of communication research, including surveys, experiments, systematic literature reviews, and studies that involve social media or audio data. The articles in this issue acknowledge the diversity and unique features of communication research and present various ways of improving its reproducibility and replicability, as well as our understanding thereof.Cogitatio Press2024-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8382https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8382Media and Communication; Vol 12 (2024): Reproducibility and Replicability in Communication Research2183-243910.17645/mac.i429reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8382https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8382/3813Copyright (c) 2024 Johannes Breuer, Mario Haiminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBreuer, JohannesHaim, Mario2024-06-20T17:45:16Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8382Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:55:54.847944Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
title |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
spellingShingle |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research Breuer, Johannes communication research; meta-science; open science; replicability; reproducibility |
title_short |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
title_full |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
title_fullStr |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
title_sort |
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research |
author |
Breuer, Johannes |
author_facet |
Breuer, Johannes Haim, Mario |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Haim, Mario |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Breuer, Johannes Haim, Mario |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
communication research; meta-science; open science; replicability; reproducibility |
topic |
communication research; meta-science; open science; replicability; reproducibility |
description |
The replication crisis has highlighted the importance of reproducibility and replicability in the social and behavioral sciences, including in communication research. While there have been some discussions of and studies on replications in communication research, the extent of this work is significantly lower than in psychology. The key reasons for this limitation are the differences between the disciplines in the topics commonly studied and in the methods and data commonly used in communication research. Communication research often investigates dynamic topics and uses methods (e.g., content analysis) and data types (e.g., media content and social media data) that are not used, or, at least, are much less frequently used, in other fields. These specific characteristics of communication research must be considered and require a more nuanced understanding of reproducibility and replicability. This thematic issue includes commentaries presenting different perspectives, as well as methodological and empirical work investigating the reproducibility and replicability of a wide range of communication research, including surveys, experiments, systematic literature reviews, and studies that involve social media or audio data. The articles in this issue acknowledge the diversity and unique features of communication research and present various ways of improving its reproducibility and replicability, as well as our understanding thereof. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-06-19 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8382 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8382 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8382 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8382 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8382/3813 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Johannes Breuer, Mario Haim info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Johannes Breuer, Mario Haim |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Communication; Vol 12 (2024): Reproducibility and Replicability in Communication Research 2183-2439 10.17645/mac.i429 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597065370796032 |