Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2025 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321 |
Summary: | Referendum use has been increasing around the world. In some cases, referendum devices are incorporated into the institutional architecture of the state while in many others, referendums are used in an, and often consultative manner, to determine positions on contentious and divisive political questions. Many of the divisive referendum questions are what we term “cleavage referendums” in this thematic issue. These referendums ask questions that draw from underlying cleavages or fault lines in politics. Voting in these referendums will often exhibit first‐order effects, as voters make decisions that align with their fundamental values and beliefs. The articles in this issue make three important contributions to enrich existing work on referendums: The first contribution lies in the development of new conceptual models for analysing referendums, such as new forms of classifying cleavage referendums, presenting a predictive model for the outcomes of referendum votes, and documenting and applying methodological approaches and frameworks that can provide the foundations for further future comparative work. The second contribution builds on the burgeoning literature that sits at the intersection of deliberative and direct democracy. In this sense, the articles interrogate examples of deliberative and participatory innovations in combination with referendum votes, while also examining their further potential, especially in one of the most contentious referendum contexts, secession. Finally, the role of cleavage structures in shaping voter decision‐making is explored thoroughly in comparative analyses and single case studies. |
id |
RCAP_575d7f1097a779cc07c115ee431f4145 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/10321 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Changecleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendumsReferendum use has been increasing around the world. In some cases, referendum devices are incorporated into the institutional architecture of the state while in many others, referendums are used in an, and often consultative manner, to determine positions on contentious and divisive political questions. Many of the divisive referendum questions are what we term “cleavage referendums” in this thematic issue. These referendums ask questions that draw from underlying cleavages or fault lines in politics. Voting in these referendums will often exhibit first‐order effects, as voters make decisions that align with their fundamental values and beliefs. The articles in this issue make three important contributions to enrich existing work on referendums: The first contribution lies in the development of new conceptual models for analysing referendums, such as new forms of classifying cleavage referendums, presenting a predictive model for the outcomes of referendum votes, and documenting and applying methodological approaches and frameworks that can provide the foundations for further future comparative work. The second contribution builds on the burgeoning literature that sits at the intersection of deliberative and direct democracy. In this sense, the articles interrogate examples of deliberative and participatory innovations in combination with referendum votes, while also examining their further potential, especially in one of the most contentious referendum contexts, secession. Finally, the role of cleavage structures in shaping voter decision‐making is explored thoroughly in comparative analyses and single case studies.Cogitatio Press2025-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321Politics and Governance; Vol 13 (2025): Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change2183-246310.17645/pag.i390reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321/4362Copyright (c) 2025 Theresa Reidyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReidy, Theresa2025-05-08T15:15:31Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/10321Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T06:44:10.098963Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
title |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
spellingShingle |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change Reidy, Theresa cleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendums |
title_short |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
title_full |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
title_fullStr |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
title_sort |
Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change |
author |
Reidy, Theresa |
author_facet |
Reidy, Theresa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reidy, Theresa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendums |
topic |
cleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendums |
description |
Referendum use has been increasing around the world. In some cases, referendum devices are incorporated into the institutional architecture of the state while in many others, referendums are used in an, and often consultative manner, to determine positions on contentious and divisive political questions. Many of the divisive referendum questions are what we term “cleavage referendums” in this thematic issue. These referendums ask questions that draw from underlying cleavages or fault lines in politics. Voting in these referendums will often exhibit first‐order effects, as voters make decisions that align with their fundamental values and beliefs. The articles in this issue make three important contributions to enrich existing work on referendums: The first contribution lies in the development of new conceptual models for analysing referendums, such as new forms of classifying cleavage referendums, presenting a predictive model for the outcomes of referendum votes, and documenting and applying methodological approaches and frameworks that can provide the foundations for further future comparative work. The second contribution builds on the burgeoning literature that sits at the intersection of deliberative and direct democracy. In this sense, the articles interrogate examples of deliberative and participatory innovations in combination with referendum votes, while also examining their further potential, especially in one of the most contentious referendum contexts, secession. Finally, the role of cleavage structures in shaping voter decision‐making is explored thoroughly in comparative analyses and single case studies. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-05-07 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321/4362 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2025 Theresa Reidy info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2025 Theresa Reidy |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 13 (2025): Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change 2183-2463 10.17645/pag.i390 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833602767629844480 |