Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reidy, Theresa
Publication Date: 2025
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321
Summary: Referendum use has been increasing around the world. In some cases, referendum devices are incorporated into the institutional architecture of the state while in many others, referendums are used in an, and often consultative manner, to determine positions on contentious and divisive political questions. Many of the divisive referendum questions are what we term “cleavage referendums” in this thematic issue. These referendums ask questions that draw from underlying cleavages or fault lines in politics. Voting in these referendums will often exhibit first‐order effects, as voters make decisions that align with their fundamental values and beliefs. The articles in this issue make three important contributions to enrich existing work on referendums: The first contribution lies in the development of new conceptual models for analysing referendums, such as new forms of classifying cleavage referendums, presenting a predictive model for the outcomes of referendum votes, and documenting and applying methodological approaches and frameworks that can provide the foundations for further future comparative work. The second contribution builds on the burgeoning literature that sits at the intersection of deliberative and direct democracy. In this sense, the articles interrogate examples of deliberative and participatory innovations in combination with referendum votes, while also examining their further potential, especially in one of the most contentious referendum contexts, secession. Finally, the role of cleavage structures in shaping voter decision‐making is explored thoroughly in comparative analyses and single case studies.
id RCAP_575d7f1097a779cc07c115ee431f4145
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/10321
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Changecleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendumsReferendum use has been increasing around the world. In some cases, referendum devices are incorporated into the institutional architecture of the state while in many others, referendums are used in an, and often consultative manner, to determine positions on contentious and divisive political questions. Many of the divisive referendum questions are what we term “cleavage referendums” in this thematic issue. These referendums ask questions that draw from underlying cleavages or fault lines in politics. Voting in these referendums will often exhibit first‐order effects, as voters make decisions that align with their fundamental values and beliefs. The articles in this issue make three important contributions to enrich existing work on referendums: The first contribution lies in the development of new conceptual models for analysing referendums, such as new forms of classifying cleavage referendums, presenting a predictive model for the outcomes of referendum votes, and documenting and applying methodological approaches and frameworks that can provide the foundations for further future comparative work. The second contribution builds on the burgeoning literature that sits at the intersection of deliberative and direct democracy. In this sense, the articles interrogate examples of deliberative and participatory innovations in combination with referendum votes, while also examining their further potential, especially in one of the most contentious referendum contexts, secession. Finally, the role of cleavage structures in shaping voter decision‐making is explored thoroughly in comparative analyses and single case studies.Cogitatio Press2025-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321Politics and Governance; Vol 13 (2025): Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change2183-246310.17645/pag.i390reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321/4362Copyright (c) 2025 Theresa Reidyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReidy, Theresa2025-05-08T15:15:31Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/10321Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T06:44:10.098963Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
title Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
spellingShingle Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
Reidy, Theresa
cleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendums
title_short Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
title_full Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
title_fullStr Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
title_full_unstemmed Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
title_sort Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
author Reidy, Theresa
author_facet Reidy, Theresa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reidy, Theresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendums
topic cleavage referendums; ideology; political cleavages; referendum campaigns; referendum voting; referendums
description Referendum use has been increasing around the world. In some cases, referendum devices are incorporated into the institutional architecture of the state while in many others, referendums are used in an, and often consultative manner, to determine positions on contentious and divisive political questions. Many of the divisive referendum questions are what we term “cleavage referendums” in this thematic issue. These referendums ask questions that draw from underlying cleavages or fault lines in politics. Voting in these referendums will often exhibit first‐order effects, as voters make decisions that align with their fundamental values and beliefs. The articles in this issue make three important contributions to enrich existing work on referendums: The first contribution lies in the development of new conceptual models for analysing referendums, such as new forms of classifying cleavage referendums, presenting a predictive model for the outcomes of referendum votes, and documenting and applying methodological approaches and frameworks that can provide the foundations for further future comparative work. The second contribution builds on the burgeoning literature that sits at the intersection of deliberative and direct democracy. In this sense, the articles interrogate examples of deliberative and participatory innovations in combination with referendum votes, while also examining their further potential, especially in one of the most contentious referendum contexts, secession. Finally, the role of cleavage structures in shaping voter decision‐making is explored thoroughly in comparative analyses and single case studies.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10321/4362
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2025 Theresa Reidy
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2025 Theresa Reidy
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 13 (2025): Cleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Change
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i390
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602767629844480