On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7935 |
Summary: | Common models of the scientific method articulate the processes by which we hypothesize about the correlation between variables and then test those predictions to make incremental conclusions about the world around us. Implied in this process is the replication and extension of that knowledge to various contexts. As with other social sciences, published analyses have demonstrated that media and communication scholarship suffers from a lack of replication studies, often due to presumptions about the lack of reward or incentive for conducting this work—such as perceived difficulties securing support for and/or publishing these studies. This commentary will reflect on and reinforce arguments for the intentional and important role of replication studies in media and communication scholarship. The essay reflects on replication as a key to post-positivist approaches, and then highlights recent developments that center replication work as key to scientific progression. |
id |
RCAP_53ad0accd68eb8a8603c47e7470d2cc6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7935 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Researchopen science; post-positivism; replication; research integrity; social sciencesCommon models of the scientific method articulate the processes by which we hypothesize about the correlation between variables and then test those predictions to make incremental conclusions about the world around us. Implied in this process is the replication and extension of that knowledge to various contexts. As with other social sciences, published analyses have demonstrated that media and communication scholarship suffers from a lack of replication studies, often due to presumptions about the lack of reward or incentive for conducting this work—such as perceived difficulties securing support for and/or publishing these studies. This commentary will reflect on and reinforce arguments for the intentional and important role of replication studies in media and communication scholarship. The essay reflects on replication as a key to post-positivist approaches, and then highlights recent developments that center replication work as key to scientific progression.Cogitatio Press2024-03-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7935https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7935Media and Communication; Vol 12 (2024): Reproducibility and Replicability in Communication Research2183-243910.17645/mac.i429reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7935https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7935/3695Copyright (c) 2024 Nicholas David Bowmaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBowman, Nicholas David2024-06-20T17:45:16Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7935Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:55:54.728552Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
title |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
spellingShingle |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research Bowman, Nicholas David open science; post-positivism; replication; research integrity; social sciences |
title_short |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
title_full |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
title_fullStr |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
title_sort |
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research |
author |
Bowman, Nicholas David |
author_facet |
Bowman, Nicholas David |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bowman, Nicholas David |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
open science; post-positivism; replication; research integrity; social sciences |
topic |
open science; post-positivism; replication; research integrity; social sciences |
description |
Common models of the scientific method articulate the processes by which we hypothesize about the correlation between variables and then test those predictions to make incremental conclusions about the world around us. Implied in this process is the replication and extension of that knowledge to various contexts. As with other social sciences, published analyses have demonstrated that media and communication scholarship suffers from a lack of replication studies, often due to presumptions about the lack of reward or incentive for conducting this work—such as perceived difficulties securing support for and/or publishing these studies. This commentary will reflect on and reinforce arguments for the intentional and important role of replication studies in media and communication scholarship. The essay reflects on replication as a key to post-positivist approaches, and then highlights recent developments that center replication work as key to scientific progression. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7935 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7935 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7935 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7935 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7935/3695 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Nicholas David Bowman info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Nicholas David Bowman |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Communication; Vol 12 (2024): Reproducibility and Replicability in Communication Research 2183-2439 10.17645/mac.i429 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597065366601728 |