Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Costa,Ana Rita
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Frutado,Inês, Gonçalves,João, Meireles,Mariana, Neves,João, Mateus,Andrea
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
Summary: Introduction: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the most prevalent causes of observation in the emergency department in an ageing population. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown good results in critically ill with ARF. The evidence of NIPPV outcomes in old patients is scarce. The aim of our study is to analyse outcomes of NIPPV use in this population. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed intermediate care unit of an university hospital. We included and consecutively compared patients aged 75 years old or more (study group) and under 65 years old (control group) submitted to NIPPV due to ARF. The primary end point was mortality (in-hospital and 30 daysafter discharge). Secondary endpoints were NIPPV settings, complications, and failure rate. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the study group (22.2 % vs 8.1%, p< 0.01). However, mortality 30 days after discharge was not significantly different (4.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.37). NIPPV duration of use (6.1 vs 2.2 days, p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 6.2 days, p = 0.01) were higher in the study group. NIPPV failure (22.2% vs 16.1 %, p = 0.09) and complication rate (intolerance 8% vs 6%, p = 0.31; ulcers 4% vs 3%, p = 0.28) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: ARF carries a grim prognosis in older adults. A high mortality rate was observed in older patients despite similar severity assessments and NIPPV failure and complication rates. Notably, out of the hospital mortality is comparable between both groups.
id RCAP_501afb4fb12f095e845983b64137d53d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-671X2020000300009
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?AgedAged, 80 and overNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyTreatment FailureIntroduction: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the most prevalent causes of observation in the emergency department in an ageing population. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown good results in critically ill with ARF. The evidence of NIPPV outcomes in old patients is scarce. The aim of our study is to analyse outcomes of NIPPV use in this population. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed intermediate care unit of an university hospital. We included and consecutively compared patients aged 75 years old or more (study group) and under 65 years old (control group) submitted to NIPPV due to ARF. The primary end point was mortality (in-hospital and 30 daysafter discharge). Secondary endpoints were NIPPV settings, complications, and failure rate. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the study group (22.2 % vs 8.1%, p< 0.01). However, mortality 30 days after discharge was not significantly different (4.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.37). NIPPV duration of use (6.1 vs 2.2 days, p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 6.2 days, p = 0.01) were higher in the study group. NIPPV failure (22.2% vs 16.1 %, p = 0.09) and complication rate (intolerance 8% vs 6%, p = 0.31; ulcers 4% vs 3%, p = 0.28) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: ARF carries a grim prognosis in older adults. A high mortality rate was observed in older patients despite similar severity assessments and NIPPV failure and complication rates. Notably, out of the hospital mortality is comparable between both groups.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009Medicina Interna v.27 n.2 2020reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009Costa,Ana RitaFrutado,InêsGonçalves,JoãoMeireles,MarianaNeves,JoãoMateus,Andreainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:08:25Zoai:scielo:S0872-671X2020000300009Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T12:57:14.232191Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
spellingShingle Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
Costa,Ana Rita
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Noninvasive Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency
Treatment Failure
title_short Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_full Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_fullStr Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_full_unstemmed Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_sort Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
author Costa,Ana Rita
author_facet Costa,Ana Rita
Frutado,Inês
Gonçalves,João
Meireles,Mariana
Neves,João
Mateus,Andrea
author_role author
author2 Frutado,Inês
Gonçalves,João
Meireles,Mariana
Neves,João
Mateus,Andrea
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Ana Rita
Frutado,Inês
Gonçalves,João
Meireles,Mariana
Neves,João
Mateus,Andrea
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Noninvasive Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency
Treatment Failure
topic Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Noninvasive Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency
Treatment Failure
description Introduction: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the most prevalent causes of observation in the emergency department in an ageing population. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown good results in critically ill with ARF. The evidence of NIPPV outcomes in old patients is scarce. The aim of our study is to analyse outcomes of NIPPV use in this population. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed intermediate care unit of an university hospital. We included and consecutively compared patients aged 75 years old or more (study group) and under 65 years old (control group) submitted to NIPPV due to ARF. The primary end point was mortality (in-hospital and 30 daysafter discharge). Secondary endpoints were NIPPV settings, complications, and failure rate. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the study group (22.2 % vs 8.1%, p< 0.01). However, mortality 30 days after discharge was not significantly different (4.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.37). NIPPV duration of use (6.1 vs 2.2 days, p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 6.2 days, p = 0.01) were higher in the study group. NIPPV failure (22.2% vs 16.1 %, p = 0.09) and complication rate (intolerance 8% vs 6%, p = 0.31; ulcers 4% vs 3%, p = 0.28) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: ARF carries a grim prognosis in older adults. A high mortality rate was observed in older patients despite similar severity assessments and NIPPV failure and complication rates. Notably, out of the hospital mortality is comparable between both groups.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Medicina Interna v.27 n.2 2020
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593284998463488